journal article Open Access Jun 19, 2020

Evaluation of the MODIS Collection 6 multilayer cloud detection algorithm through comparisons with CloudSat Cloud Profiling Radar and CALIPSO CALIOP products

View at Publisher Save 10.5194/amt-13-3263-2020
Abstract
Abstract. Since multilayer cloud scenes are common in the atmosphere and can be an
important source of uncertainty in passive satellite sensor cloud
retrievals, the MODIS MOD06 and MYD06 standard cloud optical property products
include a multilayer cloud detection algorithm to assist with data quality
assessment. This paper presents an evaluation of the Aqua MODIS MYD06
Collection 6 multilayer cloud detection algorithm through comparisons with
active Cloud Profiling Radar (CPR) and Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with
Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) products that have the ability to provide cloud
vertical distributions and directly classify multilayer cloud scenes and
layer properties. To compare active sensor products with an imager such as
MODIS, it is first necessary to define multilayer clouds in the context of
their radiative impact on cloud retrievals. Three main parameters have thus
been considered in this evaluation: (1) the maximum separation distance
between two cloud layers, (2) the thermodynamic phase of those layers and
(3) the upper-layer cloud optical thickness. The impact of including the
Pavolonis–Heidinger multilayer cloud detection algorithm, introduced in
Collection 6, to assist with multilayer cloud detection has also been
assessed. For the year 2008, the MYD06 C6 multilayer cloud detection
algorithm identifies roughly 20 % of all cloudy pixels as multilayer
(decreasing to about 13 % if the Pavolonis–Heidinger algorithm output
is not used). Evaluation against the merged CPR and CALIOP 2B-CLDCLASS-lidar
product shows that the MODIS multilayer detection results are quite
sensitive to how multilayer clouds are defined in the radar and lidar product
and that the algorithm performs better when the optical thickness of the
upper cloud layer is greater than about 1.2 with a minimum layer separation
distance of 1 km. Finally, we find that filtering the MYD06 cloud optical
properties retrievals using the multilayer cloud flag improves aggregated
statistics, particularly for ice cloud effective radius.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
15
[1]
Baum, B. A., Menzel, W. P., Frey, R. A., Tobin, D. C., Holz, R. E., Ackerman, S. A., Heidinger, A. K., and Yang, P.: MODIS Cloud-Top Property Refinements for Collection 6, J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., 51, 1145–1163, https://doi.org/10.1175/jamc-d-11-0203.1, 2012. 10.1175/jamc-d-11-0203.1
[2]
Chang, F.-L. and Li, Z.: A New Method for Detection of Cirrus Overlapping Water Clouds and Determination of Their Optical Properties, J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 3993–4009, https://doi.org/10.1175/jas3578.1, 2005. 10.1175/jas3578.1
[3]
Desmons, M., Ferlay, N., Parol, F., Riédi, J., and Thieuleux, F.: A Global Multilayer Cloud Identification with POLDER/PARASOL, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 56, 1121–1139, https://doi.org/10.1175/jamc-d-16-0159.1, 2017. 10.1175/jamc-d-16-0159.1
[4]
Heidinger, A. K. and Pavolonis, M. J.: Global Daytime Distribution of Overlapping Cirrus Cloud from NOAA's Advanced Very High-Resolution Radiometer, J. Climate, 18, 4772–4784, https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli3535.1, 2005. 10.1175/jcli3535.1
[5]
Jin, Y. and Rossow, W. B.: Detection of cirrus overlapping low-level clouds, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 102, 1727–1737, https://doi.org/10.1029/96jd02996, 1997. 10.1029/96jd02996
[6]
Joiner, J., Vasilkov, A. P., Bhartia, P. K., Wind, G., Platnick, S., and Menzel, W. P.: Detection of multi-layer and vertically-extended clouds using A-train sensors, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 233–247, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-233-2010, 2010. 10.5194/amt-3-233-2010
[7]
Marchant, B., Platnick, S., Meyer, K., Arnold, G. T., and Riedi, J.: MODIS Collection 6 shortwave-derived cloud phase classification algorithm and comparisons with CALIOP, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 1587–1599, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1587-2016, 2016. 10.5194/amt-9-1587-2016
[8]
Nasiri, S. L. and Baum, B. A.: Daytime Multilayered Cloud Detection Using Multispectral Imager Data, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 21, 1145–1155, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2004)021&amp;lt;1145:dmcdum&amp;gt;2.0.co;2, 2004. 10.1175/1520-0426(2004)021<1145:dmcdum>2.0.co;2
[9]
Pavolonis, M. J. and Heidinger, A. K.: Daytime Cloud Overlap Detection from AVHRR and VIIRS, J. Appl. Meteorol., 43, 762–778, https://doi.org/10.1175/2099.1, 2004. 10.1175/2099.1
[10]
Platnick, S., Meyer, K. G., King, M. D., Wind, G., Amarasinghe, N., Marchant, B., Arnold, G. T., Zhang, Z., Hubanks, P. A., Holz, R. E., Yang, P., Ridgway, W. L., and Riedi, J.: Te MODIS cloud optical and microphysical products: Collection 6 updates and examples from Terra and Aqua, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 55, 502–525, 2017. 10.1109/tgrs.2016.2610522
[11]
Sourdeval, O., C.-Labonnote, L., Baran, A. J., and Brogniez, G.: A methodology for simultaneous retrieval of ice and liquid water cloud properties. Part I: Information content and case study, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 141, 870–882, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2405, 2014. 10.1002/qj.2405
[12]
Wang, T., Fetzer, E. J., Wong, S., Kahn, B. H., and Yue, Q.: Validation of MODIS cloud mask and multilayer flag using CloudSat-CALIPSO cloud profiles and a cross-reference of their cloud classifications, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 11620–11635, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jd025239, 2016. 10.1002/2016jd025239
[13]
Wang, Z., Vane, D., Stephens, G., and Reinke, D.: Level 2 Combined Radar and Lidar Cloud Scenario Classification Product Process Description and Interface Control Document, available at: http://www.cloudsat.cira.colostate.edu/sites/default/files/products/files/2B-CLDCLASS-LIDAR_PDICD.P_R04.20120522.pdf (last access: 3 January 2019), 2012.
[14]
Watts, P. D., Bennartz, R., and Fell, F.: Retrieval of two-layer cloud properties from multispectral observations using optimal estimation, J. Geophys. Res., 116, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011jd015883, 2011. 10.1029/2011jd015883
[15]
Wind, G., Platnick, S., King, M. D., Hubanks, P. A., Pavolonis, M. J., Heidinger, A. K., Yang, P., and Baum, B. A.: Multilayer Cloud Detection with the MODIS Near-Infrared Water Vapor Absorption Band, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 4911, 2315–2333, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010jamc2364.1, 2010. 10.1175/2010jamc2364.1
Cited By
42
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Metrics
42
Citations
15
References
Details
Published
Jun 19, 2020
Vol/Issue
13(6)
Pages
3263-3275
License
View
Cite This Article
Benjamin Marchant, Steven Platnick, Kerry Meyer, et al. (2020). Evaluation of the MODIS Collection 6 multilayer cloud detection algorithm through comparisons with CloudSat Cloud Profiling Radar and CALIPSO CALIOP products. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 13(6), 3263-3275. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3263-2020