Abstract
Abstract. The Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART in its original version in the mid-1990s was designed for calculating the long-range and mesoscale dispersion of hazardous substances from point sources, such as those released after an accident in a nuclear power plant.
Over the past decades, the model has evolved into a comprehensive tool for multi-scale atmospheric transport modeling and analysis and has attracted a global user community.
Its application fields have been extended to a large range of atmospheric gases and aerosols, e.g., greenhouse gases, short-lived climate forcers like black carbon and volcanic ash,
and it has also been used to study the atmospheric branch of the water cycle.
Given suitable meteorological input data, it can be used for scales from dozens of meters to global.
In particular, inverse modeling based on source–receptor relationships from FLEXPART has become widely used.
In this paper, we present FLEXPART version 10.4, which works with meteorological input data from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Integrated Forecast System (IFS) and data from the United States National Centers of Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Global Forecast System (GFS).
Since the last publication of a detailed FLEXPART description (version 6.2), the model has been improved in different aspects such as performance, physicochemical parameterizations, input/output formats, and available preprocessing and post-processing software.
The model code has also been parallelized using the Message Passing Interface (MPI).
We demonstrate that the model scales well up to using 256 processors, with a parallel efficiency greater than 75 % for up to 64 processes on multiple nodes in runs with very large numbers of particles.
The deviation from 100 % efficiency is almost entirely due to the remaining nonparallelized parts of the code, suggesting large potential for further speedup.
A new turbulence scheme for the convective boundary layer has been developed that considers the skewness in the vertical velocity distribution (updrafts and downdrafts) and vertical gradients in air density.
FLEXPART is the only model available considering both effects, making it highly accurate for small-scale applications, e.g., to quantify dispersion in the vicinity of a point source.
The wet deposition scheme for aerosols has been completely rewritten and a new, more detailed gravitational settling parameterization for aerosols has also been implemented.
FLEXPART has had the option of running backward in time from atmospheric concentrations at receptor locations for
many years, but this has now been extended to also work for deposition values and may become useful, for instance, for the interpretation of ice core measurements.
To our knowledge, to date FLEXPART is the only model with that capability.
Furthermore, the temporal variation and temperature dependence of chemical reactions with the OH radical have been included, allowing for more accurate simulations for species with intermediate lifetimes against the reaction with OH, such as ethane.
Finally, user settings can now be specified in a more flexible namelist format, and output files can be produced in NetCDF format instead of FLEXPART's customary binary format.
In this paper, we describe these new developments.
Moreover, we present some tools for the preparation of the meteorological input data and for processing FLEXPART output data, and we briefly report on alternative FLEXPART versions.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
101
[1]
Arnalds, O., Dagsson-Waldhauserova, P., and Olafsson, H.: The Icelandic volcanic aeolian environment: Processes and impacts – A review, Aeolian Res., 20, 176–195, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2016.01.004, 2016. a 10.1016/j.aeolia.2016.01.004
[2]
Arnold, D., Maurer, C., Wotawa, G., Draxler, R., Saito, K., and Seibert, P.: Influence of the meteorological input on the atmospheric transport modelling with FLEXPART of radionuclides from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident, J. Environ. Radioactiv., 139, 212–225, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2014.02.013, 2015. a 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2014.02.013
[3]
Asman, W. A. H.: Parametrisation of below-cloud scavenging of highly soluble gases under convective conditions, Atmos. Environ., 29, 1359–1368, 1995. a 10.1016/1352-2310(95)00065-7
[4]
Atkinson, R.: Gas-phase tropospheric chemistry of volatile organic compounds: 1. Alkanes and alkenes, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 26, 215–290, 1997. a 10.1063/1.556012
[5]
Balluch, M., and Haynes, P.: Quantification of lower stratospheric mixing processes using aircraft data, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 23487–23504, 1997. a 10.1029/97jd00607
[6]
Bey, I., Jacob, D. J., Logan, J. A., and Yantosca, R. M.: Asian chemical outflow to the Pacific in spring: Origins, pathways, and budgets, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 23073–23095, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jd000806, 2001. a 10.1029/2001jd000806
[7]
Brioude, J., Arnold, D., Stohl, A., Cassiani, M., Morton, D., Seibert, P., Angevine, W., Evan, S., Dingwell, A., Fast, J. D., Easter, R. C., Pisso, I., Burkhart, J., and Wotawa, G.: The Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART-WRF version 3.1, Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 1889–1904, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1889-2013, 2013. a, b, c 10.5194/gmd-6-1889-2013
[8]
Bullard, J. E., Baddock, M., Bradwell, T., Crusius, J., Darlington, E., Gaiero, D., Gasso, S., Gisladottir, G., Hodgkins, R., Mc-Culloch, R., Neuman, C. M., Mockford, T., Stewart, H., and Thorsteinsson, T.: High latitude dust in the earth system, Rev. Geophys., 54, 447–485, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016RG000518, 2016. a 10.1002/2016rg000518
[9]
Cassiani, M., Stohl, A., and Brioude, J.: Lagrangian stochastic modelling of dispersion in the convective boundary layer with skewed turbulence conditions and a vertical density gradient: Formulation and implementation in the FLEXPART Model, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 154, 367–390, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-014-9976-5, 2015. a, b, c, d 10.1007/s10546-014-9976-5
[10]
Cassiani, M., Stohl, A., Olivié, D., Seland, Ø., Bethke, I., Pisso, I., and Iversen, T.: The offline Lagrangian particle model FLEXPART–NorESM/CAM (v1): model description and comparisons with the online NorESM transport scheme and with the reference FLEXPART model, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 4029–4048, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-4029-2016, 2016. a, b, c 10.5194/gmd-9-4029-2016
[11]
Cozic, J., Verheggen, B., Mertes, S., Connolly, P., Bower, K., Petzold, A., Baltensperger, U., and Weingartner, E.: Scavenging of black carbon in mixed phase clouds at the high alpine site Jungfraujoch, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1797–1807, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1797-2007, 2007. 10.5194/acp-7-1797-2007
[12]
The ERA‐Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system

D. P. Dee, S. M. Uppala, A. J. Simmons et al.

Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Soci... 10.1002/qj.828
[13]
Eckhardt, S., Prata, A. J., Seibert, P., Stebel, K., and Stohl, A.: Estimation of the vertical profile of sulfur dioxide injection into the atmosphere by a volcanic eruption using satellite column measurements and inverse transport modeling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 3881–3897, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-3881-2008, 2008. 10.5194/acp-8-3881-2008
[14]
Eckhardt, S., Cassiani, M., Evangeliou, N., Sollum, E., Pisso, I., and Stohl, A.: Source–receptor matrix calculation for deposited mass with the Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART v10.2 in backward mode, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 4605–4618, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4605-2017, 2017. a, b, c, d, e, f 10.5194/gmd-10-4605-2017
[15]
ECMWF: User Guide to ECMWF Products 2.1. Meteorological Bulletin M3.2. Reading, UK, 1995.
[16]
Emanuel, K. A. and Živković-Rothman, M.: Development and evaluation of a convection scheme for use in climate models. J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 1766–1782, 1999. a 10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056<1766:daeoac>2.0.co;2
[17]
Fang, X., Shao, M., Stohl, A., Zhang, Q., Zheng, J., Guo, H., Wang, C., Wang, M., Ou, J., Thompson, R. L., and Prinn, R. G.: Top-down estimates of benzene and toluene emissions in the Pearl River Delta and Hong Kong, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3369–3382, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3369-2016, 2016. a 10.5194/acp-16-3369-2016
[18]
Flesch, T. K., Wilson, J. D., and Lee, E.: Backward-time Lagrangian stochastic dispersion models and their application to estimate gaseous emissions, J. Appl. Meteorol., 34, 1320–1333, 1995. a 10.1175/1520-0450(1995)034<1320:btlsdm>2.0.co;2
[19]
Forster, C., Wandinger, U., Wotawa, G., James, P., Mattis, I., Althausen, D., Simmonds, P., O'Doherty, S., Kleefeld, C., Jennings, S. G., Schneider, J., Trickl, T., Kreipl, S., Jäger, H., and Stohl, A.: Transport of boreal forest fire emissions from Canada to Europe, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 22887–22906, 2001. a 10.1029/2001jd900115
[20]
Forster, C., Stohl, A., and Seibert, P.,: Parameterization of Convective Transport in a Lagrangian Particle Dispersion Model and Its Evaluation, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 46, 403–422, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2470.1, 2007. a 10.1175/jam2470.1
[21]
Global Soil Data Task: Global soil data products CD-ROM contents (IGBP-DIS), Data Set, Oak Ridge Natl. Lab. Distrib. Active Arch. Cent., Oak Ridge, Tenn., https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/565, 2014. a
[22]
Groot Zwaaftink, C. D., Grythe, H., Skov, H., and Stohl, A.: Substantial contribution of northern high-latitude sources to mineral dust in the Arctic, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 13678–13697, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025482, 2016. a, b, c 10.1002/2016jd025482
[23]
Groot Zwaaftink, C. D., Arnalds, Ó., Dagsson-Waldhauserova, P., Eckhardt, S., Prospero, J. M., and Stohl, A.: Temporal and spatial variability of Icelandic dust emissions and atmospheric transport, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 10865–10878, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-10865-2017, 2017. a 10.5194/acp-17-10865-2017
[24]
Groot Zwaaftink, C. D., Henne, S., Thompson, R. L., Dlugokencky, E. J., Machida, T., Paris, J.-D., Sasakawa, M., Segers, A., Sweeney, C., and Stohl, A.: Three-dimensional methane distribution simulated with FLEXPART 8-CTM-1.1 constrained with observation data, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 4469–4487, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4469-2018, 2018. a, b 10.5194/gmd-11-4469-2018
[25]
Grythe, H., Kristiansen, N. I., Groot Zwaaftink, C. D., Eckhardt, S., Ström, J., Tunved, P., Krejci, R., and Stohl, A.: A new aerosol wet removal scheme for the Lagrangian particle model FLEXPART v10, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 1447–1466, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1447-2017, 2017. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h 10.5194/gmd-10-1447-2017
[26]
Haynes, P. and Anglade, J.: The Vertical-Scale Cascade in Atmospheric Tracers due to Large-Scale Differential Advection, J. Atmos. Sci., 54, 1121–1136, 1997. a 10.1175/1520-0469(1997)054<1121:tvscia>2.0.co;2
[27]
Heinz, S.: Statistical Mechanics of Turbulent Flows, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, 214 pp., 2003. a 10.1007/978-3-662-10022-6
[28]
Henne, S., Brunner, D., Oney, B., Leuenberger, M., Eugster, W., Bamberger, I., Meinhardt, F., Steinbacher, M., and Emmenegger, L.: Validation of the Swiss methane emission inventory by atmospheric observations and inverse modelling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3683–3710, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3683-2016, 2016. 10.5194/acp-16-3683-2016
[29]
Henning, S., Bojinski, S., Diehl, K., Ghan, S., Nyeki, S., Weingartner, E., Wurzler, S., and Baltensperger, U.: Aerosol partitioning in natural mixed-phase clouds, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L06101, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL019025, 2004. 10.1029/2003gl019025
[30]
Hertel, O., Christensen, J. Runge, E. H., Asman, W. A. H., Berkowicz, R., Hovmand, M. F., and Hov, O.: Development and testing of a new variable scale air pollution model – ACDEP, Atmos. Environ., 29, 1267–1290, 1995. a, b 10.1016/1352-2310(95)00067-9
[31]
Hittmeir, S., Philipp, A., and Seibert, P.: A conservative reconstruction scheme for the interpolation of extensive quantities in the Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 2503–2523, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2503-2018, 2018. a, b 10.5194/gmd-11-2503-2018
[32]
Die Tropopause: Entdeckung, Definition, Bestimmung

Klaus P. Hoinka

Meteorologische Zeitschrift 10.1127/metz/6/1997/281
[33]
xarray: N-D labeled Arrays and Datasets in Python

Stephan Hoyer, Joe Hamman

Journal of Open Research Software 10.5334/jors.148
[34]
Jones, A., Thomson, D., Hort, M., and Devenish, B.: The UK Met Office’s next generation atmospheric dispersion model, NAME III, in Air Pollution Modelling and its Application XVII, edited by: Borrego, C. and Norman, A.-L., Springer, New York, 580–589, 2007. a, b 10.1007/978-0-387-68854-1_62
[35]
Kok, J. F.: A scaling theory for the size distribution of emitted dust aerosols suggests climate models underestimate the size of the global dust cycle, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108, 1016–1021, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1014798108, 2011. a 10.1073/pnas.1014798108
[36]
Kristiansen, N. I., Stohl, A., Prata, A. J., Richter, A., Eckhardt, S., Seibert, P., Hoffmann, A., Ritter, C., Bitar, L., Duck, T. J., and Stebel, K.: Remote sensing and inverse transport modelling of the Kasatochi eruption sulphur dioxide cloud, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D00L16, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013286, 2010. 10.1029/2009jd013286
[37]
Kristiansen, N. I., Stohl, A., Prata, F., Bukowiecki, N., Dacre, H., Eckhardt, S., Henne, S., Hort, M., Johnson, B., Marenco, F., Neininger, B., Reitebuch, O., Seibert, P., Thomson, D., Webster, H., and Weinzierl, B.: Performance assessment of a volcanic ash transport model mini-ensemble used for inverse modelling of the 2010 Eyjafjallajökull eruption, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D00U11, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016844, 2012. 10.1029/2011jd016844
[38]
Kristiansen, N. I., Prata, A. J., Stohl, A., and Carn, S. A. : Stratospheric volcanic ash emissions from the 13 February 2014 Kelut eruption, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 588–596, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062307, 2015. 10.1002/2014gl062307
[39]
Kristiansen, N. I., Stohl, A., Olivié, D. J. L., Croft, B., Søvde, O. A., Klein, H., Christoudias, T., Kunkel, D., Leadbetter, S. J., Lee, Y. H., Zhang, K., Tsigaridis, K., Bergman, T., Evangeliou, N., Wang, H., Ma, P.-L., Easter, R. C., Rasch, P. J., Liu, X., Pitari, G., Di Genova, G., Zhao, S. Y., Balkanski, Y., Bauer, S. E., Faluvegi, G. S., Kokkola, H., Martin, R. V., Pierce, J. R., Schulz, M., Shindell, D., Tost, H., and Zhang, H.: Evaluation of observed and modelled aerosol lifetimes using radioactive tracers of opportunity and an ensemble of 19 global models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3525–3561, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3525-2016, 2016. a, b 10.5194/acp-16-3525-2016
[40]
Kyrö, E.-M., Grönholm, T., Vuollekoski, H., Virkkula, A., Kulmala, M., and Laakso, L. : Snow scavenging of ultrafine particles: field measurements and parameterization. Boreal Environ. Res., 14, 527–538, 2009. a, b
[41]
Laakso, L., Grönholm, T., Rannika, Ü., Kosmalea, M., Fiedlera, V., Vehkamäki, H., and Kulmala, M.: Ultrafine particle scavenging coefficients calculated from 6 years field measurements, Atmos. Environ. 37, 3605–3613, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(03)00326-1, 2003. a, b 10.1016/s1352-2310(03)00326-1
[42]
Laloyaux, P., de Boisseson, E., Balmaseda, M., Bidlot, J.R. Broennimann, S., Buizza, R., Dalhgren, P., Dee, D., Haimberger, L., Hersbach, H., Kosaka, Y., Martin, M., Poli, P., Rayner, N., Rustemeier, E., and Schepers, D.: CERA20C: A coupled reanalysis of the twentieth century, J. Adv. Model Earth Sy., 10, 1172–1195, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001273, 2018. a 10.1029/2018ms001273
[43]
Legras, B., Joseph, B., and Lefevre, F.: Vertical diffusivity in the lower stratosphere from Lagrangian back-trajectory reconstructions of ozone profiles, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4562, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003045, 2003. a 10.1029/2002jd003045
[44]
Lin, J. C., Gerbig, C., Wofsy, S. C., Andrews, A. E., Daube, B. C., Davis, K. J., and Grainger, C. A.: A near-field tool for simulating the upstream influence of atmospheric observations: The Stochastic Time-Inverted Lagrangian Transport (STILT) model, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4493, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003161, 2003. a, b 10.1029/2002jd003161
[45]
Luhar, A. K. and Britter, R. E.: Random walk model for dispersion in inhomogeneous turbulence in a convective boundary layer, Atmos. Environ., 23, 1911–1924, 1989. a, b 10.1016/0004-6981(89)90516-7
[46]
Marticorena, B. and Bergametti, G.: Modeling the atmospheric dust cycle: 1. Design of a soil-derived dust emission scheme, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 16415–16430, https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD00690, 1995. a 10.1029/95jd00690
[47]
McConnell, J. R., Wilson, A. I., Stohl, A., Arienzo, M. M., Chellman, N. J., Eckhardt, S., Thompson, E. M., Pollard, A. M., and Steffensen, J. P.: Lead pollution recorded in Greenland ice indicates European emissions tracked plagues, wars, and imperial expansion during antiquity, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 115, 5726–5731, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1721818115, 2018. a 10.1073/pnas.1721818115
[48]
McMahon, T. A. and Denison, P. J.: Empirical atmospheric deposition parameters – a survey, Atmos. Environ., 13, 571–585, 1979. a 10.1016/0004-6981(79)90186-0
[49]
Moxnes, E., Kristiansen, N.I., Stohl, A., Clarisse, L., Durant, A., Weber, K., and Vogel, A.: Separation of ash and sulfur dioxide during the 2011 Grímsvötn eruption, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 7477–7501, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021129, 2014. 10.1002/2013jd021129
[50]
Message Passing Interface Forum: available at: https://www.mpi-forum.org/ (last access: 30 October 2019), 2015. a

Showing 50 of 101 references