The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crop products

M. M. Mekonnen; A. Y. Hoekstra

doi:10.5194/hess-15-1577-2011

journal article Open Access May 25, 2011

The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crop products

M. M. Mekonnen A. Y. Hoekstra

Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Vol. 15 No. 5 pp. 1577-1600 · Copernicus GmbH

View at Publisher Save 10.5194/hess-15-1577-2011

Abstract

Abstract. This study quantifies the green, blue and grey water footprint of global crop production in a spatially-explicit way for the period 1996–2005. The assessment improves upon earlier research by taking a high-resolution approach, estimating the water footprint of 126 crops at a 5 by 5 arc minute grid. We have used a grid-based dynamic water balance model to calculate crop water use over time, with a time step of one day. The model takes into account the daily soil water balance and climatic conditions for each grid cell. In addition, the water pollution associated with the use of nitrogen fertilizer in crop production is estimated for each grid cell. The crop evapotranspiration of additional 20 minor crops is calculated with the CROPWAT model. In addition, we have calculated the water footprint of more than two hundred derived crop products, including various flours, beverages, fibres and biofuels. We have used the water footprint assessment framework as in the guideline of the Water Footprint Network. Considering the water footprints of primary crops, we see that the global average water footprint per ton of crop increases from sugar crops (roughly 200 m3 ton−1), vegetables (300 m3 ton−1), roots and tubers (400 m3 ton−1), fruits (1000 m3 ton−1), cereals (1600 m3 ton−1), oil crops (2400 m3 ton−1) to pulses (4000 m3 ton−1). The water footprint varies, however, across different crops per crop category and per production region as well. Besides, if one considers the water footprint per kcal, the picture changes as well. When considered per ton of product, commodities with relatively large water footprints are: coffee, tea, cocoa, tobacco, spices, nuts, rubber and fibres. The analysis of water footprints of different biofuels shows that bio-ethanol has a lower water footprint (in m3 GJ−1) than biodiesel, which supports earlier analyses. The crop used matters significantly as well: the global average water footprint of bio-ethanol based on sugar beet amounts to 51 m3 GJ−1, while this is 121 m3 GJ−1 for maize. The global water footprint related to crop production in the period 1996–2005 was 7404 billion cubic meters per year (78 % green, 12 % blue, 10 % grey). A large total water footprint was calculated for wheat (1087 Gm3 yr−1), rice (992 Gm3 yr−1) and maize (770 Gm3 yr−1). Wheat and rice have the largest blue water footprints, together accounting for 45 % of the global blue water footprint. At country level, the total water footprint was largest for India (1047 Gm3 yr−1), China (967 Gm3 yr−1) and the USA (826 Gm3 yr−1). A relatively large total blue water footprint as a result of crop production is observed in the Indus river basin (117 Gm3 yr−1) and the Ganges river basin (108 Gm3 yr−1). The two basins together account for 25 % of the blue water footprint related to global crop production. Globally, rain-fed agriculture has a water footprint of 5173 Gm3 yr−1 (91 % green, 9 % grey); irrigated agriculture has a water footprint of 2230 Gm3 yr−1 (48 % green, 40 % blue, 12 % grey).

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

74

[1]

Alcamo, J., Flörke, M., and Märker, M.: Future long-term changes in global water resources driven by socio-economic and climatic changes, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 52(2), 247–275, 2007. 10.1623/hysj.52.2.247

[2]

Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., and Smith, M.: Crop evapotranspiration: guidelines for computing crop water requirements, FAO Drainage and Irrigation Paper 56, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, 1998.

[3]

Determination of the density and the viscosities of biodiesel–diesel fuel blends

Ertan Alptekin, Mustafa Canakci

Renewable Energy 10.1016/j.renene.2008.02.020

[4]

Batjes, N. H.: ISRIC-WISE derived soil properties on a 5 by 5 arc-minutes global grid, Report 2006/02, ISRIC – World Soil Information, Wageningen, The Netherlands, available at: www.isric.org, 2006.

[5]

Chapagain, A. K. and Hoekstra, A. Y.: Water footprints of nations, Value of Water Research Report Series No. 16, UNESCO-IHE, Delft, The Netherlands, 2004.

[6]

Chapagain, A. K., Hoekstra, A. Y., Savenije, H. H. G., and Gautam, R.: The water footprint of cotton consumption: an assessment of the impact of worldwide consumption of cotton products on the water resources in the cotton producing countries, Ecol. Econ., 60(1), 186–203, 2006. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.11.027

[7]

Critchley, W. and Siegert, K.: Water harvesting: A manual for the design and construction of water harvesting schemes for plant production, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, 1991.

[8]

De Willigen, P.: An analysis of the calculation of leaching and denitrification losses as practised in the NUTMON approach, Plant Research International, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2000.

[9]

Döll, P. and Siebert, S.: Global modelling of irrigation water requirements. Water Resour. Res., 38(4), 1037, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001WR000355, 2002. 10.1029/2001wr000355

[10]

Doorenbos, J. and Kassam, A. H.: Yield response to water, FAO Drainage and Irrigation Paper 33, FAO, Rome, 1979. 10.1016/b978-0-08-025675-7.50021-2

[11]

Fader, M., Gerten, D., Thammer, M., Heinke, J., Lotze-Campen, H., Lucht, W., and Cramer, W.: Internal and external green-blue agricultural water footprints of nations, and related water and land savings through trade, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 8, 483–527, https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-8-483-2011, 2011. 10.5194/hessd-8-483-2011

[12]

FAO: Technical conversion factors for agricultural commodities, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, 2003.

[13]

FAO: Review of agricultural water use per country, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, available at: www.fao.org/nr/water/aquastat/water_use_agr/index.stm, 2005.

[14]

FAO: Fertilizer use by crop, FAO Fertilizer and Plant Nutrition Bulletin 17, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, 2006.

[15]

FAO: FAOSTAT on-line database, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, http://faostat.fao.org, last access: 10 October 2008a.

[16]

FAO: AQUASTAT on-line database, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, http://faostat.fao.org last access: 10 October 2008b.

[17]

FAO: Global map of monthly reference evapotranspiration – 10 arc minutes, GeoNetwork: grid database, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, http://www.fao.org/geonetwork/srv/en/resources.get?id=7416&fname=ref_evap_fao_10min.zip&access=private, last access: 15 October 2008c.

[18]

FAO: Global Information and Early Warning System (GIEWS) – Crop calendar tool, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, http://lprapp08.fao.org/fenix-portal last access: 15 October 2008d.

[19]

FAO: FertiStat – Fertilizer use statistics. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, www.fao.org/ag/agl/fertistat/, last access: 10 February 2009.

[20]

Gerbens-Leenes, P. W., Hoekstra, A. Y., and Van der Meer, T. H.: The water footprint of bio-energy: Global water use for bio-ethanol, bio-diesel, heat and electricity, Value of Water Research Report Series No. 29, UNESCO-IHE, Delft, The Netherlands, 2008a.

[21]

Gerbens-Leenes, P. W., Hoekstra, A. Y., and Van der Meer, T.H.: Water footprint of bio-energy and other primary energy carriers, Value of Water Research Report Series No. 34, UNESCO-IHE, Delft, The Netherlands, 2008b.

[22]

Gerbens-Leenes, W., Hoekstra, A. Y., and Van der Meer, T. H.: The water footprint of bioenergy, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106(25), 10219–10223, 2009. 10.1073/pnas.0812619106

[23]

Gleick, P. H. (Ed.): Water in crisis: A guide to the world's fresh water resources, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1993.

[24]

Gleick, P. H.: The changing water paradigm: a look at twenty-first century water resources development, Water Inter., 25(1),127–138, 2000. 10.1080/02508060008686804

[25]

[26]

[27]

Heffer, P.: Assessment of Fertilizer Use by Crop at the Global Level 2006/2007-2007/2008. International Fertilizer Industry Association, Paris, 2009.

[28]

Hoekstra, A. Y. (Ed.): Virtual water trade: Proceedings of the International Expert Meeting on Virtual Water Trade, Delft, The Netherlands, 12–13 December 2002, Value of Water Research Report Series No. 12, UNESCO-IHE, Delft, The Netherlands, 2003.

[29]

Hoekstra, A. Y. and Chapagain, A. K.: Water footprints of nations: water use by people as a function of their consumption pattern, Water Resour. Manag., 21(1), 35–48, 2007. 10.1007/s11269-006-9039-x

[30]

Hoekstra, A. Y. and Chapagain, A. K.: Globalization of water: Sharing the planet's freshwater resources, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK, 2008. 10.1002/9780470696224

[31]

Hoekstra, A. Y. and Hung, P. Q.: Virtual water trade: A quantification of virtual water flows between nations in relation to international crop trade. Value of Water Research Report Series No. 11, UNESCO-IHE, Delft, The Netherlands, 2002.

[32]

Hoekstra, A. Y., Chapagain, A. K., Aldaya, M. M., and Mekonnen, M. M.: The water footprint assessment manual: Setting the global standard, Earthscan, London, UK, 2011.

[33]

Hoff, H., Falkenmark, M., Gerten, D., Gordon, L., Karlberg, L., and Rockström, J.: Greening the global water system, J. Hydrol., 384, 177–186, 2010. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.026

[34]

Hutson, S. S., Barber, N. L., Kenny, J. F., Linsey, K. S., Lumia, D. S., and Maupin, M. A.: Estimated Use of Water in the United States in 2000, USGS Circular 1268, US Geological Survey, Reston, USA, available at: http://water.usgs.gov/watuse, last access: 15 February 2010, 2004. 10.3133/cir1268

[35]

IFA: International Fertilizer Industry Association Databank, www.fertilizer.org/ifa/ifadata/results, last access: 24 September 2009.

[36]

L'vovich, M. I., White, G. F., and Turner, B. L. I.: Use and transformation of terrestrial water systems, in: The earth as transformed by human action: Global and regional changes in the biosphere over the past 300 years edited by: Turner II, B. L., Clark, W. C, Kates, R. W., Richards, J. F., Mathews, J. T., and Meyer, W. B., Cambridge University Press, New York, 235–252, 1990.

[37]

Liu, J. and Yang, H.: Spatially explicit assessment of global consumptive water uses in cropland: green and blue water, J. Hydrol., 384, 187–197, 2010. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.11.024

[38]

Liu, J., Yang, H., and Savenije, H. H. G.: China's move to higher-meat diet hits water security, Nature, 454, p. 397, 2008. 10.1038/454397a

[39]

Liu, J., Zehnder, A. J. B., and Yang, H.: Global consumptive water use for crop production: The importance of green water and virtual water, Water Resour. Res., 45, W05428, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006051, 2009. 10.1029/2007wr006051

[40]

Liu, J., You, L., Amini, M., Obersteiner, M., Herrero, M., Zehnder, A. J. B., and Yang, H.: A high-resolution assessment on global nitrogen flows in cropland, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107(17), 8035–8040, 2010. 10.1073/pnas.0913658107

[41]

Mekonnen, M. M. and Hoekstra, A. Y.: A global and high-resolution assessment of the green, blue and grey water footprint of wheat, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 12590–1276, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-1259-2010, 2010. 10.5194/hess-14-1259-2010

[42]

Mitchell, T. D. and Jones, P. D.: An improved method of constructing a database of monthly climate observations and associated high-resolution grids, Int. J. Climatol., 25, 693–712, available at: http://cru.csi.cgiar.org/continent_selection.asp, last access: 3 October 2008, 2005. 10.1002/joc.1181

[43]

Monfreda, C., Ramankutty, N., and Foley, J. A.: Farming the planet: 2. Geographic distribution of crop areas, yields, physiological types, and net primary production in the year 2000, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 22, GB1022, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GB002947, available at: www.geog.mcgill.ca/landuse/pub/Data/175crops2000/, last access: 18 September 2008. 10.1029/2007gb002947

[44]

Perry, C.: Efficient irrigation; inefficient communication; flawed recommendations, Irrig. and Drain., 56, 367–378, https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.323, 2007. 10.1002/ird.323

[45]

Pimentel, D., Houser, J., Preiss, E., White, O. Fang, H., Mesnick, L., Barsky, T., Tariche, S., Schreck, J., and Alpert, S.: Water resources: Agriculture, the environment, and society, BioScience, 47(2), 97–106, 1997. 10.2307/1313020

[46]

Pimentel, D., Berger, B., Filiberto, D., Newton, M., Wolfe, B., Karabinakis, E., Clark, S., Poon, E., Abbett, E., and Nandagopal, S.: Water resources: Agricultural and environmental issues, BioScience, 54(10), 909–918, 2004. 10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0909:wraaei]2.0.co;2

[47]

Portmann, F. T., Siebert, S., and Döll, P.: Mirca2000 – global monthly irrigated and rainfed crop areas around the year 2000: A new high-resolution data set for agricultural and hydrological modelling, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 24(1), GB1011, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GB003435, available at: http://www.geo.uni-frankfurt.de/ipg/ag/dl/forschung/MIRCA/data_download/index.html, last access: 15 October 2009, 2010. 10.1029/2008gb003435

[48]

Postel, S. L., Daily, G. C., and Ehrlich, P. R.: Human appropriation of renewable freshwater, Science, 271(5250), 785–788, 1996. 10.1126/science.271.5250.785

[49]

Reynolds, C. A., Yitayew, M., Slack, D. C., Hutchinson, C. F., Huete, A., and Petersen, M. S.: Estimating crop yields and production by integrating the FAO Crop Specific Water Balance model with real-time satellite data and ground-based ancillary data, Int. J. Remote Sens., 21(18), 3487–3508, 2000. 10.1080/014311600750037516

[50]

Rockström, J. and Barron, J.: Water productivity in rainfed systems: overview of challenges and analysis of opportunities in water scarcity prone savannahs, Irrigation Sci., 25(3), 299–311, 2007. 10.1007/s00271-007-0062-3

Showing 50 of 74 references

Cited By

1,779

Improving nutritional life cycle assessment: From bioavailability to systemic modelling gaps for protein-rich foods

Vincent Desaulniers Brousseau, Caroline Thum · 2026

Cleaner Food Systems

Spatial-sectoral dynamics and drivers of the water footprint in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area

Chengyan Li, Zhenna Yi · 2026

Journal of Cleaner Production

Uncertainty of water footprint estimates caused by harvested area inputs

Betelhem W Demeke, Mesfin M Mekonnen · 2026

Environmental Research: Water

Agricultural water footprint: trends, gaps and pathways to achieving sustainability goals

Boris Apolo-Masache, Luis Dominguez-Granda · 2026

Cleaner Environmental Systems

Blue-green water footprint estimation of wheat-maize cropping pattern in the North-Western Upper Gangetic Plains, India

Himani Bisht, Shaloo · 2026

Discover Sustainability

Water footprint concept, approaches, and applications: A comprehensive review for the agricultural sector

Muhammed Sungur Demir, Abdullah Muratoglu · 2025

Water and Environment Journal

Sustainable strategies for the valorization of cotton and cotton blended waste: pathways to circular economy

Tarun Grover, Lijing Wang · 2025

Cellulose

Evaluating greenhouse gas mitigation through alternate wetting and drying irrigation in Colombian rice production

Sandra Loaiza, Louis Verchot · 2024

Agriculture, Ecosystems & Envir...

Harnessing Speed Breeding in Controlled Environment Ecosystem for Millets Sustainability

Avinash Sharma, Himanshu Pandey · 2024

Plant Breeding

Assessment of Crop Water Footprint and Actual Agricultural Water Consumption in Arid Inland Regions: A Case Study of Aksu Region

Jiali Ma, Pei Zhang · 2024

Sustainability

Predicting Green Water Footprint of Sugarcane Crop Using Multi-Source Data-Based and Hybrid Machine Learning Algorithms in White Nile State, Sudan

Rogaia H. Al-Taher, Mohamed Abuarab · 2024

Water

Water footprints and crop water use of 175 individual crops for 1990–2019 simulated with a global crop model

Oleksandr Mialyk, Joep F. Schyns · 2024

Scientific Data

Water Footprint and Water Sustainability of Agroindustrial Avocado Production in a Warm Tropical Climate Municipality: A Case Study in the Michoacan Avocado Belt in Central México

Diana J. Fuerte-Velázquez, Alberto Gómez-Tagle · 2024

Water

Sustainability of Hospital Catering Services: Water and Carbon Footprint

Hatice Baygut, Saniye Bilici · 2024

Akademik Gıda

A bibliometrics review of hotspots in water footprint research based on co-words network analysis

Yun Sun, Zhibin Wang · 2022

Frontiers in Environmental Science

Environmental footprint of critical agro-export products in the Peruvian hyper-arid coast: A case study for green asparagus and avocado

Xavier Esteve-Llorens, Diana Ita-Nagy · 2022

Science of The Total Environment

Bibliometric and Visual Analysis of Crop Water Footprint: A Widely Used Agricultural Water Resources Evaluation Method

Jianfeng Xiao, Jia Wei · 2022

Water

Historical simulation of maize water footprints with a new global gridded crop model ACEA

Oleksandr Mialyk, Joep F. Schyns · 2022

Hydrology and Earth System Sciences

The Environmental Footprint Associated With the Mediterranean Diet, EAT-Lancet Diet, and the Sustainable Healthy Diet Index: A Population-Based Study

Sigal Tepper, Meidad Kissinger · 2022

Frontiers in Nutrition

Environmental and human health trade-offs in potential Chinese dietary shifts

Yixin Guo, Pan He · 2022

One Earth

Metrics

1,779

Citations

74

References

Details

Published: May 25, 2011
Vol/Issue: 15(5)
Pages: 1577-1600
License: View

Authors

Cite This Article

M. M. Mekonnen, A. Y. Hoekstra (2011). The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crop products. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15(5), 1577-1600. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1577-2011

The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crop products

You May Also Like