On the nature of the perception-production link: Individual variability in English sibilant-vowel coarticulation

Alan C. L. Yu

doi:10.5334/labphon.97

journal article Open Access Jan 01, 2019

On the nature of the perception-production link: Individual variability in English sibilant-vowel coarticulation

Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology Vol. 10 No. 1 · Open Library of the Humanities

View at Publisher Save 10.5334/labphon.97

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

80

[1]

American Psychiatric Association (2013) 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596

[2]

Evidence for phonetic and social selectivity in spontaneous phonetic imitation

Molly Babel

Journal of Phonetics 2012 10.1016/j.wocn.2011.09.001

[3]

Variability in American English s-retraction suggests a solution to the actuation problem

Adam Baker, Diana Archangeli, Jeff Mielke

Language Variation and Change 2011 10.1017/s0954394511000135

[4]

"The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ): Evidence from asperger syndrome/high-functioning autism, males, females, scientists and mathematicians" Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders (2001) 10.1023/a:1005653411471

[5]

"lme4 [Computer software manual]. (R package version 0.999375-38)" (2011)

[6]

"A coarticulatory path to sound change" Language (2009) 10.1353/lan.0.0165

[7]

"The time course of individuals’ perception of coarticulatory information is linked to their production: Implications for sound change" Language (2018)

[8]

"Language-specific patterns of vowel-to-vowel coarticulation: Acoustic structures and their perceptual correlates" Journal of Phonetics (2002) 10.1006/jpho.2002.0177

[9]

"Perceptual confusions and phonological change: How confused is the listener?" (1998)

[10]

"Perception of coarticulatory nasalization by speakers of English and Thai: Evidence for partial compensation" Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (1999) 10.1121/1.428111

[11]

The time course of perception of coarticulation

Patrice Speeter Beddor, Kevin B. McGowan, Julie E. Boland et al.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2013 10.1121/1.4794366

[12]

Blacklock, O. S. 2004. Characteristics of variation in production of normal and disordered fricatives, using reduced-variance spectral methods (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). School of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

[13]

"The perception of voice onset time: An fMRI investigation of phonetic category structure" Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (2005) 10.1162/0898929054985473

[14]

"Perception of speech reflects optimal use of probabilistic speech cues" Cognition (2008) 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.04.004

[15]

"Unmasking the acoustic effects of vowel-to-vowel coarticulation: A statistical modeling approach" Journal of Phonetics (2010) 10.1016/j.wocn.2009.08.004

[16]

"Subcategorical mismatch and the time course of lexical access: Evidence for lexical competition" Language and Cognitive Processes (2001)

[17]

"Diadochokinetic rate and accuracy in autism spectrum disorders" (2011)

[18]

(2012)

[19]

"Compensation for coarticulation reflects gesture perception, not spectral contrast" Perception & Psychophysics (2006) 10.3758/bf03193666

[20]

"Perceptual parsing of acoustic consequences of velum lowering from information of vowels" Perception & Psychophysics (2000) 10.3758/bf03212058

[21]

(2013) 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573745.003.0003

[22]

"Interspeaker variation in the extent and perception of long-distance vowel-to-vowel coarticulation" Journal of Phonetics (2009) 10.1016/j.wocn.2009.01.002

[23]

"Perception of long-distance coarticulation: An event-related potential and behavioral study" Applied Psycholinguistics (2012) 10.1017/s0142716411000105

[24]

"Compensation for coarticulation, /u/-fronting, and sound change in standard southern British: An acoustic and perceptual study" Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (2008) 10.1121/1.2897042

[25]

"logistf [Computer software manual]. (R package version 1.22)" (2016)

[26]

"Sensorimotor adaptation of speech 1: Compensation and adaptation" Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research (2002) 10.1044/1092-4388(2002/023)

[27]

"Spectral properties of fricative consonants" Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (1956) 10.1121/1.1908271

[28]

I.C.D-10 (1994)

[29]

"Articulatory–acoustic kinematics: The production of American English /s/" Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (2011) 10.1121/1.3514537

[30]

"Hand, mouth and brain" Journal of Consciousness Studies (1999)

[31]

Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives

Allard Jongman, Ratree Wayland, Serena Wong

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2000 10.1121/1.1288413

[32]

Kataoka, R. 2011. Phonetic and cognitive bases of sound change (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Berkeley.

[33]

"Partial compensation for altered auditory feedback: A tradeoff with somatosensory feedback?" Language and Speech (2011)

[34]

"Individual differences in categorical perception of speech: Cue weighting and executive function" Journal of Phonetics (2016)

[35]

"Contrast and covert contrast: The phonetic development of voiceless sibilant fricatives in English and Japanese toddlers" Journal of Phonetics (2009) 10.1016/j.wocn.2008.10.001

[36]

The motor theory of speech perception revised

Alvin M. Liberman, Ignatius G. Mattingly

Cognition 1985 10.1016/0010-0277(85)90021-6

[37]

"Articulatory feature-based pronunciation modeling" Computer Speech & Language (2016) 10.1016/j.csl.2015.07.003

[38]

"Putting phonetic context effects into context: Commentary on Fowler (2005)" Perception & Psychophysics (2006) 10.3758/bf03193667

[39]

Mahler, B. A. 2012. Comparing motor speech skills of children with high functioning autism versus those of typically developing children using diadochokinetic tasks (Unpublished master’s thesis). The Ohio State University.

[40]

"Anticipatory coarticulation facilitates word recognition in toddlers" Cognition (2015) 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.05.009

[41]

"Influence of vocalic context on perception of the [∫]-[s] distinction" Perception & Psychophysics (1980) 10.3758/bf03204377

[42]

"Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination" Cognition (2002) 10.1016/s0010-0277(01)00157-3

[43]

"What information is necessary for speech categorization? Harnessing variability in the speech signal by integrating cues computed relative to expectations" Psychological Review (2011) 10.1037/a0022325

[44]

"Gradient effects of within-category phonetic variation on lexical access" Cognition (2002) 10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00157-9

[45]

"Individual-level contact limits phonological complexity: Evidence from bunched and retroflex /ɹ/" Language (2016) 10.1353/lan.2016.0019

[46]

(2014)

[47]

"Loose lips and silver tongues, or, projecting sexual orientation through speech" Language and Linguistic Compass (2007) 10.1111/j.1749-818x.2007.00028.x

[48]

"The perceptual consequences of within-talker variability in fricative production" Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (2001) 10.1121/1.1348009

[49]

Specificity and abstractness of VOT imitation

Kuniko Nielsen

Journal of Phonetics 2011 10.1016/j.wocn.2010.12.007

[50]

"Children learn separate aspects of speech production at different rates: Evidence from spectral moments" Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (1995) 10.1121/1.412278

Showing 50 of 80 references

Metrics

17

Citations

80

References

Details

Published: Jan 01, 2019
Vol/Issue: 10(1)
License: View

Authors

A

Alan C. L. Yu

Cite This Article

Alan C. L. Yu (2019). On the nature of the perception-production link: Individual variability in English sibilant-vowel coarticulation. Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/labphon.97

On the nature of the perception-production link: Individual variability in English sibilant-vowel coarticulation

You May Also Like