Abstract
Effective management of a dairy farm has to focus on individual animal apart from group or herd management since 'smallest production unit in the dairy is the individual animal’. In this context, precision dairy farming (PDF) aims to manage the basic production unit in order to exploit its maximal production capacity. PDF is the use of information and technology based farm management system to measure physiological, behavioural and production indicators of individual animals to improve management strategies, profitability and farm performance. PDF applications are finding their way on dairy farms, although there seem to be differences in the uptake of PDF applications between dairy systems. The authors have attempted to identify different PDF tools utilized across the globe and have highlighted the status of adoption in Indian scenario by highlighting about few farms/organizations involved in its utilization and uptake over the years. In this direction, the authors have also focused on several benefits and challenges faced by developing countries including India since the benefits are often not immediately apparent and they require more management expertise along with an investment of time and money to realize. In addition, the adoption rate depends on various factors like farmer education, farm size, perceptions of risk, ownership of a non-farm business etc. Addressing these issues is very essential for the uptake of technologies and hence, an effort has been made to propose strategies for adoption and operationalization of PDF in India and other developing countries where the similar scenario exists. The study also highlights that PDF in many developing countries including India is in its infancy, but there are tremendous opportunities for improvements in individual animal and herd management in dairy farms. The progressive farmers or the farmers’ groups, with guidance from the public and private sectors, and professional associations, can adopt it on a limited scale as the technology shows potential for raising yields and economic returns on fields with significant variability, and for minimizing environmental degradation. Additional research needs to be undertaken to examine the adoption process for not only successful adoption of technology, but also to solve the issues associated with the technology adoption. Further, right extension approaches and advisory services for the farmers interested in PDF needs to be undertaken for its effective application under different socio-economic and ecological conditions.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
84
[1]
Aalseth E. 2005. Fresh cow management: What is important, what does it cost, and what does it return?. In: Proceedings of the 7th Western Dairy Management Conference, Reno, NV. pp: 1–12.
[2]
Aware A M and Kshirsagar U A. 2017. Design of milkotester for fat and CLR measurement using Arduino microcontroller. International Advanced Research Journal in Science, Engineering and Technology 4(5): 13–16. 10.17148/iarjset.2017.4503
[3]
Babalobi O O. 2007. Veterinary geographic information systems applications in Nigeria: limitations, challenges and needs. Veterinaria Italiana 43(3): 491–99.
[4]
Banhazi T M, Lehr H, Black J L, Crabtree H, Schofield P, Tscharke M and Berckmans D. 2012. Precision livestock farming: an international review of scientific and commercial aspects. International Journal of Agriculture and Biological Engineering 5(3): 1–9.
[5]
Batte M T and Arnholt M W. 2003. Precision farming adoption and use in Ohio: case studies of six leading-edge adopters. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 38(2): 125–39. 10.1016/s0168-1699(02)00143-6
[6]
Beauchemin K and Penner G. 2009. New Developments in Understanding Ruminal Acidosis in Dairy Cows. Tri-State Dairy Nutrition Conference. April 21 and 22, 2009. pp. 1–12
[7]
Bell C J. 2002. Internet Delivery of Short Courses for Farmers: A case study of a course on Precision Agriculture. Publication No. 02/085, Project No. GOC-1A, A report for the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation.
[8]
Berger R and Hovav A. 2013. Using a dairy management information system to facilitate precision agriculture: The case of the AfiMilk® System. Information Systems Management 30(1): 21–34. 10.1080/10580530.2013.739885
[9]
Bewley J. 2009. Precision Dairy Farming: Opportunities, Challenges, and Solutions. The Dairy Practices Council, 40th Annual Conference held at Latham, NY during 4–6th November, 2009.
[10]
Bewley J and Schutz M M. 2009. Potential of Using New Technology for Estimating Body Condition Scores. Eighteenth Annual Tri-State Dairy Nutrition Conference, Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA. pp. 24–37.
[11]
Bewley J. 2010. Precision Dairy Farming: Advanced Analysis Solutions for Future Profitability. In: First North American Conference on Precision Dairy Management, Toranto, Canada during 2–5 March, 2010
[12]
Bewley J. 2013. New technologies in precision dairy management. WCDS Advances in Dairy Technology 25: 141–59.
[13]
Bewley J. 2016. Opportunities for monitoring and improving animal welfare using precision dairy monitoring technologies. Journal of Animal Science 94(2): 11. 10.2527/msasas2016-023
[14]
Borchers M R and Bewley J M. 2015. An assessment of producer precision dairy farming technology use, prepurchase considerations, and usefulness. Journal of Dairy Science 98: 4198–4205. 10.3168/jds.2014-8963
[15]
Bos J M, Bovenkerk B, Feindt P H and van Dam Y K. 2018. The quantified animal: Precision livestock farming and the ethical implications of objectification. Food Ethics 2: 77–92. 10.1007/s41055-018-00029-x
[16]
Brosh A, Henkin Z, Ungar E D, Dolev A, Orlov A, Yehuda Y and Aharoni Y. 2006. Energy cost of cows’ grazing activity: use of the heart rate method and the Global Positioning System for direct field estimation. Journal of Animal Science 84(7): 1951–67. 10.2527/jas.2005-315
[17]
Driessen C and Heutinck L. 2015. Cows desiring to be milked? Milking robots and the co-evolution of ethics and technology on Dutch dairy farms. Agriculture and Human Values 32(1): 3–20. 10.1007/s10460-014-9515-5
[18]
Eastwood C, Chapman D and Paine M. 2004. Precision dairy farming-taking the microscope to dairy farm management.
[19]
Eastwood C and Jago J. 2012. Precision dairy farming in New Zealand and Australia: A discussion document for trans- Tasman collaboration between Dairy NZ and Dairy Australia. Report produced for Dairy NZ and Dairy Australia. Rural Innovation Research Group, University of Melbourne.
[20]
Eastwood C, Chapman D and Paine M. 2012. Networks of practice for co-construction of agricultural decision support systems: Case studies of precision dairy farms in Australia. Agricultural Systems 108: 10–18. 10.1016/j.agsy.2011.12.005
[21]
Eastwood C, Jago J, Edwards J and Burke J. 2015. Getting the most out of advanced farm management technologies: Roles of technology suppliers and dairy industry organisations in supporting precision dairy farmers. Animal Production Science 56: 1752–60. 10.1071/an141015
[22]
Eastwood C R, Klerkx L and Nettle R. 2017. Dynamics and distribution of public and private research and extension roles for technological innovation and diffusion: Case studies of the implementation and adaptation of precision farming technologies. Journal of Rural Studies 49: 1–12. 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.11.008
[23]
Eastwood C R, Klerkx L, Ayre M and Dela Rue B. 2019. Managing socio-ethical challenges in the development of smart farming: from a fragmented to a comprehensive approach for responsible research and innovation. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 32: 741–68. 10.1007/s10806-017-9704-5
[24]
Edwards J L and Tozer P R. 2004. Using activity and milk yield as predictors of fresh cow disorders. Journal of Dairy Science 87: 524–31. 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(04)73192-6
[25]
Edwards J P, Dela Rue B T and Jago J G. 2015. Evaluating rates of technology adoption and milking practices on New Zealand dairy farms. Animal Production Science 55: 702–09. 10.1071/an14065
[26]
Eigenberg R A, Brown-Brandl T M and Nienaber J A. 2008. Sensors for dynamic physiological measurements. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 62(1): 41–47. 10.1016/j.compag.2007.08.011
[27]
Endres M. 2017. Automated calf feeder systems: What we learned from farms in the upper Midwest USA. Conference on Precision Dairy Farming held at Hyatt Regency, Lexington, KY during May 30–June 1, 2017. pp. 112.
[28]
Endres M. 2018. 74 automated milk feeders for pre-weaned dairy calves in the upper midwest United States. Journal of Animal Science 96(2): 38–39. 10.1093/jas/sky073.072
[29]
Friggens N C and Chagunda M G G. 2005. Prediction of the reproductive status of cattle on the basis of milk progesterone measures: model description. Theriogenology 64: 155–90. 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.11.014
[30]
Friggens N C, Ridder C and Lovendahl P. 2007. On the use of milk composition measures to predict the energy balance of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 90: 5453–67. 10.3168/jds.2006-821
[31]
Gans C. 2017. Edge Computing and Dairy Farming: Opportunities and Challenges. Conference on Precision Dairy Farming held at Hyatt Regency, Lexington, KY during May 30–June 1, 2017. pp. 112.
[32]
Ghose A, Dey J and Dwary P. 2019. Application of GIS on small farm and dairy management: SARSA Green, Durgapur, West- Bengal. Available at https: //www.geospatialworld.net/article/application-of-gis-on-small-farm-and-dairy-managementsarsa-green-durgapur-west-bengal/.
[33]
Gonzalez L, Tolkamp B, Coffey M and Ferret A. 2008. Changes in feeding behaviour as possible indicators for the automatic monitoring of health disorders in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 91(3): 1017–28. 10.3168/jds.2007-0530
[34]
Grieve D G, Korver S, Rijpkema Y S and Hof G. 1986. Relationship between milk composition and some nutritional parameters in early lactation. Livestock Production Science 14: 239–54. 10.1016/0301-6226(86)90083-7
[35]
Hamrita T K, Hamrita S K, Van Wicklen G, Czarick M and Lacy M P. 1997. Use of biotelemetry in measurement of animal responses to environmental stressors. ASAE Paper 97-4008. ASAE, St. Joseph, MI.
[36]
Heuer C, Van Straalen W M, Schukken Y H, Dirkzwager A and Noordhuizen J P T M. 2001. Prediction of energy balance in high yielding dairy cows with test-day information. Journal of Dairy Science 84: 471–81. 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(01)74497-9
[37]
Higgins V, Bryant M, Howell A and Battersby J. 2017. Ordering adoption: Materiality, knowledge and farmer engagement with precision agriculture technologies. Journal of Rural Studies 55: 193–202. 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.08.011
[38]
Hogeveen H. 2017. The value of precision dairy farming: Going beyond labor savings. Conference on Precision Dairy Farming held at Hyatt Regency, Lexington, KY during May 30–June 1, 2017. pp. 112.
[39]
Holdsworth R J and Markillie N A R. 1982. Evaluation of pedometers for estrus detection in dairy cows. Veterinary Record 111: 16–16. 10.1136/vr.111.1.16
[40]
INAPH-NDDB. 2019. Information Network for Animal Productivity & Health (INAPH). Available at http: //inaph.nddb.coop/Index.aspx Johnson C P and Johnson J. 2001. GIS: A Tool for Monitoring and Management of Epidemics. Map India 2001 Conference, New Delhi, February 2001.
[41]
Kamphuis C, Steeneveld W and Hogeveen H. 2015. Economic modelling to evaluate the benefits of precision livestock farming technologies. Pages 87–94 in Precision Farming Applications. I. Halachmi (ed.). Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, the Netherlands. EAAP/EU-PLF joint Conference, 25–27 August 2014, Copenhagen, Denmark. 10.3920/978-90-8686-815-5_3.2
[42]
Khatun M, Clark C, Lyons N, Thomson P, Kerrisk K and Garcia S. 2017. Early detection of clinical mastitis from electrical conductivity data in an automatic milking system. Animal Production Science, 57: 1226–32. 10.1071/an16707
[43]
Kuip A. 1987. Animal Identification. Third Symposium Automation in Dairying, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp. 12–17.
[44]
Laca E A. 2009. Precision livestock production: tools and concepts. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 38: 123–32. 10.1590/s1516-35982009001300014
[45]
Lovendahl P and Chagunda M G G. 2010. On the use of physical activity monitoring for estrus detection in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 93: 249–59. 10.3168/jds.2008-1721
[46]
Lukas J M, Reneau J K, Wallace R, Hawkins D and Munoz-Zanzi C. 2009. A novel method of analyzing daily milk production and electrical conductivity to predict disease onset. Journal of Dairy Science 92: 5964–76. 10.3168/jds.2009-2066
[47]
Maatje K, Rossing W and Wiersma F. 1987. Temperature and activity measurements for oestrus and sickness detection in dairy cattle. Third Symposium on Automation in Dairying, Wageningen, the Netherlands. pp. 239–49
[48]
Maltz E. 2000. Precision agriculture in dairying: individual management by automatic milking systems. Robotic milking: Proceedings of the International Symposium held in Lelystad, The Netherlands, 17–19 August, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
[49]
Mandal D and Ghosh S K. 2000. Precision farming – The emerging concept of agriculture for today and tomorrow. Current Science 79: 1644–47.
[50]
Mazrier H, Tal S, Aizinbud E and Bargai U. 2006. A field investigation of the use of the pedometer for the early detection of lameness in cattle. Canadian Veterinary Journal 47(9): 883– 86.

Showing 50 of 84 references

Metrics
8
Citations
84
References
Details
Published
Jan 06, 2021
Vol/Issue
90(8)
Pages
1083-1094
Cite This Article
PRAKASH KUMAR RATHOD, SREENATH DIXIT (2021). Precision dairy farming: Opportunities and challenges for India. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 90(8), 1083-1094. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v90i8.109207