journal article Open Access Sep 30, 2020

Karl Pearsons chi-square tests

View at Publisher Save 10.5897/err2019.3817
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
17
[1]
Black F (1993). Beta and return. Journal of Portfolio Management 20:8-18.
[2]
elik A, zdemir EY (2011). The relationship between the proportional reasoning skills of primary school students and their ability to form a ratio-proportion problem. Pamukkale niversitesi Eğitim Fakltesi Dergisi 30(1):1-11.
[3]
Franke TM, Ho T, Christie CA (2012). The chi-square test: Often used and more often misinterpreted. American Journal of Evaluation 33(3):448-458.
[4]
Gay LR (1976). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application. Ohio, Bell Howell Company.
[5]
Gow ID, David FL, Peter CR (2016). Causal inference in accounting research. Journal ofAccounting Research 54:477-523.
[6]
Grant MJ, Booth A (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26(2):91-108.
[7]
Karagz Y (2010). Nonparametrik tekniklerin g ve etkinlikleri. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 33:1-23.
[8]
Kothari CR (2007). Quantitative techniques. New Delhi, UBS Publishers Ltd.
[9]
Koul L (1984). Methodologies of educational research. New Delhi, Vikas.
[10]
Magnello ME (2005). Karl Pearson and the origins of modern statistics: An elastician becomes a statistician. The New Zealand Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology P 1.
[11]
Mehotra DV, Chan IS, Berger RL (2003). A cautionary note on exact unconditional inference for a difference between two independent binomial proportions. Biometrics 59:441-450.
[12]
Moore JF (1994). Research methods and data analysis 1 hull: Institute of Education, University of Hull UK. pp. 9-126.
[13]
Mutai BK (2000). How to write quality research proposal: A complete and simplified recipe. New Delhi, Thelley Publications.
[14]
Onyango JO, Odebero SO (2009). Data analysis for educational and social research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Kenya Journal of Education Planning Economics and Management 1(1):44-53.
[15]
Paul M, Smith-Hunter A (2011). The ımpact of socıal, economıc and genetıc factors on studentsalcohol consumptıon decısıons. Academy of Information and Management Sciences Journal 14(2).
[16]
Pike GR (1999). The constant error of the halo in educational outcomes research. Research in Higher Education 40(1):61-86.
[17]
Wickens TD (1989). Multiple contingency tables analysis for the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cited By
111
Metrics
111
Citations
17
References
Details
Published
Sep 30, 2020
Vol/Issue
15(9)
Pages
575-580
Cite This Article
Sölpük Turhan Nihan (2020). Karl Pearsons chi-square tests. Educational Research and Reviews, 15(9), 575-580. https://doi.org/10.5897/err2019.3817