journal article
Open Access
Oct 15, 2025
Strategic Oversight of Enterprise Innovation and Investment Growth: A Narrative Review
Abstract
BACKGROUND
The management of innovation and investment activities plays a crucial role in addressing contemporary economic and technological challenges. Effective coordination of these processes is essential for promoting sustainable development and enhancing the competitiveness of enterprises. The study explores the interdependence of innovation and investment activities and their influence on business growth.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The research is based on narrative review of current trends, theoretical approaches, and practical aspects of innovation and investment development management. It synthesizes relevant literature and policy documents, alongside an assessment of enterprise-level practices, to identify key management priorities and strategic directions.
RESULTS
The study highlights major challenges in managing innovation and investment activities, including market volatility, technological shifts, and limited access to funding. It emphasizes the strategic importance of attracting external partners and investors to support technology implementation, mitigate risks, and enhance innovation efficiency. The role of financial management in aligning innovation with broader enterprise strategies is also underscored.
CONCLUSION
Effective management of innovation and investment activities requires an integrated strategic approach that considers financial planning, stakeholder engagement, and technological advancement. Enhancing these processes can strengthen the competitive position of enterprises, particularly in rapidly changing market environments. The study provides practical recommendations for improving innovation and investment development management in line with sustainable growth goals.
The management of innovation and investment activities plays a crucial role in addressing contemporary economic and technological challenges. Effective coordination of these processes is essential for promoting sustainable development and enhancing the competitiveness of enterprises. The study explores the interdependence of innovation and investment activities and their influence on business growth.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The research is based on narrative review of current trends, theoretical approaches, and practical aspects of innovation and investment development management. It synthesizes relevant literature and policy documents, alongside an assessment of enterprise-level practices, to identify key management priorities and strategic directions.
RESULTS
The study highlights major challenges in managing innovation and investment activities, including market volatility, technological shifts, and limited access to funding. It emphasizes the strategic importance of attracting external partners and investors to support technology implementation, mitigate risks, and enhance innovation efficiency. The role of financial management in aligning innovation with broader enterprise strategies is also underscored.
CONCLUSION
Effective management of innovation and investment activities requires an integrated strategic approach that considers financial planning, stakeholder engagement, and technological advancement. Enhancing these processes can strengthen the competitive position of enterprises, particularly in rapidly changing market environments. The study provides practical recommendations for improving innovation and investment development management in line with sustainable growth goals.
Topics
No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →
References
49
[1]
Akton S, Demir E, Esteban, J, Garcia-Gomez C. How Does Uncertainty Affect Corporate Investment Inefficiency? Evidence from Europe. Res. Int. Bus. Fin. 2022;62(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101752
10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101752
[2]
Sanford A, Yang M.-J. Corporate investment and growth opportunities: The role of R&D-capital complementarity. J. Corp. Fin. 2022;72:102130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.102130
10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.102130
[3]
Kramarenko K. Features of formation of strategy of innovative-investment development of enterprises. Sci View Econ Manag. 2020;3(69):58–61.
10.32836/2521-666x/2020-69-10
[4]
Kłosok-Bazan I, Machnik-Słomka I. Meaning of sustainable development in innovation management in enterprises. Econ Environ Stud. 2017;17(43):515–25. https://doi.org/10.25167/ees.2017.43.4
10.25167/ees.2017.43.4
[5]
Chikán, A., Sprague, L.G. A life cycle model of major innovations in operations management. Int J Qual Innov 2019;5:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40887-019-0030-z
10.1186/s40887-019-0030-z
[6]
Zaman M, Tanewski G. R&D investment, innovation, and export performance: An analysis of SME and large firms. J. Small Buss. Manag. 2024;62(6):3053–3086. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2023.2291363
10.1080/00472778.2023.2291363
[7]
Garrido-Prada P, Romero-Jordan, D, Delgado-Rodriguez M. Exploring SMEs’ innovation investment strategy to increase innovation output in economic crises. J. Eng. Tech. Manag. 2024;72:101816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2024.101816
10.1016/j.jengtecman.2024.101816
[8]
Simone G, Evangelista R, Pianta, M. Profits, innovation, investment. Exploring the virtuous circle. Ital Econ J. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40797-024-00281-7
10.1007/s40797-024-00281-7
[9]
Mironova N, Koptieva H, Liganenko I, Sakun A, Chernyak D. Modelling the selection of innovative strategy for development of industrial enterprises. WSEAS Trans Bus Econ. 2022;19:278–91. https://doi.org/10.37394/23207.2022.19.26
10.37394/23207.2022.19.26
[10]
Asgari A, Asgari R Designing circular innovation ecosystems: insights from stakeholders, values, and investment policies. Front. Sustain. 2023;4:1197688. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2023.1197688
10.3389/frsus.2023.1197688
[11]
Konietzko J. Business innovation toward a circular economy: an ecosystem perspective. A+ BE Architect. Built Environ. 2020;22:1–204. https://doi.org/10.7480/abe.2020.22.5470
10.7480/abe.2020.22.5470
[12]
Friant MC, Vermeulen WJ, Salomone R. Analysing European Union circular economy policies: words vs. actions. Sustain. Prod. Consump. 2021;27:337–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.11001
10.1016/j.spc.11001
[13]
Hsieh YC, Lin KY, Lu C, Rong K. Governing a sustainable business ecosystem in Taiwan’s circular economy: the story of spring pool glass. Sustainability. 2017;9:1068. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9061068
10.3390/su9061068
[14]
Kazancoglu Y, Kazancoglu I, Sagnak M. A new holistic conceptual framework for green supply chain management performance assessment based on circular economy. J. Clean. Prod. 2018;195:1282–1299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.06015
10.1016/j.jclepro.06015
[15]
Neto J, Figueltedo C, Gabriel B, Valente R. Factors for innovation ecosystem frameworks: Comprehensive organizational aspects for evolution. Tech Forecast Sic Change. 2024;203:123383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123383
10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123383
[16]
Ghobakhloo M, Iranmanesh M, Grybauskas A, Vilkas M, Petraitė M. Industry 4.0, innovation, and sustainable development: A systematic review and a roadmap to sustainable innovation. Bus Strateg Environ. 2021;30:4237–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2867
10.1002/bse.2867
[17]
Sakun AZh, Perevozova IV, Kartashova OH, Prystemskyi OS, Mokhnenko AS. Innovative paradigm of management accounting and development of controlling in the entrepreneurship. Univ J Account Finance. 2021;9(4):548–64. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujaf.2021.090403
10.13189/ujaf.2021.090403
[18]
Khan I, Ahmad M, Majava J. Industry 4.0 innovations and their implications: An evaluation from sustainable development perspective. J. Clean, Prod. 2023;405:137006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137006
10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137006
[19]
Sytnyk HP, Zubchyk OA, Orel MH. Conceptual understanding of the peculiarities of managing innovation-driven development of the state in the current conditions. Sci Innov. 2022;18(2):3–15. https://doi.org/10.15407/scine18.02.003
10.15407/scine18.02.003
[20]
Kalina I, Khurdei V, Shevchuk V, Vlasiuk T, Leonidov I. Introduction of a corporate security risk management system: The experience of Poland. J Risk Financ Manag. 2022;15(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15080335
10.3390/jrfm15080335
[21]
Rosati F, Rodrigues VP, Cosenz F, Li-Ying J. Business model innovation for the Sustainable Development Goals. Bus Strateg Environ. 2022:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3334
10.1002/bse.3334
[22]
Phonthanukitithaworn C, Srisathan WA, Ketkaew C, Naruetharadhol P. Sustainable development towards openness SME innovation: Taking advantage of intellectual capital, sustainable initiatives, and open innovation. Sustainability. 2023;15(3):2126. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032126
10.3390/su15032126
[23]
Hrabchuk I, Buhaichuk V, Aliabieva V. Strategy of innovative development of the enterprise. Econ Soc. 2022;44. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2022-44-84
10.32782/2524-0072/2022-44-84
[24]
Equity structure and corporate innovation performance: Evidence from Chinese high-tech companies
Hesheng Chen, Sijia Qiao, Kegong Zhang
Heliyon
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39470
[25]
European Commission. EU companies top US and China counterparts in R&D investment growth, breaking decade-long trend. Press Release. 2024. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_24_6440
[26]
Kim J, Lee H. How does corporate innovation affect sustainable business investment”, Sustainability. 2023;15(18):13367. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813367
10.3390/su151813367
[27]
Rana A. Debata B. Role of corporate innovation and uncertainty in determining corporate investment of the firm: does financial constraint, executive risk preference and firm risk-taking ability play any role. J. Ind. Bis. Res. 2025;17(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JIBR-09-2023-0288
10.1108/jibr-09-2023-0288
[28]
Sumets A, Kniaz S, Heorhiadi N, Skrynkovskyy R, Matsuk V. Methodological toolkit for assessing the level of stability of agricultural enterprises. Agric Resour Econ. 2022;8(1):235–55. https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2022.08.01.12
10.51599/are.2022.08.01.12
[29]
Yermachenko V, Bondarenko D, Akimova L, Karpa M, Akimov O, Kalashnyk N. Theory and practice of public management of smart infrastructure in the conditions of the digital society’ development: Socio-economic aspects. Econ Aff (New Delhi). 2023;68(1):617–33. https://doi.org/10.46852/0424-2513.1.2023.29
10.46852/0424-2513.1.2023.29
[30]
Lou Zh, Chen S, Yin W, Zhang Ch, Yu X. Economic policy uncertainty and firm innovation: Evidence from a risk-taking perspective. Int. Rev. Econ. Fin. 2022;77:78–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2021.09.014
10.1016/j.iref.2021.09.014
[31]
Zavarská Z, Bykova, A, Grieveson R, Guadagno F. Toward Innovation-driven Growth: Innovation Systems and Policies in EU Member States of Central Eastern Europe. The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies. 2024. Research Report 476.
[32]
Makedon V. Myachin V. Plakhotnik O. Fisunenko N. Mykhailenko O. Construction of a model for evaluating the efficiency of technology transfer process based on a fuzzy logic approach. Eas-Europ J of Ent Tech, 2024;2(13(128):47–57. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.300796.
10.15587/1729-4061.2024.300796
[33]
Tang Sh, Cao X. How economic uncertainty affect enterprises’ strategic orientation. Int Rev Econ Fin. 2025;101:104127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104127
10.1016/j.iref.2025.104127
[34]
Shafiullah M, Miah MD, Alam MS, Atif M. Does economic policy uncertainty affect renewable energy consumption?. Renewabl Energy. 2021;179:1500–21.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.07.092
10.1016/j.renene.2021.07.092
[35]
Chang CL. Extreme events, economic uncertainty and speculation on occurrences of price bubbles in crude oil futures. Energy Economics. 2024;130:107318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107318
10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107318
[36]
Guo J, Niu P, Tang Y. Economic uncertainty and its influence on religious participation: evidence from China. Applied Economics Letters. 2025:1–1. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2025.2472026
10.1080/13504851.2025.2472026
[37]
Yaghoubi Farani A, Karimi S, Sajedi M, Ataei P. The effect of environmental sustainability orientations and entrepreneurial orientations on the performance of greenhouses. Scientific Reports. 2024;14(1):2095. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-52062-y
10.1038/s41598-024-52062-y
[38]
Huang Z, Guo Z, Chen J, Huang J. Sharing weal and woe: Do geopolitical risks affect corporate innovation? A global supply chain perspective. Int Rev Fin Anal. 2025;106:104474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104474
10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104474
[39]
State Statistics Service of Ukraine. Available from: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua
[40]
State Statistics Service of Ukraine. Statistical Yearbook of Ukraine for 2019. Kyiv; 2019.
[41]
OECD. Strategy for the development of small and medium enterprises in Ukraine until 2020 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.oecd.org/global-relations/SMEPI-EaP-2020-Ukraine.pdf
[42]
Ministry of Energy of Ukraine. Which TPPs suffered due to the war in Ukraine [Internet]. n.d. Available from: https://www.unian.ua/economics/energetics/robota-tec-v-ukrajini-yaki-tec-postrazhdali-cherez-viynu-v-ukrajini-novini-sogodni-11763043.html
[43]
Pysarenko TV, Kvasha TK, Paladchenko OF, Molchanova IV, Kochetkova OP. Implementation of medium-term priority directions of innovation activity at the national level in 2021: Analytical note. Kyiv: UkrINTEI; 2022.
[44]
Makedon V. Trachova D. Myronchuk V. Opalchuk R. & Davydenko O. (2024). The development and characteristics of sustainable finance. In Hamdan A. (Ed.), Achieving sustainable business through AI, technology education and computer science (Studies in Big Data, Vol. 163:373–382). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-73632-2_31
10.1007/978-3-031-73632-2_31
[45]
Lelyk L, Olikhovskyi V, Mahas N, Olikhovska M. An integrated analysis of enterprise economy security. Decis Sci Lett. 2022;11(3):299–310. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.dsl.2022.2.003
10.5267/j.dsl.2022.2.003
[46]
Cui X, Wang Ch, Liao J, Fang Zh, Cheng F. Economic policy uncertainty exposure and corporate innovation investment: Evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Fin. J. 2022;67:101533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2021.101533
10.1016/j.pacfin.2021.101533
[47]
Jung S, Kwak G. Firm Characteristics, Uncertainty and Research and Development (R&D) Investment: The Role of Size and Innovation Capacity. Sustainability. 2018;10(5):1668. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051668
10.3390/su10051668
[48]
Mia MM, Rizwan S, Zayed NM, Nitsenko V, Miroshnyk O, Kryshtal H, Ostapenko R. The impact of green entrepreneurship on social change and factors influencing AMO theory. Systems. 2022;10(5):132. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/systems10050132
10.3390/systems10050132
[49]
Zhao Q, Sahari S. Economic policy uncertainty and corporate investment: The moderating effect of corporate social responsibility. Invest, Manag. Fin. Innov. 2025;33(2):1–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.22(2).2025.01
10.21511/imfi.22(2).2025.01
Metrics
2
Citations
49
References
Details
- Published
- Oct 15, 2025
- License
- View
Authors
Cite This Article
Ivan Vorobiov, Nadiia Vasylieva, Lesia Sakun, et al. (2025). Strategic Oversight of Enterprise Innovation and Investment Growth: A Narrative Review. Premier Journal of Science. https://doi.org/10.70389/pjs.100113
Related
You May Also Like
Artificial-Intelligence-Driven Precision Medicine in Cancer Treatment
Maya Hassane · 2024
3 citations