journal article Open Access Feb 27, 2019

The nectar report: quantitative review of nectar sugar concentrations offered by bee visited flowers in agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes

PeerJ Vol. 7 pp. e6329 · PeerJ
View at Publisher Save 10.7717/peerj.6329
Abstract
There is growing concern that some bee populations are in decline, potentially threatening pollination security in agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes. Among the numerous causes associated with this trend, nutritional stress resulting from a mismatch between bee nutritional needs and plant community provisioning has been suggested as one potential driver. To ease nutritional stress on bee populations in agricultural habitats, agri-environmental protection schemes aim to provide alternative nutritional resources for bee populations during times of need. However, such efforts have focused mainly on quantity (providing flowering plants) and timing (during flower-scarce periods), while largely ignoring the quality of the offered flower resources. In a first step to start addressing this information gap, we have used literature data to compile a comprehensive geographically explicit dataset on nectar quality (i.e., total sugar concentration), offered to bees both within fields (crop and weed species) as well as outside fields (wild species) around the globe. Social bees are particularly sensitive to nectar sugar concentrations, which directly impact calorie influx into the colony and consequently their fitness making it an important resource quality marker. We find that the total nectar sugar concentrations in general do not differ between the three plant communities studied. In contrast we find increased variability in nectar quality in the wild plant community compared to crop and weed community, which is likely explained by the increased phylogenetic diversity in this category of plants. In a second step we explore the influence of local habitat on nectar quality and its variability utilizing a detailed sunflower (
Helianthus annuus
L.) data set and find that geography has a small, but significant influence on these parameters. In a third step we identify crop groups (genera), which provide sub-optimal nectar resources for bees and suggest high quality alternatives as potential nectar supplements. In the long term this data set could serve as a starting point to systematically collect more quality characteristics of plant provided resources to bees, which ultimately can be utilized by scientist, regulators, NGOs and farmers to improve the flower resources offered to bees. We hope that ultimately this data will help to ease nutritional stress for bee populations and foster a data informed discussion about pollinator conservation in modern agricultural landscapes.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
35
[1]
Baker "Sugar concentrations in nectars from hummingbird flowers" Biotropica (1975) 10.2307/2989798
[2]
Bayer "Important crops of the world and their weeds. Scientific and common names, synonyms, and WSSA/WSSJ approved computer codes" (1992)
[3]
Biesmeijer "Parallel declines in pollinators and insect-pollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands" Science (2006) 10.1126/science.1127863
[4]
Brodschneider "Nutrition and health in honey bees" Apidologie (2010) 10.1051/apido/2010012
[5]
Brown "The conservation of bees: a global perspective" Apidologie (2009) 10.1051/apido/2009019
[6]
Cnaani "Flower choice and learning in foraging bumblebees: effects of variation in nectar volume and concentration" Ethology (2006) 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2006.01174.x
[7]
Corbet "Post-secretory determinants of sugar concentration in nectar" Plant, Cell & Environment (1979) 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1979.tb00084.x
[8]
Bee declines driven by combined stress from parasites, pesticides, and lack of flowers

Dave Goulson, Elizabeth Nicholls, Cristina Botías et al.

Science 2015 10.1126/science.1255957
[9]
Harder "Effects of nectar concentration and flower depth on flower handling efficiency of bumble bees" Oecologia (1986) 10.1007/bf00377639
[10]
Kim "Optimal concentrations in nectar feeding" Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (2011) 10.1073/pnas.1108642108
[11]
Lye "Assessing the value of Rural Stewardship schemes for providing foraging resources and nesting habitat for bumblebee queens (Hymenoptera: Apidae)" Biological Conservation (2009) 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.03.032
[12]
Maurizio (1980)
[13]
McGregor (1976)
[14]
Meyer "Patterns and processes in crop domestication: an historical review and quantitative analysis of 203 global food crops" New Phytologist (2012) 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04253.x
[15]
Michener (2000)
[16]
Moritz "Lost colonies found in a data mine: global honey trade but not pests or pesticides as a major cause of regional honeybee colony declines" Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment (2016) 10.1016/j.agee.2015.09.027
[17]
Ollerton "Extinctions of aculeate pollinators in Britain and the role of large-scale agricultural changes" Science (2014) 10.1126/science.1257259
[18]
Ollerton "How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals?" Oikos (2011) 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18644.x
[19]
Perret "Nectar sugar composition in relation to pollination syndromes in Sinningieae (Gesneriaceae)" Annals of Botany (2001) 10.1006/anbo.2000.1331
[20]
Phillips "Prioritising integrated landscape change through rural land stewardship for ecosystem services" Australasian Journal of Environmental Management (2005) 10.1080/14486563.2005.10648662
[21]
Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers

Simon G. Potts, Jacobus C. Biesmeijer, Claire Kremen et al.

Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2010 10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.007
[22]
Potts (2015)
[23]
R Core Team "R: a language and environment for statistical computing" (2013)
[24]
Roubik "Nectar selection by Melipona and Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) and the ecology of nectar intake by bee colonies in a tropical forest" Oecologia (1984) 10.1007/bf00379082
[25]
Roulston "What governs protein content of pollen: pollinator preferences, pollen–pistil interactions, or phylogeny?" Ecological monographs (2000)
[26]
The Role of Resources and Risks in Regulating Wild Bee Populations

T'ai H. Roulston, Karen Goodell

Annual Review of Entomology 2011 10.1146/annurev-ento-120709-144802
[27]
Scheper "Local and landscape-level floral resources explain effects of wildflower strips on wild bees across four European countries" Journal of Applied Ecology (2015) 10.1111/1365-2664.12479
[28]
Simidtschiev "Nektarproduktivität von Sonnenblumensorten, Hybriden und Linien verschiedener Herkunft" Die Biene (1988)
[29]
Vaudo "Macronutrient ratios in pollen shape bumble bee (Bombus impatiens) foraging strategies and floral preferences" Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2016) 10.1073/pnas.1606101113
[30]
Bee nutrition and floral resource restoration

Anthony D Vaudo, John F Tooker, Christina M Grozinger et al.

Current Opinion in Insect Science 2015 10.1016/j.cois.2015.05.008
[31]
Vaughan "Using Farm Bill programs for pollinator conservation. USDANRCS National Plant Data Center" (2008)
[32]
Waller "Evaluating responses of honey bees to sugar solutions using an artificial-flower feeder" Annals of the Entomological Society of America (1972) 10.1093/aesa/65.4.857
[33]
Westrich (1989)
[34]
Winfree "A meta-analysis of bees’ responses to anthropogenic disturbance" Ecology (2009) 10.1890/08-1245.1
[35]
Wykes "The preferences of honeybees for solutions of various sugars which occur in nectar" Journal of Experimental Biology (1952) 10.1242/jeb.29.4.511
Cited By
77
Metrics
77
Citations
35
References
Details
Published
Feb 27, 2019
Vol/Issue
7
Pages
e6329
License
View
Cite This Article
Tobias Pamminger, Roland Becker, Sophie Himmelreich, et al. (2019). The nectar report: quantitative review of nectar sugar concentrations offered by bee visited flowers in agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes. PeerJ, 7, e6329. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6329
Related

You May Also Like