Pubic Arch Angle Postural Mobility Evaluation in Different Patient's Positions for Clinical Research

Marco Siccardi; Alessia Selmin; Cristina Valle

doi:10.7759/cureus.75898

journal article Dec 17, 2024

Pubic Arch Angle Postural Mobility Evaluation in Different Patient's Positions for Clinical Research

Marco Siccardi Alessia Selmin Cristina Valle

Cureus · Springer Science and Business Media LLC

View at Publisher Save 10.7759/cureus.75898

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

20

[1]

Gangakhedkar GR, Kulkarni AP. Physiological changes in pregnancy. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2021, 25:S189-92. 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24039 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24039

[2]

Siccardi M, Valle C. Can the dynamic external pelvimetry test in late pregnancy reveal obstructed and prolonged labor? Results from a pilot study. Cureus. 2021, 13:e20566. 10.7759/cureus.20566 10.7759/cureus.20566

[3]

Gilboa Y, Kivilevitch Z, Spira M, Kedem A, Katorza E, Moran O, Achiron R. Pubic arch angle in prolonged second stage of labor: clinical significance. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013, 41:442-6. 10.1002/uog.12304 10.1002/uog.12304

[4]

Neri S, Di Pasquo E, Corrado NA, et al.. Correlation between bituberous diameter and mode of delivery in a cohort of low-risk nulliparous women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023, 287:75-9. 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.05.023 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.05.023

[5]

Martelli F, Youssef A, Capogna MV, et al.. Longitudinal changes of subpubic arch angle throughout pregnancy. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2020, 85:100-6. 10.1159/000504096 10.1159/000504096

[6]

Li J, Li Y, Ping R, Zhang Q, Chen HY, Lin D, Qi J. Biomechanical analysis of sacroiliac joint motion following oblique-pulling manipulation with or without pubic symphysis injury. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022, 10:960090. 10.3389/fbioe.2022.960090 10.3389/fbioe.2022.960090

[7]

Fruscalzo A, Cocco P, Londero AP, Gantert M. Low back pain during pregnancy and delivery outcomes. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2022, 226:104-11. 10.1055/a-1553-4856 10.1055/a-1553-4856

[8]

Kember AJ, Anderson JL, House SC, Reuter DG, Goergen CJ, Hobson SR. Impact of maternal posture on fetal physiology in human pregnancy: a narrative review. Front Physiol. 2024, 15:1394707. 10.3389/fphys.2024.1394707 10.3389/fphys.2024.1394707

[9]

Zhang S, Dumas G, Hemmerich A. Measurement of pubic symphysis width in different birthing positions using ultrasound. J Biomech. 2020, 113:110114. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.110114 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.110114

[10]

Dietz HP, Steensma AB. Which women are most affected by delivery-related changes in pelvic organ mobility?. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003, 10:15-8. 10.1016/s0301-2115(03)00155-6 10.1016/s0301-2115(03)00155-6

[11]

Kjeldsen LL, Blankholm AD, Jurik AG, Salvig JD, Maimburg RD. Pelvic capacity in pregnant women, identified using magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021, 100:1454-62. 10.1111/aogs.14168 10.1111/aogs.14168

[12]

Desseauve D, Pierre F, Fernandez A, Panjo H, Decatoire A, Lacouture P, Fradet L. Assessment of pelvic-lumbar-thigh biomechanics to optimize the childbirth position: an "in vivo" innovative biomechanical study. Sci Rep. 2019, 9:15968. 10.1038/s41598-019-52338-8 10.1038/s41598-019-52338-8

[13]

Siccardi M, Valle C, Di Matteo F. Dynamic external pelvimetry test in third trimester pregnant women: shifting positions affect pelvic biomechanics and create more room in obstetric diameters. Cureus. 2021, 13:e13631. 10.7759/cureus.13631 10.7759/cureus.13631

[14]

Borell U, Fernstrom I. The movements at the sacro-iliac joints and their importance to changes in the pelvic dimensions during parturtion. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1957, 36:42-57. 10.3109/00016345709158023 10.3109/00016345709158023

[15]

Reitter A, Daviss BA, Bisits A, et al.. Does pregnancy and/or shifting positions create more room in a woman's pelvis?. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014, 211:662.e1-9. 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.06.029 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.06.029

[16]

Zimerman AL, Moskovich M, Levi EB, Maymon R, Tobvin J, Betser M. McRoberts' maneuver increases fetal head angle of progression in second stage of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018, 52:545-7. 10.1002/uog.19003 10.1002/uog.19003

[17]

Siccardi M, Valle C, Angius V, Di Matteo F. Estimating the mobility of the Michaelis sacral rhombus in pregnant women. Cureus. 2020, 12:e7116. 10.7759/cureus.7116 10.7759/cureus.7116

[18]

Perlman S, Raviv-Zilka L, Levinsky D, Gidron A, Achiron R, Gilboa Y, Kivilevitch Z. The birth canal: correlation between the pubic arch angle, the interspinous diameter, and the obstetrical conjugate: a computed tomography biometric study in reproductive age women. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019, 32:3255-65. 10.1080/14767058.2018.1462322 10.1080/14767058.2018.1462322

[19]

Siccardi M, Valle C, Angius V, Di Matteo F. The 2D ultrasound can evaluate the sub-pubic arch angle in two different hip flexion degrees supine positions. Is the sub-pubic arch angle correlated to the external pelvic diameters in supine patients shifting leg positions?. J Perinat Med. 2021, 49:eA26-28.

[20]

Masoud AT, AbdelGawad MM, Elshamy NH, et al.. The effect of antenatal exercise on delivery outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2020, 49:101736. 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101736 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101736

Metrics

0

Citations

20

References

Details

Published: Dec 17, 2024

Authors

Cite This Article

Marco Siccardi, Alessia Selmin, Cristina Valle (2024). Pubic Arch Angle Postural Mobility Evaluation in Different Patient's Positions for Clinical Research. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.75898

Pubic Arch Angle Postural Mobility Evaluation in Different Patient's Positions for Clinical Research

You May Also Like