journal article Oct 18, 2020

Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern‐based qualitative analytic approaches

View at Publisher Save 10.1002/capr.12360
Abstract
Abstract

Thematic analysis methods, including the reflexive approach we have developed, are widely used in counselling and psychotherapy research, as are other approaches that seek to develop ‘patterns’ (themes, categories) across cases. Without a thorough grounding in the conceptual foundations of a wide variety of across‐case analytic approaches, and qualitative research more broadly—something rarely offered in counselling training—it can be difficult to understand how these differ, where they overlap, and which might be appropriate for a particular research project. Our aim in this paper is to support researchers in counselling and psychotherapy to select an appropriate across‐case approach for their research, and to justify their choice, by discussing conceptual and procedural differences and similarities between reflexive thematic analysis (TA) and four other across‐case approaches. Three of these are also widely used in counselling and psychotherapy research—qualitative content analysis, interpretative phenomenological analysis and grounded theory. The fourth—discourse analysis—is less widely used but importantly exemplifies the critical qualitative research tradition. We contextualise our comparative approach by highlighting the diversity
within
TA. TA is best thought of as a spectrum of methods—from types that prioritise coding accuracy and reliability to reflexive approaches like ours that emphasise the inescapable subjectivity of data interpretation. Although reflexive TA provides the point of comparison for our discussion of other across‐case approaches, our aim is not to promote reflexive TA as ‘best’. Rather, we encourage the knowing selection and use of analytic methods and methodologies in counselling and psychotherapy research.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
87
[1]
Birks M. (2015)
[2]
Boyatzis R. E. (1998)
[5]
Braun V. (2013)
[7]
Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis

Virginia Braun, Victoria Clarke

Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 10.1080/2159676x.2019.1628806
[8]
To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales

Virginia Braun, Victoria Clarke

Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 10.1080/2159676x.2019.1704846
[11]
Braun V. (2014)
[13]
A critical evaluation of the use of interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) in health psychology

Joanna M. Brocki, Alison J. Wearden

Psychology & Health 10.1080/14768320500230185
[16]
Chamberlain K. "Do you really need a methodology?" Qualitative Methods in Psychology Bulletin (2012)
[18]
Charmaz K. (2014)
[20]
Cho J. Y. "Reducing confusion about grounded theory and qualitative content analysis: Similarities and differences" The Qualitative Report (2014)
[23]
Dapkus M. A. "A thematic analysis of the experience of time" Personality Processes and Individual Differences (1985)
[27]
Forman J. (2008)
[28]
Fugard A. (2020)
[31]
Glaser B. (1992)
[32]
Glaser B. G. (1965)
[33]
Glaser B. G. (1967)
[37]
Hayes N. (2000)
[40]
Joffe H. (2012)
[45]
Lainson K. "Being both narrative practitioner and academic researcher: A reflection on what thematic analysis has to offer narratively informed research" International Journal of Narrative Therapy and Community Work (2019)

Showing 50 of 87 references

Cited By
2,394
Procedia Computer Science
Journal of Pain and Symptom Managem...
The Clinical Teacher
International Journal of LGBTQ+ You...
International Journal of Human-Comp...
Teaching and Learning in Nursing
Counselling and Psychotherapy Resea...
Metrics
2,394
Citations
87
References
Details
Published
Oct 18, 2020
Vol/Issue
21(1)
Pages
37-47
License
View
Cite This Article
Virginia Braun, Victoria Clarke (2020). Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern‐based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 21(1), 37-47. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12360