journal article Apr 28, 2016

Financial and Ecological Evaluation of Hydrogen Production Processes on Large Scale

View at Publisher Save 10.1002/ceat.201600023
Abstract
Abstract
Hydrogen is widely seen as energy carrier of the future. Different technologies are under development to produce hydrogen at competitive cost but with significantly reduced carbon footprint. Two conventional technologies, namely, methane steam reforming and coal gasification, are compared based on product cost and carbon footprint with four new technologies, i.e., metal‐oxide cycle, water electrolysis, biomass gasification, and methane pyrolysis. To evaluate the carbon footprint for methane pyrolysis, system extension and differential methods are applied. For the boundary conditions selected here, methane pyrolysis yields very good values for product cost and carbon footprint. Therefore, a cross industry technology development of methane pyrolysis was initiated.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
22
[3]
Arpe H. J. (2007)
[6]
M. Roper 7. BMBF‐Forum für Nachhaltigkeit Berlin November2010.
[7]
S. Joest M. Fichtner M. Wietschel U. Bünger C. Stiller P. Schmidt F. Merten Woher kommt der Wasserstoff in Deutschland bis 2050? Bundesministerium für Verkehr Bau und Stadtentwicklung Berlin2009.
[8]
Häussinger P. (2012)
[9]
Pregger T. (2008)
[10]
T. Smolinka M. Günther J. Garche Stand und Entwicklungspotenzial der Wasserelektrolyse zur Herstellung von Wasserstoff aus regenerativen Energien NOW‐Studie 1. Revision Nationale Organisation Wasserstoff‐ und Brennstoffzellentechnologie Berlin2011.
[11]
K. Patel B. Patel Biomass Gasification PERP Report 2013S11 Nexant Thinking San Francisco CA2013.
[13]
G. Kreysa D. W. Agar I. Schultz inProc. of the DGMK Conference The Future Role of Hydrogen in Petrochemistry and Energy Supply(Eds: S. Ernst et al.) DGMK Hamburg2010.
[14]
Lascon J. (2008)
[15]
Lascon J. (2008)
[16]
European reference Life‐Cycle Database(ELCD 3.0).http://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/?pape_id126
[17]
ecoinvent Database Swiss Center for Life Cycle Inventories Zürich.http://www.ecoinvent.org/database/
[18]
Kerdoncuff P. (2008)
[19]
J. Nitsch Ausbaustrategie Erneuerbare Energien – Leitstudie 2007 Bundesministerium für Umwelt Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit Berlin2007.
[20]
(2009)
[21]
C. Kost et al. Stromgestehungskosten Erneuerbare Energien Fraunhofer‐Institut für Solare Energiesysteme Freiburg November2013.
[22]
A. Bode D. W. Agar K. Büker V. Göke M. Hensmann U. Janhsen D. Klingler J. Schlichting S. A. Schunk inProc. of the World Hydrogen Energy Conference Gwangju June2014.
Metrics
92
Citations
22
References
Details
Published
Apr 28, 2016
Vol/Issue
39(6)
Pages
1185-1193
License
View
Cite This Article
Otto Machhammer, Andreas Bode, Wolfgang Hormuth (2016). Financial and Ecological Evaluation of Hydrogen Production Processes on Large Scale. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 39(6), 1185-1193. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.201600023