journal article Dec 18, 2007

Effects of hillslope topography on hydrological responses in a weathered granite mountain, Japan: comparison of the runoff response between the valley‐head and the side slope

Hydrological Processes Vol. 22 No. 14 pp. 2581-2594 · Wiley
Abstract
AbstractTo evaluate the effects of hillslope topography on storm runoff in a weathered granite mountain, discharge rate, soil pore water pressures, and water chemistry were observed on two types of hillslope: a valley‐head (a concave hillslope) and a side slope (a planar hillslope). Hydrological responses on the valley‐head and side slope reflected their respective topographic characteristics and varied with the rainfall magnitude. During small rainfall events (<35 mm), runoff from the side slope occurred rapidly relative to the valley‐head. The valley‐head showed little response in storm runoff. As rainfall amounts increased (35–60 mm), the valley‐head yielded a higher flow relative to the side slope. For large rainfall events (>60 mm), runoff from both hillslopes increased with rainfall, although that from the valley‐head was larger than that from the side slope. The differences in the runoff responses were caused by differences in the roles of lower‐slope soils and the convergence of the hillslope. During small rainfall events, the side slope could store little water; in contrast, all rainwater could be stored in the soils at the valley‐head hollow. As the amount of rainfall increased, the subsurface saturated area of the valley‐head extended from the bottom to the upper portion of the slope, with the contributions of transient groundwater via lateral preferential flowpaths due to the high concentration of subsurface water. Conversely, saturated subsurface flow did not contribute to runoff responses, and the subsurface saturated area at the side slope did not extend to the upper slope for the same storm size. During large rainfall events, expansion of the subsurface saturated area was observed in both hillslopes. Thus, differences in the concentration of subsurface water, reflecting hillslope topography, may create differences in the extension of the subsurface saturated area, as well as variability in runoff responses. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
47
[7]
Collaborative Research Group for the Granites around Lake Biwa "Granitic masses around Lake Biwa, southwest Japan. Part 5. The Tanakami Granite pluton" Earth Science (2000)
[13]
Hack JT "Geomorphology and forest ecology of a mountain region in the central Appalachians, Washington (DC)" United States, Geological Survey, Professional Papers (1960)
[16]
Hewlett JD (1967)
[19]
Jones JAA "Soil pipe networks; distribution and discharge" Cambria (1978)
[20]
Kirkby MJ (1970)
[21]
Kitahara N "Relationship of pipe flow to streamflow on a first order watershed" Journal of the Japanese Forest Society (1992)
[26]
Nishiguchi Y "An observation of spatial pore water pattern in a mountain hollow" Journal of the Japan Society of Erosion Control Engineering (2005)
[27]
Ohta T "Research on runoff from hillsides by one‐dimensional transient saturated‐unsaturated flow" Journal of the Japanese Forest Society (1983)
[32]
Takasao T "Incorporation of the effect of concentration of flow into the kinematic wave equations" Annuals of Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University (1981)
[33]
Tamura T (1996)
[40]
Tsukamoto Y (1982)
[45]
Woods R "The changing spatial variability of subsurface flow across a hillside" Journal. of Hydrology NZ (1996)
[47]
Yasuhara M "The role of groundwater in stormflow generation in a small forested watershed" Hydrology (1985)
Metrics
46
Citations
47
References
Details
Published
Dec 18, 2007
Vol/Issue
22(14)
Pages
2581-2594
License
View
Cite This Article
Masamitsu Fujimoto, Nobuhito Ohte, Makoto Tani (2007). Effects of hillslope topography on hydrological responses in a weathered granite mountain, Japan: comparison of the runoff response between the valley‐head and the side slope. Hydrological Processes, 22(14), 2581-2594. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6857