Comprehensive H2/O2 kinetic model for high‐pressure combustion

Michael P. Burke; Marcos Chaos; Yiguang Ju; Frederick L. Dryer; Stephen J. Klippenstein

doi:10.1002/kin.20603

journal article Dec 06, 2011

Comprehensive H2/O2 kinetic model for high‐pressure combustion

Michael P. Burke Marcos Chaos Yiguang Ju

Frederick L. Dryer Stephen J. Klippenstein

International Journal of Chemical Kinetics Vol. 44 No. 7 pp. 444-474 · Wiley

View at Publisher Save 10.1002/kin.20603

Abstract

AbstractAn updated H2/O2 kinetic model based on that of Li et al. (Int J Chem Kinet 36, 2004, 566–575) is presented and tested against a wide range of combustion targets. The primary motivations of the model revision are to incorporate recent improvements in rate constant treatment and resolve discrepancies between experimental data and predictions using recently published kinetic models in dilute, high‐pressure flames.Attempts are made to identify major remaining sources of uncertainties, in both the reaction rate parameters and the assumptions of the kinetic model, affecting predictions of relevant combustion behavior. With regard to model parameters, present uncertainties in the temperature and pressure dependence of rate constants for HO2 formation and consumption reactions are demonstrated to substantially affect predictive capabilities at high‐pressure, low‐temperature conditions. With regard to model assumptions, calculations are performed to investigate several reactions/processes that have not received much attention previously. Results from ab initio calculations and modeling studies imply that inclusion of H + HO2 = H2O + O in the kinetic model might be warranted, though further studies are necessary to ascertain its role in combustion modeling. In addition, it appears that characterization of nonlinear bath‐gas mixture rule behavior for H + O2(+ M) = HO2(+ M) in multicomponent bath gases might be necessary to predict high‐pressure flame speeds within ∼15%.The updated model is tested against all of the previous validation targets considered by Li et al. as well as new targets from a number of recent studies. Special attention is devoted to establishing a context for evaluating model performance against experimental data by careful consideration of uncertainties in measurements, initial conditions, and physical model assumptions. For example, ignition delay times in shock tubes are shown to be sensitive to potential impurity effects, which have been suggested to accelerate early radical pool growth in shock tube speciation studies. In addition, speciation predictions in burner‐stabilized flames are found to be more sensitive to uncertainties in experimental boundary conditions than to uncertainties in kinetics and transport. Predictions using the present model adequately reproduce previous validation targets and show substantially improved agreement against recent high‐pressure flame speed and shock tube speciation measurements. Comparisons of predictions of several other kinetic models with the experimental data for nearly the entire validation set used here are also provided in the Supporting Information. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Chem Kinet 44: 444–474, 2012

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

147

[1]

10.1016/0360-1285(84)90118-7

[2]

Richards G. A. (2009)

[3]

Chaos M. (2009)

[4]

10.1016/s0082-0784(00)80581-0

[5]

10.1021/ef060553g

[6]

10.1016/j.combustflame.2006.12.002

[7]

10.1016/j.combustflame.2007.06.013

[8]

10.1016/j.combustflame.2009.08.009

[9]

10.1016/j.proci.2010.05.021

[10]

10.1016/j.proci.2008.06.014

[11]

10.1002/kin.20180

[12]

10.1002/kin.20026

[13]

An optimized kinetic model of H2/CO combustion

Scott G. Davis, Ameya V. Joshi, Hai Wang et al.

Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 10.1016/j.proci.2004.08.252

[14]

10.1016/j.combustflame.2007.10.024

[15]

10.1016/j.proci.2006.07.193

[16]

10.1002/kin.20036

[17]

10.1016/j.combustflame.2005.10.004

[18]

Smith G. P.;Golden D. M.;Frenklach M.;Moriarty N. W.;Eiteneer B.;Goldenberg M.;Bowman C. T.;Hanson R. K.;Song S.;Gardiner W. C.Jr.;Lissianski V. V.;Qin Z.GRI‐MECH 3.0. Available athttp://www.me.berkeley.edu/gri_mech/ accessed 2009.

[19]

10.1016/j.combustflame.2010.10.002

[20]

10.1063/1.1748524

[21]

10.1063/1.459102

[22]

10.1039/b204364e

[23]

Burke M. P. "Fall Eastern States Section Technical Meeting of the Combustion Institute" University of Connecticut, Storrs (2011)

[24]

Wang H.;You X.;Joshi A. V.;Davis S. G.;Laskin A.;Egolfopoulos F. N.;Law C. K.USC Mech Version II. High‐Temperature Combustion Reaction Model of H2/CO/C1–C4Compounds. Available athttp://ignis.usc.edu/USC_Mech_II.htm; May 2007 accessed 2009.

[25]

10.1021/jp020229w

[26]

10.1016/s0082-0784(00)80542-1

[27]

10.1039/b010002l

[28]

10.1039/b404146a

[29]

10.1021/jp711800z

[30]

10.1063/1.2917201

[31]

10.1039/a908929b

[32]

10.1039/b804553d

[33]

10.1021/j100248a033

[34]

10.1021/jp065140v

[35]

Miller J. A. personal communication 2010.

[36]

10.1002/bbpc.19800840902

[37]

10.1063/1.447713

[38]

10.1021/j100464a019

[39]

10.1002/bbpc.19830870217

[40]

10.1002/bbpc.19830870218

[41]

10.1002/kin.20451

[42]

10.1016/j.proci.2010.05.101

[43]

10.1021/j100381a033

[44]

10.1021/j100338a058

[45]

10.1021/jp971416a

[46]

10.1002/aic.690321206

[47]

10.1002/(sici)1097-4601(1999)31:2<113::aid-kin5>3.0.co;2-0

[48]

10.1246/bcsj.80.1901

[49]

10.1039/f19797500140

[50]

10.1039/f19747000635

Showing 50 of 147 references

Cited By

922

Physics-constrained machine learning for the accelerated design of hydrogen explosion suppression materials

Yanbin Chen, Huahua Xiao · 2026

Process Safety and Environmental Pr...

Experimental determination and prediction methods of flammability limits of hydrogen

Haoran Zhao, Shikai Bao · 2026

International Journal of Hydrogen E...

A review of hydrogen dual-fuel combustion characteristics and emission properties

Jianbin Luo, Xiaojia Liang · 2026

Journal of the Energy Institute

Future of internal combustion engines using sustainable, scalable, and storable E-fuels and biofuels for decarbonizing transport and enabling advanced combustion technologies

Avinash Kumar Agarwal, Christine Mounaïm-Rousselle · 2025

Progress in Energy and Combustion S...

Recent progress and prospects of hydrogen combustion chemistry in the gas phase

Mingbo Niu, Jie Jian · 2025

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Re...

Turbulent combustion modeling for internal combustion engine CFD: A review

S. Posch, C. Gößnitzer · 2025

Progress in Energy and Combustion S...

Simulated-based combustion system development in a direct-injection spark-ignited hydrogen engine

Le Zhao, Anqi Zhang · 2025

Fuel

Comparative computational study of hydrogen and natural gas in high-pressure direct-injection (HPDI) compression-ignition engines: Combustion characteristics, thermal efficiency, and local pollutant and greenhouse gas emissions

Rafig Babayev, Mats Morén · 2025

Fuel

Real gas effects on the dynamics of a reactive diffusion layer: Application to the study of spontaneous ignition limit of pressurized hydrogen jet

Zifeng Weng, Yaqin Tan · 2024

Proceedings of the Combustion Insti...

Hydrogen pre-chamber combustion at lean-burn conditions on a heavy-duty diesel engine: A computational study

Xinlei Liu, Hammam Aljabri · 2023

Fuel

Local flame displacement speeds of hydrogen-air premixed flames in moderate to intense turbulence

Yuvraj, Wonsik Song · 2022

Combustion and Flame

Review on hydrogen safety issues: Incident statistics, hydrogen diffusion, and detonation process

Fuyuan Yang, Tianze Wang · 2021

International Journal of Hydrogen E...

TimeScale Analysis, Numerical Simulation and Validation of Flame Acceleration, and DDT in Hydrogen–Air Mixtures

Aditya Karanam, Sunil Ganju · 2020

Combustion Science and Technology

An investigation of GPU-based stiff chemical kinetics integration methods

Nicholas J. Curtis, Kyle E. Niemeyer · 2017

Combustion and Flame

From theoretical reaction dynamics to chemical modeling of combustion

Stephen J. Klippenstein · 2017

Proceedings of the Combustion Insti...

Challenges and perspectives of combustion chemistry research

Wenhao Yuan, Yuyang Li · 2017

Science China Chemistry

Equilibrium based analytical model for estimation of pressure magnification during deflagration of hydrogen air mixtures

A. Karanam, P. K. Sharma · 2016

Kerntechnik

Experimental and modeling study of the effect of elevated pressure on lean high-hydrogen syngas flames

M. Goswami, J.G.H. van Griensven · 2015

Proceedings of the Combustion Insti...

H2/air autoignition: The nature and interaction of the developing explosive modes

Dimitris J. Diamantis, Epaminondas Mastorakos · 2015

Combustion Theory and Modelling

Evaluation of Combustion Mechanisms Using Global Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analyses: A Case Study for Low‐Temperature Dimethyl Ether Oxidation

Alison S. Tomlin, Edirin Agbro · 2014

International Journal of Chemical K...

Metrics

922

Citations

147

References

Details

Published: Dec 06, 2011
Vol/Issue: 44(7)
Pages: 444-474
License: View

Authors

Stephen J. Klippenstein

Department of Chemistry, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106-7078

Cite This Article

Michael P. Burke, Marcos Chaos, Yiguang Ju, et al. (2011). Comprehensive H2/O2 kinetic model for high‐pressure combustion. International Journal of Chemical Kinetics, 44(7), 444-474. https://doi.org/10.1002/kin.20603

Comprehensive H2/O2 kinetic model for high‐pressure combustion

You May Also Like