journal article Aug 19, 2013

Joint feeder‐link bandwidth compaction and interference mitigation based on a hybrid space/ground processing architecture for a broadband multi‐beam satellite system

Abstract
SUMMARYIn a broadband multi‐beam satellite system, a hybrid space/ground processing has the potential to allow for a more efficient use of the feeder‐link spectral resources when the payload is equipped with a multi‐fed reflector antenna and the number of feeds exceeds the number of users to be served on‐ground. In conventional systems, where the processing burden is kept on‐ground to minimize payload complexity, the on‐ground and the space segments have to engage in extensive communication efforts on the feeder‐link to exchange the whole set of multiplexed feed signals. When spectral resources are scarce, an expensive multiple‐gateway (GW) infrastructure is required to cope with these communication efforts. As an alternative, this work suggests a hybrid architecture where the satellite and the GW are able to exchange a set of intermediate signals called feedlets, whose cardinality is smaller than the number of feeds. When this occurs, the satellite implements a fixed non‐adaptive processing called Coarse Beamforming (CB) to reconstruct feed signals from the subset of feedlets. Non‐adaptive processing keeps the payload complexity acceptable, while a gain is obtained in terms of feeder‐link bandwidth reduction. The objective of this paper is to study the implications of introducing a fixed processing scheme on‐board, the satellite for the Forward Link (FL) of a broadband multi‐beam satellite network. The first part of this work studies the effect of bandwidth compression on the quality of on‐board reconstructed feed signals.The second part focuses on the effect of coarse beamforming on the system's spectral efficiency and availability when adaptive precoding is implemented at the GW to allow for a full‐frequency‐reuse scheme. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
24
[1]
CottatellucciL DebbahM GallinaroG MüllerR NeriM RinaldoR.Interference mitigation techniques for broadband datellite systems Proc. 24th AIAA Int. Comm. Sat. Syst. Conf. (ICSSC): San Diego CA Jun.2006;1‐13. 10.2514/6.2006-5348
[2]
Litva J (1996)
[3]
AngelettiP AlaghaN.Space/ground beamforming techniques for emerging hybrid satellite terrestrial networks Proc. 27th AIAA Int. Comm. Sat. Syst. Conf. (ICSSC): Edinburgh UK Jun.2009;1‐6. 10.1049/cp.2009.1162
[4]
AngelettiP GallinaroG LisiM VernucciA.On‐ground digital beamforming techniques for satellite smart antennas Proc. 19th AIAA Int. Comm. Sat. Syst. Conf. (ICSSC): Toulouse France Apr.2001;1‐8.
[5]
DevillersB Pérez‐NeiraA MosqueraC.Joint linear precoding and beamforming for the forward link of multi‐beam broadband satellite systems Proc. IEEE Global Comm. Conf. (GLOBECOM): Houston TX Dec.2011;1‐6. 10.1109/glocom.2011.6133895
[6]
ThibaultI LombardoF CandrevaEA Vanelli CoralliA CorazzaGE.Coarse beamforming techniques for multi‐beam satellite networks Proc. Int. Conf. on Comm. (ICC): Ottawa Canada Jun.2012;3270‐3274. 10.1109/icc.2012.6364009
[7]
ESA private communication to SatNEx team members.
[8]
DiazMA CourvilleN MosqueraC LivaG CorazzaGE.Non‐linear interference mitigation for broadband multimedia satellite systems Proc. Int. Workshop on Sat. and Space Comm. (IWSSC): Salzburg Austria Sep.2007;61‐65. 10.1109/iwssc.2007.4409391
[9]
ZhengG ChatzinotasS OtterstenBE.Generic optimization of linear precoding in multi‐beam satellite systems 2011. arXiv:1109.0681v1.
[13]
FisherRF WindpassingerC LampeA HuberJB.MIMO precoding for decentralized receivers Proc. Int. Symposium on Info. Theory (ISIT): Lausanne Switzerland Jul.2002Jun.;496.
[14]
JohamM BrehmerJ UtschickW.MMSE approaches to multiuser spatio‐temporal Tomlinson‐Harashima precoding Proc. ITG FACHBERICHT 2004;387‐394.
[17]
Peel C "A vector perturbation technique for near capacity multiantenna multiuser communication ‐ Part I: channel inversion and regularization" IEEE Trans. on Comm. (2005) 10.1109/tcomm.2004.840638
[19]
CaireG DebbahM CottatellucciL De GaudenziR RinaldoR MuellerR GallinaroG.Perspectives of adopting interference mitigation techniques in the context of broadband multimedia satellite systems Proc. 23rd AIAA Int. Comm. Sat. Sys. Conf. (ICSSC): Rome Italy Sep.2005;1‐5.
[20]
ZhengD KarabinisP.Adaptive beamforming with interference suppression and multiuser detection in satellite systems with terrestrial reuse of frequencies Proc. IEEE 62nd Vehicular Tech. Conf. (VTC‐Fall) Vol. 4: Dallas TX Sep.2005;2637‐2641.
[21]
PoggioniM BerioliM BanelliP.BER performance of multi‐beam satellite systems with Tomlinson‐Harashima precoding Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Comm. (ICC): Dresden Germany Jun.2009;1‐6. 10.1109/icc.2009.5198782
[22]
ZorbaN RealpM Pérez‐NeiraA.An improved partial CSIT random beamforming for multi‐beam satellite systems Proc. 10th Int. Workshop on Sig. Processing for Space Comm. (SPSC): Rhodes Island Greece Oct.2008;1‐8. 10.1109/spsc.2008.4686703
[24]
DVB‐S2: Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB) user guidelines for the second generation system for broadcasting interactive services news gathering and other broadband satellite applications (DVB‐S2).Technical Report ETSI TR 102 376.
Metrics
7
Citations
24
References
Details
Published
Aug 19, 2013
Vol/Issue
32(2)
Pages
107-125
License
View
Funding
Spanish Government Award: TEC2010-17816 (JUNTOS)
Cite This Article
I. Thibault, B. Devillers, E.A. Candreva, et al. (2013). Joint feeder‐link bandwidth compaction and interference mitigation based on a hybrid space/ground processing architecture for a broadband multi‐beam satellite system. International Journal of Satellite Communications and Networking, 32(2), 107-125. https://doi.org/10.1002/sat.1042