Managing uncertainty in scientific argumentation

Ying‐Chih Chen; Matthew J. Benus; Jaclyn Hernandez

doi:10.1002/sce.21527

journal article Jun 11, 2019

Managing uncertainty in scientific argumentation

Ying‐Chih Chen

Matthew J. Benus Jaclyn Hernandez

Science Education Vol. 103 No. 5 pp. 1235-1276 · Wiley

View at Publisher Save 10.1002/sce.21527

Abstract

AbstractArgumentation is a core practice of science that inherently contains uncertainty. Relatively few studies have examined the role of uncertainty within argumentation and how teachers manage uncertainty leading to conceptual development. This design‐based, multiple‐case study employed the constant comparative method to analyze 24 videos focused on whole‐class discussion, examining how two middle‐school teachers created productive moments of uncertainty in an argumentative environment. Results showed that uncertainty in argumentation created productive moments for students to collaborate in dialogue and navigate their understanding of natural phenomena toward more coherent scientific explanations. Productively managing uncertainty was influenced by how the students’ epistemic understanding of argument was used as a resource to create a space to engage in social negotiation. Creating productive moments of uncertainty involved the teachers (a) raising uncertainty about an authentic, meaningful, and ambiguous phenomenon; (b) maintaining uncertainty through seeking the flaws, incoherences, and inconsistencies of an argument; and (c) reducing uncertainty by synthesizing and bridging what students had learned with what they were learning. As a resource, the epistemic understanding of argument is intertwined with the practice of social negotiation and depends both on the students’ degree of existing knowledge of dealing with uncertainty and the degree of their understanding of what counts as data, evidence, and reasoning.

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

183

[1]

Afifi T. D. &Afifi W. A.(Eds.). (2009).Uncertainty information management and disclosure decisions: Theories and applications. New York NY: Routledge.

[2]

10.1002/sce.21019

[3]

Asterhan C. S. (2013)

[4]

10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01017.x

[5]

10.1207/s15327809jls1301_1

[6]

We Be Burnin'!Agency, Identity, and Science Learning

Angela Calabrese Barton, Edna Tan

Journal of the Learning Sciences 10.1080/10508400903530044

[7]

10.1002/tea.20446

[8]

10.1080/09500693.2011.645086

[9]

10.1002/sce.20402

[10]

10.1002/sce.20420

[11]

10.1080/09500693.2014.924641

[12]

10.1002/sce.21220

[13]

Chen Y.‐C. "Using the science talk–writing heuristic to build a new era of scientific literacy" The Reading Teacher (2019)

[14]

10.1525/abt.2016.78.7.549

[15]

10.1002/sce.21067

[16]

10.1007/s11165-015-9506-6

[17]

10.1007/s11191-016-9811-0

[18]

10.1080/00368121.2014.915792

[19]

10.1080/07370008.2016.1145120

[20]

10.1080/10508406.2016.1204546

[21]

10.1002/tea.20171

[22]

10.1080/10508400903530036

[23]

10.1080/00461520.2011.587722

[24]

10.1002/tea.21166

[25]

Resources, Instruction, and Research

David K. Cohen, Stephen W. Raudenbush, Deborah Loewenberg Ball

Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 10.3102/01623737025002119

[26]

10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.004

[27]

10.1080/07370008.1985.9649008

[28]

10.3102/0091732x07309371

[29]

Duschl R. (2008)

[30]

Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges

Kathleen M. Eisenhardt, Melissa E. Graebner

Academy of Management Journal 10.5465/amj.2007.24160888

[31]

Guiding Principles for Fostering Productive Disciplinary Engagement: Explaining an Emergent Argument in a Community of Learners Classroom

Randi A. Engle, Faith R. Conant

Cognition and Instruction 10.1207/s1532690xci2004_1

[32]

10.1080/14926150902942072

[33]

10.1002/tea.21076

[34]

10.22329/il.v29i4.2907

[35]

10.1111/bjep.12078

[36]

Feynman R. P. (2009)

[37]

10.1080/07370008.2012.689383

[38]

10.3102/0091732x030001001

[39]

10.3102/978-0-935302-43-1_11

[40]

10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.08.005

[41]

10.1177/0022487109339906

[42]

10.1002/sce.21488

[43]

10.1007/s11191-017-9876-4

[44]

10.1002/sce.21057

[45]

Greeno J. G. (2006)

[46]

10.1002/sce.21484

[47]

10.1002/tea.21451

[48]

10.1080/09500693.2010.551551

[49]

10.1525/abt.2018.80.9.669

[50]

10.1007/s11165-015-9499-1

Showing 50 of 183 references

Cited By

102

Development and Validation of a Scale to Measure Student Dispositions Toward Scientific Uncertainty Navigation

Jongchan Park, Ying‐Chih Chen · 2026

Journal of Research in Science Teac...

An Integrative Framework for Navigating Uncertainty in Science Education

Simon Blauza, Kerstin Kremer · 2025

Journal of Research in Science Teac...

Exploring students’ engagement with inscription-based science practices from the perspective of epistemic (un)certainty

Amy Pallant, Gey-Hong Gweon · 2025

International Journal of Science Ed...

Science teachers' perceptions and practice of uncertainty in science learning: The changes experienced after engaging in a practice‐based professional development

Emily Starrett, Michelle Jordan · 2024

Journal of Research in Science Teac...

Teacher strategies to support student navigation of uncertainty: Considering the dynamic nature of scientific uncertainty throughout phases of sensemaking

Heesoo Ha, Ying‐Chih Chen · 2024

Science Education

Desirable uncertainty in science teaching: Exploring teachers’ perceptions and practice of using student scientific uncertainty as a pedagogical resource

Emily Starrett, Michelle Jordan · 2024

Teaching and Teacher Education

Navigating student uncertainty for productive struggle: Establishing the importance for and distinguishing types, sources, and desirability of scientific uncertainties

Ying‐Chih Chen, Michelle Jordan · 2024

Science Education

Student Uncertainty as a Pedagogical Resource (SUPeR): an approach for phenomena-based science teaching

Ying-Chih Chen, Jongchan Park · 2024

Science Activities: Classroom Proje...

Student Uncertainty as a Pedagogical Resource (SUPeR) approach for developing a new era of science literacy: practicing and thinking like a scientist

Ying‐Chih Chen, Michelle Jordan · 2023

Science Activities: Classroom Proje...

Developing deep learning in science classrooms: Tactics to manage epistemic uncertainty during whole‐class discussion

Ying‐Chih Chen, Ratrapee Techawitthayachinda · 2021

Journal of Research in Science Teac...

Using students’ epistemic uncertainty as a pedagogical resource to develop knowledge in argumentation

Ying‐Chih Chen, Xue Qiao · 2020

International Journal of Science Ed...

Finding the place of argumentation in science education: Epistemics and Whole Science

Douglas Allchin, Gábor Á. Zemplén · 2020

Science Education

Sealing the gateways for post-truthism: Reestablishing the epistemic authority of science

Dorothe Kienhues, Regina Jucks · 2020

Educational Psychologist

Dialogic Pathways to Manage Uncertainty for Productive Engagement in Scientific Argumentation

Ying‐Chih Chen · 2020

Science & Education

Metrics

102

Citations

183

References

Details

Published: Jun 11, 2019
Vol/Issue: 103(5)
Pages: 1235-1276
License: View

Authors

Y

Ying‐Chih Chen

Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College Arizona State University Tempe Arizona

M

Matthew J. Benus

School of Education Indiana University Northwest Gary Indiana

J

Jaclyn Hernandez

College of Education Western Oregon University Monmouth Oregon

Cite This Article

Ying‐Chih Chen, Matthew J. Benus, Jaclyn Hernandez (2019). Managing uncertainty in scientific argumentation. Science Education, 103(5), 1235-1276. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21527

Managing uncertainty in scientific argumentation

You May Also Like