journal article Feb 07, 2024

Teacher strategies to support student navigation of uncertainty: Considering the dynamic nature of scientific uncertainty throughout phases of sensemaking

Science Education Vol. 108 No. 3 pp. 890-928 · Wiley
View at Publisher Save 10.1002/sce.21857
Abstract
AbstractSensemaking has been advocated as a core practice of science education to support students in constructing their own understanding through a prolonged trajectory. However, the field lacks a discussion of teaching strategies that can better support students as they develop in the trajectory of sensemaking, which includes four phases: initial engagement with a driving question related to a target phenomenon; identification of incoherence and insufficiency in existing understanding; exploration of multiple resources to help develop plausible explanations; and synthesis of solutions and application of new understanding to interpret the target phenomenon. With the view that students' scientific uncertainty, including conceptual and epistemic uncertainties, can motivate or drive the trajectory of sensemaking coherent with students' understanding, this multiple case study examined how two science teachers, one from South Korea and one from the USA, supported students to navigate their scientific uncertainties to shape a trajectory of sensemaking that is coherent to them. Transcripts of video recordings of classroom discourses and student‐created artifacts were analyzed. We identified the dynamic nature of students' scientific uncertainties in the four phases and the teaching strategies in each phase. Three main findings emerged from this study: (1) student uncertainty as a key not only to initiate the trajectory of sensemaking meaningfully but also to continuously develop the trajectory along a coherent pathway, (2) conceptual and epistemic uncertainties having different roles in building different phases of sensemaking, and (3) teaching strategies that support student navigation of scientific uncertainty that drives the trajectory of sensemaking.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
127
[2]
Achieve (2017)
[4]
Ancona D. (2012)
[5]
Atkinson D. (2011)
[6]
Ausubel D. P (1968)
[8]
Bang M. (2017)
[18]
Chakravartty A. (2017)
[21]
Managing uncertainty in scientific argumentation

Ying‐Chih Chen, Matthew J. Benus, Jaclyn Hernandez

Science Education 10.1002/sce.21527
[23]
Student Uncertainty as a Pedagogical Resource (SUPeR) approach for developing a new era of science literacy: practicing and thinking like a scientist

Ying‐Chih Chen, Michelle Jordan

Science Activities: Classroom Projects and Curricu... 10.1080/00368121.2023.2281694
[29]
Cho H. "Exploring the role of collaborative reflection in small group argumentation: Focus on students' epistemic considerations and practices" Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education (2019)
[31]
Conlin L. D.(2013).Three views of an Aha! moment: Comparing tutorial groups' affective responses to a moment of sudden conceptual insight.Poster Presentation at 2013 Physics Education Research Conference. Portland OR.
[32]
Dewey J. (1933)
[39]
Erickson F. (1992)
[47]
Science education with multilingual learners: Equity as access and equity as transformation

Scott E. Grapin, Ashlyn Pierson, María González‐Howard et al.

Science Education 10.1002/sce.21791

Showing 50 of 127 references

Metrics
14
Citations
127
References
Details
Published
Feb 07, 2024
Vol/Issue
108(3)
Pages
890-928
License
View
Cite This Article
Heesoo Ha, Ying‐Chih Chen, Jongchan Park (2024). Teacher strategies to support student navigation of uncertainty: Considering the dynamic nature of scientific uncertainty throughout phases of sensemaking. Science Education, 108(3), 890-928. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21857
Related

You May Also Like