journal article Apr 14, 2003

Strategic planning in a turbulent environment: evidence from the oil majors

Strategic Management Journal Vol. 24 No. 6 pp. 491-517 · Wiley
Abstract
Abstract
The long‐running debate between the ‘rational design’ and ‘emergent process’ schools of strategy formation has involved caricatures of firms' strategic planning processes, but little empirical evidence of whether and how companies plan. Despite the presumption that environmental turbulence renders conventional strategic planning all but impossible, the evidence from the corporate sector suggests that reports of the demise of strategic planning are greatly exaggerated. The goal of this paper is to fill this empirical gap by describing the characteristics of the strategic planning systems of multinational, multibusiness companies faced with volatile, unpredictable business environments. In‐depth case studies of the planning systems of eight of the world's largest oil companies identified fundamental changes in the nature and role of strategic planning since the end of the 1970s. The findings point to a possible reconciliation of ‘design’ and ‘process’ approaches to strategy formulation. The study pointed to a process of planned emergence in which strategic planning systems provided a mechanism for coordinating decentralized strategy formulation within a structure of demanding performance targets and clear corporate guidelines. The study shows that these planning systems fostered adaptation and responsiveness, but showed limited innovation and analytical sophistication. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
83
[1]
AguilarFJ HamermeshRG BrainardCE.1993.General Electric Co.: 1984 Case 385315. Harvard Business School: Boston MA.
[2]
American Productivity and Quality Center (1996)
[3]
American Productivity and Quality Center (1996)
[4]
Perspective: Complexity Theory and Organization Science

Philip Anderson

Organization Science 10.1287/orsc.10.3.216
[6]
Ansoff HI (1965)
[8]
Baden‐Fuller C (1994)
[9]
Beinhocker ED "Robust adaptive strategies" Sloan Management Journal (1999)
[11]
Bower JL (1970)
[20]
Burns T (1961)
[21]
Business Week (1996)
[22]
Capon N (1987)
[23]
Chandler AD (1962)
[25]
Cleland DI (1976)
[27]
De Geus A "Planning as learning" Harvard Business Review (1988)
[28]
De Geus A (1997)
[33]
Eisenhardt KM "Strategy as simple rules" Harvard Business Review (2001)
[34]
Ewing DW "Looking around: long‐range business planning" Harvard Business Review (1956)
[35]
Gell‐Mann M (1994)
[38]
Grayson LE (1987) 10.1007/978-1-349-08412-8
[41]
Hamel G "Strategy as revolution" Harvard Business Review (1996)
[42]
Hamel G (2000)
[43]
Hamel G "Strategic intent" Harvard Business Review (1989)
[44]
Hamel G (1994)
[46]
Henry HW (1967)
[50]
Learned E (1965)

Showing 50 of 83 references

Cited By
592
Journal of Applied Juvenile Justice...
Strategic Management Journal
Journal of Small Business and Enter...
Technological Forecasting and Socia...
Sustainability
Technological Forecasting and Socia...
International Journal of Public Adm...
Strategic Management Journal
How to Build Reputation in Financial Markets

Pietro Mazzola, Davide Ravasi · 2006

Long Range Planning
Futures
Organization Studies
Metrics
592
Citations
83
References
Details
Published
Apr 14, 2003
Vol/Issue
24(6)
Pages
491-517
License
View
Cite This Article
Robert M. Grant (2003). Strategic planning in a turbulent environment: evidence from the oil majors. Strategic Management Journal, 24(6), 491-517. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.314
Related

You May Also Like

Dynamic capabilities and strategic management

David J. Teece, Gary Pisano · 1997

19,798 citations

A resource‐based view of the firm

Birger Wernerfelt · 1984

15,423 citations

Toward a knowledge‐based theory of the firm

Robert M. Grant · 1996

10,063 citations