journal article Open Access Jul 24, 2024

Healthcare leaders’ experiences of implementing artificial intelligence for medical history-taking and triage in Swedish primary care: an interview study

View at Publisher Save 10.1186/s12875-024-02516-z
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Artificial intelligence (AI) holds significant promise for enhancing the efficiency and safety of medical history-taking and triage within primary care. However, there remains a dearth of knowledge concerning the practical implementation of AI systems for these purposes, particularly in the context of healthcare leadership. This study explores the experiences of healthcare leaders regarding the barriers to implementing an AI application for automating medical history-taking and triage in Swedish primary care, as well as the actions they took to overcome these barriers. Furthermore, the study seeks to provide insights that can inform the development of AI implementation strategies for healthcare.

Methods
We adopted an inductive qualitative approach, conducting semi-structured interviews with 13 healthcare leaders representing seven primary care units across three regions in Sweden. The collected data were subsequently analysed utilizing thematic analysis. Our study adhered to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research to ensure transparent and comprehensive reporting.

Results
The study identified implementation barriers encountered by healthcare leaders across three domains: (1) healthcare professionals, (2) organization, and (3) technology. The first domain involved professional scepticism and resistance, the second involved adapting traditional units for digital care, and the third inadequacies in AI application functionality and system integration. To navigate around these barriers, the leaders took steps to (1) address inexperience and fear and reduce professional scepticism, (2) align implementation with digital maturity and guide patients towards digital care, and (3) refine and improve the AI application and adapt to the current state of AI application development.

Conclusion
The study provides valuable empirical insights into the implementation of AI for automating medical history-taking and triage in primary care as experienced by healthcare leaders. It identifies the barriers to this implementation and how healthcare leaders aligned their actions to overcome them. While progress was evident in overcoming professional-related and organizational-related barriers, unresolved technical complexities highlight the importance of AI implementation strategies that consider how leaders handle AI implementation in situ based on practical wisdom and tacit understanding. This underscores the necessity of a holistic approach for the successful implementation of AI in healthcare.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
77
[1]
Iserson KV, Moskop JC. Triage in medicine, part I: Concept, history, and types. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;49(3):275–81. 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.05.019
[2]
Kaminsky E, Röing M, Björkman A, Holmström IK. Telephone nursing in Sweden: a narrative literature review. Nurs Health Sci. 2017;19(3):278–86. 10.1111/nhs.12349
[3]
Bashshur RL, Howell JD, Krupinski EA, Harms KM, Bashshur N, Doarn CR. The empirical foundations of Telemedicine interventions in Primary Care. Telemed J E Health. 2016;22(5):342–75. 10.1089/tmj.2016.0045
[4]
Napier J, Clinch M. Job strain and retirement decisions in UK general practice. Occup Med (Lond). 2019;69(5):336–41. 10.1093/occmed/kqz075
[5]
Jia H, Yu X, Jiang H, Yu J, Cao P, Gao S, et al. Analysis of factors affecting medical personnel seeking employment at primary health care institutions: developing human resources for primary health care. Int J Equity Health. 2022;21(1):37. 10.1186/s12939-022-01638-z
[6]
Röing M, Rosenqvist U, Holmström IK. Threats to patient safety in telenursing as revealed in Swedish telenurses’ reflections on their dialogues. Scand J Caring Sci. 2013;27(4):969–76. 10.1111/scs.12016
[7]
Ernesäter A, Winblad U, Engström M, Holmström IK. Malpractice claims regarding calls to Swedish telephone advice nursing: what went wrong and why? J Telemed Telecare. 2012;18(7):379–83. 10.1258/jtt.2012.120416
[8]
Berntsson K, Eliasson M, Beckman L. Patient safety when receiving telephone advice in primary care - a Swedish qualitative interview study. BMC Nurs. 2022;21(1):24. 10.1186/s12912-021-00796-9
[9]
Abraham CM, Zheng K, Poghosyan L. Predictors and outcomes of Burnout among Primary Care providers in the United States: a systematic review. Med Care Res Rev. 2020;77(5):387–401. 10.1177/1077558719888427
[10]
Cecula P, Yu J, Dawoodbhoy FM, Delaney J, Tan J, Peacock I, et al. Applications of artificial intelligence to improve patient flow on mental health inpatient units - narrative literature review. Heliyon. 2021;7(4):e06626. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06626
[11]
Dawoodbhoy FM, Delaney J, Cecula P, Yu J, Peacock I, Tan J, et al. AI in patient flow: applications of artificial intelligence to improve patient flow in NHS acute mental health inpatient units. Heliyon. 2021;7(5):e06993. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06993
[12]
Boonstra A, Laven M. Influence of artificial intelligence on the work design of emergency department clinicians a systematic literature review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):669. 10.1186/s12913-022-08070-7
[13]
Jordan M, Hauser J, Cota S, Li H, Wolf L. The impact of Cultural Embeddedness on the implementation of an Artificial Intelligence Program at Triage: a qualitative study. J Transcult Nurs. 2023;34(1):32–9. 10.1177/10436596221129226
[14]
Scheder-Bieschin J, Blümke B, de Buijzer E, Cotte F, Echterdiek F, Nacsa J, et al. Improving Emergency Department patient-physician conversation through an Artificial Intelligence Symptom-taking Tool: mixed methods pilot observational study. JMIR Form Res. 2022;6(2):e28199. 10.2196/28199
[15]
Anthony C. To question or accept? How status differences influence responses to New Epistemic Technologies in Knowledge Work. Acad Manage Rev. 2018;43. 10.5465/amr.2016.0334
[16]
Knorr-Cetina K. Epistemic cultures: how the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press; 1999. 10.4159/9780674039681
[17]
Benbya H, Davenport T, Pachidi S. Artificial Intelligence in Organizations: current state and Future opportunities. MIS Q Exec. 2020;19:9–21.
[18]
Chen M, Decary M. Artificial intelligence in healthcare: an essential guide for health leaders. Healthc Manage Forum. 2019;33:084047041987312.
[19]
Nair M, Andersson J, Nygren JM, Lundgren LE. Barriers and enablers for implementation of an Artificial Intelligence-based decision Support Tool to reduce the risk of readmission of patients with heart failure: stakeholder interviews. JMIR Form Res. 2023;7:e47335. 10.2196/47335
[20]
The practical implementation of artificial intelligence technologies in medicine

Jianxing He, Sally L. Baxter, Jie Xu et al.

Nature Medicine 2019 10.1038/s41591-018-0307-0
[21]
Kawamura R, Harada Y, Sugimoto S, Nagase Y, Katsukura S, Shimizu T. Incidence of diagnostic errors among unexpectedly hospitalized patients using an Automated Medical History-taking System with a Differential diagnosis generator: Retrospective Observational Study. JMIR Med Inf. 2022;10(1):e35225. 10.2196/35225
[22]
Gottliebsen K, Petersson G. Limited evidence of benefits of patient operated intelligent primary care triage tools: findings of a literature review. BMJ Health Care Inf. 2020;27(1). 10.1136/bmjhci-2019-100114
[23]
Service EPR. Artificial intelligence in healthcare: Applications, risks, and ethical and societal impacts 2022.
[24]
Gama F, Tyskbo D, Nygren J, Barlow J, Reed J, Svedberg P. Implementation Frameworks for Artificial Intelligence Translation Into Health Care Practice: scoping review. J Med Internet Res. 2022;24(1):e32215. 10.2196/32215
[25]
Toward Successful Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care Practice: Protocol for a Research Program

Petra Svedberg, Julie Reed, Per Nilsen et al.

JMIR Research Protocols 2022 10.2196/34920
[26]
Shaw J, Rudzicz F, Jamieson T, Goldfarb A. Artificial Intelligence and the implementation challenge. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(7):e13659. 10.2196/13659
[27]
Longo F. Implementing managerial innovations in primary care: can we rank change drivers in complex adaptive organizations? Health Care Manage Rev. 2007;32(3):213–25. 10.1097/01.hmr.0000281620.13116.ce
[28]
Oborn E, Barrett M, Barrett D. Beware of the pendulum swing: how leaders can sustain rapid technology innovation beyond the COVID-19 crisis. BMJ Lead. 2020;5:leader–2020.
[29]
Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP, Greener J, Maclennan G, Ibbotson T, Kahan JP, et al. Is the involvement of opinion leaders in the implementation of research findings a feasible strategy? Implement Sci. 2006;1:3. 10.1186/1748-5908-1-3
[30]
Hammerton M, Benson T, Sibley A. Readiness for five digital technologies in general practice: perceptions of staff in one part of southern England. BMJ Open Qual. 2022;11(2). 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001865
[31]
Eldh AC, Sverker A, Bendtsen P, Nilsson E. Health Care professionals’ experience of a Digital Tool for Patient Exchange, Anamnesis, and Triage in Primary Care: qualitative study. JMIR Hum Factors. 2020;7(4):e21698. 10.2196/21698
[32]
Alhashmi S, Alshurideh M, Al Kurdi B, Salloum S. A systematic review of the factors affecting the Artificial Intelligence Implementation in the Health Care Sector. 2020. p. 37–49. 10.1007/978-3-030-44289-7_4
[33]
Brantnell A, Temiz S, Baraldi E, Woodford J, von Essen L. Barriers to and facilitators of the Implementation of Digital Mental Health Interventions as perceived by primary care decision makers: Content Analysis of Structured Open-Ended Survey Data. JMIR Hum Factors. 2023;10:e44688. 10.2196/44688
[34]
Carlfjord S, Lindberg M, Bendtsen P, Nilsen P, Andersson A. Key factors influencing adoption of an innovation in primary health care: a qualitative study based on implementation theory. BMC Fam Pract. 2010;11:60. 10.1186/1471-2296-11-60
[35]
Reichenpfader U, Carlfjord S, Nilsen P. Leadership in evidence-based practice: a systematic review. Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl). 2015;28(4):298–316. 10.1108/lhs-08-2014-0061
[36]
Nilsen P, Bernhardsson S. Context matters in implementation science: a scoping review of determinant frameworks that describe contextual determinants for implementation outcomes. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):189. 10.1186/s12913-019-4015-3
[37]
Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organizations: Systematic Review and Recommendations

TRISHA GREENHALGH, Glenn Robert, FRASER MACFARLANE et al.

The Milbank Quarterly 2004 10.1111/j.0887-378x.2004.00325.x
[38]
Birken SA, Lee SY, Weiner BJ. Uncovering middle managers’ role in healthcare innovation implementation. Implement Sci. 2012;7:28. 10.1186/1748-5908-7-28
[39]
Challenges to implementing artificial intelligence in healthcare: a qualitative interview study with healthcare leaders in Sweden

Lena Petersson, Ingrid Larsson, Jens M. Nygren et al.

BMC Health Services Research 2022 10.1186/s12913-022-08215-8
[40]
Neher M, Petersson L, Nygren JM, Svedberg P, Larsson I, Nilsen P. Innovation in healthcare: leadership perceptions about the innovation characteristics of artificial intelligence-a qualitative interview study with healthcare leaders in Sweden. Implement Sci Commun. 2023;4(1):81. 10.1186/s43058-023-00458-8
[41]
Abimbola S, Patel B, Peiris D, Patel A, Harris M, Usherwood T, et al. The NASSS framework for ex post theorisation of technology-supported change in healthcare: worked example of the TORPEDO programme. BMC Med. 2019;17(1):233. 10.1186/s12916-019-1463-x
[42]
Blom M, Alvesson M. All-inclusive and all good: the hegemonic ambiguity of leadership. Scand J Manag. 2015;31(4):480–92. 10.1016/j.scaman.2015.08.001
[43]
Alvesson M, Jonsson A. The bumpy road to exercising leadership: fragmentations in meaning and practice. Leadership. 2018;14(1):40–57. 10.1177/1742715016644671
[44]
Vaara E, Whittington R. Strategy-as-Practice: taking Social practices seriously. Acad Manage Annals. 2012;6(1):285–336. 10.5465/19416520.2012.672039
[45]
Macrae C. Learning from the failure of Autonomous and Intelligent systems: accidents, Safety, and Sociotechnical sources of risk. Risk Anal. 2022;42(9):1999–2025. 10.1111/risa.13850
[46]
Mintzberg H, Waters JA. Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strateg Manag J. 1985;6(3):257–72. 10.1002/smj.4250060306
[47]
Naldemirci Ö, Wolf A, Elam M, Lydahl D, Moore L, Britten N. Deliberate and emergent strategies for implementing person-centred care: a qualitative interview study with researchers, professionals and patients. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):527. 10.1186/s12913-017-2470-2
[48]
Strategic planning in a turbulent environment: evidence from the oil majors

Robert M. Grant

Strategic Management Journal 2003 10.1002/smj.314
[49]
Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research: generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2021.
[50]
Using thematic analysis in psychology

Virginia Braun, Victoria Clarke

Qualitative Research in Psychology 2006 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Showing 50 of 77 references

Metrics
21
Citations
77
References
Details
Published
Jul 24, 2024
Vol/Issue
25(1)
License
View
Funding
Halmstad University
Cite This Article
Elin Siira, Daniel Tyskbo, Jens Nygren (2024). Healthcare leaders’ experiences of implementing artificial intelligence for medical history-taking and triage in Swedish primary care: an interview study. BMC Primary Care, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-024-02516-z