journal article Nov 12, 2018

Short-term upper-limb immobilization alters peripersonal space representation

View at Publisher Save 10.1007/s00426-018-1118-0
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
46
[1]
Avanzino, L., Bassolino, M., Pozzo, T., & Bove, M. (2011). Use-dependent hemispheric balance. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 3423–3428. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4893-10.2011 . 10.1523/jneurosci.4893-10.2011
[2]
Bartolo, A., Carlier, M., Hassaini, S., Martin, Y., & Coello, Y. (2014). The perception of peripersonal space in right and left brain damage hemiplegic patients. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00003 . 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00003
[3]
Bartolo, A., Rossetti, Y., Revol, P., Urquizar, C., Pisella, L., & Coello, Y. (2018). Reachability judgement in optic ataxia: Effect of peripheral vision on hand and target perception in depth. Cortex, 98, 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2017.05.013 . 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.05.013
[4]
Bassolino, M., Bove, M., Jacono, M., Fadiga, L., & Pozzo, T. (2012). Functional effect of short-term immobilization: Kinematic changes and recovery on reaching-to-grasp. Neuroscience, 215, 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.04.019 . 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.04.019
[5]
Bassolino, M., Finisguerra, A., Canzoneri, E., Serino, A., & Pozzo, T. (2015). Dissociating effect of upper limb non-use and overuse on space and body representations. Neuropsychologia, 20, 385–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia/2014.11.028 . 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia/2014.11.028
[6]
Bourgeois, J., & Coello, Y. (2012). Effect of visuomotor calibration and uncertainty on the perception of peripersonal space. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 74(6), 1268–1283. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-012-0316-x . 10.3758/s13414-012-0316-x
[7]
Bourgeois, J., Farné, A., & Coello, Y. (2014). Costs and benefits of tool-use on the perception of reachable space. Acta Psychologica, 148, 91–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.01.008 . 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.01.008
[8]
Brouillet, T., Heurley, L., Martin, S., & Brouillet, D. (2010). The embodied cognition theory and the motor component of “yes” and “no” verbal responses. Acta Psychologica, 134, 310–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.03.003 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.03.003
[9]
Canzoneri, E., Ubaldi, S., Rastelli, V., Finisquerra, A., Bassolino, M., & Serino, A. (2013). Tool-use reshapes the boundaries of body and peripersonal space representations. Experimental Brain Research, 228(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3532-2 . 10.1007/s00221-013-3532-2
[10]
Cardinali, L., Brozzoli, C., Urquizar, C., Salemme, R., Roy, A. C., & Farnè, A. (2011). When action is not enough: tool-use reveals tactile-dependent access to body schema. Neuropsychologia, 49, 3750–3757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.033 . 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.033
[11]
Cardinali, L., Jacobs, S., Brozzoli, C., Frassinetti, F., Roy, A. C., & Farnè, A. (2012). Grab an object with a tool and change your body: tool-use-dependent changes of body representation for action. Experimental Brain Research, 218, 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3028-5 . 10.1007/s00221-012-3028-5
[12]
Christamn, S. D., & Niebauer, C. L. (1997). The relation between left-right and upper-lower visual field differences. In S. Christman (Ed.), Cerebral asymmetries in sensory and perceptual processing (pp. 263–298). Amsterdam: Elsevier. 10.1016/s0166-4115(97)80076-3
[13]
Cléry, J., Guipponi, O., Wardak, C., Hamed, B., S (2015). Neuronal bases of peripersonal and extrapersonal spaces, their plasticity and their dynamics: knowns and unknowns. Neuropsychologia, 70, 313–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.10.022 . 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.10.022
[14]
Coello, Y. (2018). Action space representation in social contexts. In Shigemasu, K., Kuwano, S., Sato, T., Matsuzawa, T. (Eds.), Diversity in harmony—insights from psychology. Proceedings of the 31st international congress of psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119362081.ch12 . 10.1002/9781119362081.ch12
[15]
Coello, Y., Bartolo, A., Amiri, B., Houdayer, E., & Derambure, P. (2008). Perceiving what is reachable depends on motor representations: A study using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Plos One, 3(8), e2862. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002862 . 10.1371/journal.pone.0002862
[16]
Coello, Y., Bonnotte, I. (2013). The mutual roles of action representations and spatial deictics in French language. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(11), 2187–2203. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.775596 . 10.1080/17470218.2013.775596
[17]
Coello, Y., Bourgeois, J., & Iachini, T. (2012). Embodied perception of reachable space: how do we manage threatening objects ? Cognitive Processing, 13, S131–S135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-012-0470z . 10.1007/s10339-012-0470z
[18]
Coello, Y., & Iachini, T. (2016). Embodied perception of objects and people in space: towards a unified thoretical framework. In Y. Coelle & M. Fischer (Eds.), Foundations of embodied cognition (pp. 198–219). New York: Psychology Press.
[19]
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Ziegler, J., & Langdon, R. (2001). DRC: A Dual Route Cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204–256. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.204 . 10.1037/0033-295x.108.1.204
[20]
Costantini, M., Ambrosini, E., Tieri, G., Sinigaglia, C., & Committeri, G. (2010). Where does an object trigger an action? An investigation about affordances in space. Experimental Brain Research, 207(1–2), 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2435-8 . 10.1007/s00221-010-2435-8
[21]
Curcio, C. A., & Allen, K. A. (1990). Topography and ganglion cells in the human retina. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 300, 5–25. 10.1002/cne.903000103
[22]
Superior performance for visually guided pointing in the lower visual field

Melvyn A. Goodale, James Danckert

Experimental Brain Research 2001 10.1007/s002210000653
[23]
De Vignemont, F., & Iannetti, G. D. (2015). How many peripersonal spaces? Neuropsychologia, 70, 327–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.11.018 . 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.11.018
[24]
Di Pellegrino, G., & Làdavas, E. (2015). Peripersonal space in the brain. Neuropsychologia, 66, 126–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.11.011 . 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.11.011
[25]
Facchini, S., Romani, M., Tinazzi, M., & Aglioti, S. M. (2002). Time-related changes of excitability of the human motor system contingent upon immobilization of the ring and little fingers. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113, 367–375. 10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00009-3
[26]
Grade, S., Pesenti, M., & Edwards, M. G. (2015). Evidence for the embodiment of space perception: concurrent hand but not arm action moderates reachability and egocentric distance perception. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 862. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00862 . 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00862
[27]
Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple readout model. Psychological Review, 103, 518–565. 10.1037/0033-295x.103.3.518
[28]
Graziano, M. S., & Gandhi, S. (2000). Location of the polysensory zone in the precentral gyrus of anesthetized monkeys. Experimental Brain Research, 135(2), 259–266. 10.1007/s002210000518
[29]
Graziano, M. S., & Cooke, D. F. (2006). Parieto-frontal interactions, personal space, and defensive behavior. Neuropsychologia, 44(13), 2621–2635. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.09.011
[30]
Handy, T. C., Grafton, S. T., Shroff, N. M., Ketay, S., & Gazzaniga, M. S. (2003). Graspable objects grab attention when the potential for action is recognized. Nature Neurosciences, 6, 421–427. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1031 . 10.1038/nn1031
[31]
Huber, R., Ghilardi, M. F., Massimini, M., Ferrarelli, F., Riedner, B. A., Peterson, M. J., & Tononi, G. (2006). Arm immobilization causes cortical plastic changes and locally decreases sleep slow wave activity. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 1169–1176. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1758 . 10.1038/nn1758
[32]
Hunley, S. B., & Lourenco, S. F. (2018). What is peripersonal space? An examination of unresolved empirical issues and emerging findings. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews (Cognitive Science), e1472. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1472.
[33]
Lakha, L., & Humphreys, G. (2005). Lower visual field advantage for motion segmentation during high competition for selection. Spatial Vision, 18, 447–460. 10.1163/1568568054389570
[34]
Meugnot, A., Almecija, Y., & Toussaint, L. (2014). The embodied nature of motor imagery processes highlighted by short-term limb immobilization. Experimental Psychology, 61, 180–186. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000237 . 10.1027/1618-3169/a000237
[35]
Meugnot, A., & Toussaint, L. (2015). Functional plasticity of sensorimotor representations following dominant versus non-dominant hand short-term immobilization. Acta Psychologica, 155, 51–56. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.11.013
[36]
Moisello, C., Bove, M., Huber, R., Abbruzzese, G., Battaglia, F., Tononi, G., & Ghilardi, M. F. (2008). Short-term limb immobilization affects motor performance. Journal of Motor Behavior, 40, 165–176. https://doi.org/10.3200/JMBR.40.2.165-176 . 10.3200/jmbr.40.2.165-176
[37]
Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113. 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
[38]
Olejnik, S., & Algina, J. (2003). Generalized eta and omega squared statistics: measures of effect size for some common research designs, 8(4), 434–447. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.8.4.434 . 10.1037/1082-989x.8.4.434
[39]
Patané, I., Farnè, A., & Frassinetti, F. (2017). Cooperative tool-use reveals peripersonal and interpersonal spaces are dissociable. Cognition, 166, 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.04.013 . 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.04.013
[40]
Previc, F. H. (1998). The neuropsychology of 3-D space. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 123–164. 10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.123
[41]
Afferent properties of periarcuate neurons in macaque monkeys. II. Visual responses

Giacomo Rizzolatti, Cristiana Scandolara, Massimo Matelli et al.

Behavioural Brain Research 1981 10.1016/0166-4328(81)90053-x
[42]
Ruggiero, G., Frassinetti, F., Coello, Y., Rapuano, M., di Cola, A. S., & Iachini, T. (2017). The effect of facial expressions on peripersonal and interpersonal spaces. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 81(6), 1232–1240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0806-x . 10.1007/s00426-016-0806-x
[43]
Shirley, P., & Morley, K. (2008). Realistic Ray Tracing. Natick: A.K. Peters. 10.1201/9781439864449
[44]
Toussaint, L., & Meugnot, A. (2013). Short-term limb immobilization affects cognitive motor processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 39, 623–632. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028942 . 10.1037/a0028942
[45]
Valdés-Conroy, B., Román, F. J., Hinojosa, J. A., & Shorkey, S. P. (2012). So far so good: emotion in the peripersonal/extrapersonal space. PLoS One, 7(11), e49162. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049162 . 10.1371/journal.pone.0049162
[46]
Wamain, Y., Gabrielli, F., & Coello, Y. (2016). EEG µ rhythm in virtual reality reveals that motor coding of visual objects in peripersonal space is task dependent. Cortex, 74, 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.10.006 . 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.10.006
Cited By
17
Quarterly Journal of Experimental P...
Psychological Research
Metrics
17
Citations
46
References
Details
Published
Nov 12, 2018
Vol/Issue
84(4)
Pages
907-914
License
View
Cite This Article
Lucette Toussaint, Yannick Wamain, Christel Bidet-Ildei, et al. (2018). Short-term upper-limb immobilization alters peripersonal space representation. Psychological Research, 84(4), 907-914. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1118-0
Related

You May Also Like