Teaching methods and their impact on students’ emotions in mathematics: an experience-sampling approach

Madeleine Bieg; Thomas Goetz; Fabio Sticca; Esther Brunner; Eva Becker; Vinzenz Morger; Kyle Hubbard

doi:10.1007/s11858-017-0840-1

journal article Feb 24, 2017

Teaching methods and their impact on students’ emotions in mathematics: an experience-sampling approach

Madeleine Bieg Thomas Goetz

Fabio Sticca

Esther Brunner Eva Becker Vinzenz Morger Kyle Hubbard

ZDM – Mathematics Education Vol. 49 No. 3 pp. 411-422 · Springer Science and Business Media LLC

View at Publisher Save 10.1007/s11858-017-0840-1

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

59

[1]

Abdu, R., Schwarz, B., & Mavrikis, M. (2015). Whole-class scaffolding for learning to solve mathematics problems together in a computer-supported environment. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47, 1163–1178. 10.1007/s11858-015-0719-y

[2]

Ahmed, W., van der Werf, G., Minnaert, A., & Kuyper, H. (2010). Students’ daily emotions in the classroom: Intra-individual variability and appraisal correlates. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 583–597. 10.1348/000709910x498544

[3]

Bakker, A., Smit, J., & Wegerif, R. (2015). Scaffolding and dialogic teaching in mathematics education: Introduction and review. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47, 1047. doi: 10.1007/s11858-015-0738-8 . 10.1007/s11858-015-0738-8

[4]

Bieg, M., Goetz, T., & Hubbard, K. (2013). Can I master it and does it matter? An intraindividual analysis on control–value antecedents of trait and state academic emotions. Learning and Individual Differences, 28, 102–108. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2013.09.006 . 10.1016/j.lindif.2013.09.006

[5]

Bieg, M., Goetz, T., Wolter, I., & Hall, N. C. (2015). Gender stereotype endorsement differentially predicts girls’ and boys’ trait-state discrepancy in math anxiety. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1404. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01404 . 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01404

[6]

Bohl, T., Bönsch, M., Trautmann, M., & Wischer, B. (Eds.). (2012). Binnendifferenzierung. Teil 1: Didaktische Grundlagen und Forschungsergebnisse zur Binnendifferenzierung im Unterricht [Internal differentiation. Didactical basics and research results for internal differentiation in class]. Immenhausen bei Kassel: Prolog-Verlag.

[7]

Brunner, E. (2013). Innermathematisches Beweisen und Argumentieren in der Sekundarstufe I [Mathematical proving and argumentation at secondary I level]. Münster: Waxmann.

[8]

Brunner, Esther (2014). Verschiedene Beweistypen und ihre Umsetzung im Unterrichtsgespräch. Journal für Mathematik Didaktik, 35(2), 229–249. 10.1007/s13138-014-0065-6

[9]

Buff, A., Reusser, K., Rakoczy, K., & Pauli, C. (2011). Activating positive affective experiences in the classroom: ‘Nice to have’ or something more? Learning and Instruction, 21(3), 452–466. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.07.008 . 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.07.008

[10]

Bundesamt für Statistik Schweiz (Swiss Federal Statistical Office). (2016). http://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/portal/de/index/themen/15/06/dos/blank/05/01.html . Accessed 24 Apr 2016.

[11]

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). The flow experience and its significance for human psychology. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. S. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness (pp. 15–35). New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/cbo9780511621956.002

[12]

Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (1987). Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 175(9), 526–536. doi: 10.1097/00005053-198709000-00004 . 10.1097/00005053-198709000-00004

[13]

D’Ailly, H. H. (1992a). Asian mathematics superiority: A search for explanations. Educational Psychologist, 27(2), 243–261. 10.1207/s15326985ep2702_7

[14]

D’Ailly, H. H. (1992b). Asian mathematics superiority: A search for explanations: Errata. Educational Psychologist, 27(3), 405–405.

[15]

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). The paradox of achievement: The harder you push, the worse it gets. In J. Aronson (Ed.), Improving academic achievement: Impact of psychological factors on education (pp. 61–87). New York: Academic Press. 10.1016/b978-012064455-1/50007-5

[16]

Eccles, J. S. (1983). Expectanices, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives: Psychological and sociological approaches (pp. 75–146). San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Compancy.

[17]

Gersten, R., Chard, D. J., Jayanthi, M., Baker, S. K., Morphy, O., & Flojo, J. (2009). Mathematics instruction for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of instructional components. Review of Educational Research, 79, 1202–1242. 10.3102/0034654309334431

[18]

Givvin, K. B., Hiebert, J., Jacobs, J. K., Hollingsworth, H., & Gallimore, R. (2005). Are there national patterns of teaching? Evidence from the TIMSS 1999 video study. Comparative Education Review, 49(3), 311. 10.1086/430260

[19]

Gläser-Zikuda, M., Fuß, S., Laukenmann, M., Metz, K., & Randler, C. (2005). Promoting students’ emotions and achievement- Instructional design and evaluation of the ECOLE approach. Learning and Instruction, 15, 481–495. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.013

[20]

Do Girls Really Experience More Anxiety in Mathematics?

Thomas Goetz, Madeleine Bieg, Oliver Lüdtke et al.

Psychological Science 2013 10.1177/0956797613486989

[21]

Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Stoeger, H., & Hall, N. C. (2010). Antecedents of everyday positive emotions: An experience sampling analysis. Motivation and Emotion, 34(1), 49–62. doi: 10.1007/s11031-009-9152-2 . 10.1007/s11031-009-9152-2

[22]

Goetz, T., & Hall, N. C. (2013). Emotion and achievement in the classroom. In J. Hattie & E. M. Anderman (Eds.), International guide to student achievement (pp. 192–195). New York: Routledge.

[23]

Goetz, T., Lohrmann, K., Ganser, B., & Haag, L. (2005). Einsatz von Unterrichtsmethoden—Konstanz oder Wandel? Empirische Pädagogik, 19(4), 342–360.

[24]

Goetz, T., Lüdtke, O., Nett, U. E., Keller, M. M., & Lipnevich, A. A. (2013). Characteristics of teaching and students’ emotions in the classroom: Investigating differences across domains. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(4), 383–394. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.08.001 . 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.08.001

[25]

Hayes, A. F., & Preacher, K. J. (2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67(3), 451–470. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12028 . 10.1111/bmsp.12028

[26]

Hektner, J. M., Schmidt, J. A., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2007). Experience sampling method: Measuring the quality of everyday life. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. 10.4135/9781412984201

[27]

Helmke, A. (2012). Unterrichtsqualität und Lehrerprofessionalität: Diagnose, Evaluation und Verbesserung des Unterrichts [Teaching quality and teacher professionalism: Diagnosis, evaluation, and improvement of teaching] (4. überarb. Aufl.). Seelze: Klett-Kallmeyer.

[28]

Hidi, S. (2000). An interest researcher’s perspective: The effects of extrinsic and intrinsic factors on motivation. In C. Sansone & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 309–339). San Diego: Academic Press. 10.1016/b978-012619070-0/50033-7

[29]

Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., Garnier, H., Givvin, K. B., Hollingsworth, H., Jacobs, J., et al. (2003). Teaching mathematics in seven countries: Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study. NCES (2003–2013). Washington DC: US Department of Education/National Center for Education Statistics.

[30]

Hugener, I., Pauli, C., Reusser, K., Lipowsky, F., Rakoczy, K., & Klieme, E. (2009). Teaching patterns and learning quality in Swiss and German mathematics lessons. Learning and Instruction, 19(1), 66–78. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.02.001 . 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.02.001

[31]

Jacobs, J. K., Hiebert, J., Givvin, K. B., Hollingsworth, H., Garnier, H., & Wearne, D. (2006). Does eighth-grade mathematics teaching in the US align with the NCTM standards? Results from the TIMSS 1995 and 1999 video studies. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(1), 5–32.

[32]

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

[33]

Kampshoff, M. (2009). Heterogenität im Blick der Schul- und Unterrichtsforschung [Heterogeneity in research on school and teaching]. In Budde, J. & Willems, K., Bildung als sozialer Prozess—zwischen Ungleichheit und Entwicklungsperspektiven [Education as a social process—between inequality and developmental perspectives] (pp. 35–52). Weinheim und München: Juventa Verlag.

[34]

Kubiak, T., & Krog, K. (2012). Computerized sampling of experiences and behavior. In M. R. Mehl & T. Conner Christensen (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life. New York: Guilford Press.

[35]

Kunter, M., & Baumert, J. (2006). Who is the expert? Construct and criteria validity of student and teacher ratings of instruction. Learning Environments Research, 9(3), 231–251. 10.1007/s10984-006-9015-7

[36]

Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaption. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[37]

Lipowsky, F. (2006). Auf den Lehrer kommt es an. Empirische Evidenzen für Zusammenhänge zwischen Lehrerkompetenzen, Lehrerhandeln und dem Lernen der Schüler. In C. Allemann-Ghionda & E Terhart (Eds.), Kompetenz und Kompetenzentwicklung von Lehrerinnen und Lehrern. Beiheft der Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 51, S. 47–S. 70.

[38]

Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2013). Mplus user’s guide. Seventh Edition. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.

[39]

Patall, E. A., Dent, A. L., Oyer, M., & Wynn, S. R. (2013). Student autonomy and course value: The unique and cumulative roles of various teacher practices. Motivation and Emotion, 37(1), 14–32. doi: 10.1007/s11031-012-9305-6 . 10.1007/s11031-012-9305-6

[40]

Pauli, C., & Reusser, K. (2003). Unterrichtsskripts im schweizerischen und im deutschen Mathematikunterricht [Teaching scripts in Swiss and German mathematics teaching]. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 31(3), 238–272.

[41]

Pauli, C., & Reusser, K. (2010). Selbst- und Unterrichtswahrnehmung der Lehrperson [Teachers’ self- and teaching perception]. In K. Reusser, C. Pauli & M. Waldis (Eds.), Unterrichtsgestaltung und Unterrichtsqualität [Teaching and teaching quality] (pp. 143–170). Münster: Waxmann.

[42]

Pekrun, R. (2000). A social-cognitive, control–value theory of achievement emotions. In J. Heckhausen (Ed.), Motivational psychology of human development: Developing motivation and motivating development (pp. 143–163). New York: Elsevier Science. 10.1016/s0166-4115(00)80010-2

[43]

The Control-Value Theory of Achievement Emotions: Assumptions, Corollaries, and Implications for Educational Research and Practice

Reinhard Pekrun

Educational Psychology Review 2006 10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9

[44]

Pekrun, R., Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., & Perry, R. P. (2007). The control–value theory of achievement emotions: An integrative approach to emotions in education. In P. A. Schutz & R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotion in education (pp. 13–36). San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press. 10.1016/b978-012372545-5/50003-4

[45]

Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Daniels, L. M., Stupnisky, R. H., & Perry, R. P. (2010). Boredom in achievement settings: Exploring control–value antecedents and performance outcomes of a neglected emotion. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 531–549. doi: 10.1037/a0019243 . 10.1037/a0019243

[46]

Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Barchfeld, P., & Perry, R. P. (2011). Measuring emotions in students’ learning and performance: The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 36–48. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.002 . 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.002

[47]

Rakoczy, K. (2008). Motivationsunterstützung im Mathematikunterricht—Unterricht aus der Perspektive von Lernenden und Beobachtern [Motivational support in math classes—teaching from the perspective of learners and observers]. Münster: Waxmann.

[48]

Reusser, K., & Pauli, C. (2015). Co-constructivism in educational theory and practice. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (Vol. 3, pp. 913–917). Oxford: Elsevier. 10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.92026-9

[49]

Robinson, M. D., & Clore, G. L. (2002). Belief and feeling: Evidence for an accessibility model of emotional self-report. Psychological Bulletin, 128(6), 934–960. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.128.6.934 . 10.1037/0033-2909.128.6.934

[50]

Roseman, I. J., Spindel, M. S., & Jose, P. E. (1990). Appraisals of emotion-eliciting events: Testing a theory of discrete emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(5), 899–915. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.899 . 10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.899

Showing 50 of 59 references

Cited By

47

Associations of Empathy with Teacher–Student Interactions: A Potential Ternary Model

Binghai Sun, Yaoyao Wang · 2023

Brain Sciences

A cross-classified path analysis of the self-determination theory model on the situational, individual and classroom levels in college education

Shi Yu, Chantal Levesque-Bristol · 2020

Contemporary Educational Psychology

Metrics

47

Citations

59

References

Details

Published: Feb 24, 2017
Vol/Issue: 49(3)
Pages: 411-422
License: View

Authors

M

Madeleine Bieg

Department of Empirical Educational Research, University of Konstanz; Thurgau University of Teacher Education

T

Thomas Goetz

Department of Empirical Educational Research, University of Konstanz; Thurgau University of Teacher Education

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung Award: 100014_131713/1

Cite This Article

Madeleine Bieg, Thomas Goetz, Fabio Sticca, et al. (2017). Teaching methods and their impact on students’ emotions in mathematics: an experience-sampling approach. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 49(3), 411-422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0840-1

Teaching methods and their impact on students’ emotions in mathematics: an experience-sampling approach

You May Also Like