Behind the definition of Industry 5.0: a systematic review of technologies, principles, components, and values

Breque M, De Nul L, Petridis A (2021). Industry 5.0, R&I Paper Series, European Commission, Retrieved fromhttps://op.europa.eu/flexpaper/common/view.jsp?doc=468a892a-5097-11eb-b59f-01aa75ed71a1.en.PDF.pdf&user=&format=pdf&page=[*,0].

[5]

10.3390/su14031391

[6]

Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0—Inception, conception and perception

Xun Xu, Yuqian Lu, Birgit Vogel-Heuser et al.

Journal of Manufacturing Systems 10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.10.006

[7]

Digital transformation success under Industry 4.0: a strategic guideline for manufacturing SMEs

Morteza Ghobakhloo, Mohammad Iranmanesh

Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 10.1108/jmtm-11-2020-0455

[8]

10.1080/21681015.2021.1965665

[9]

10.1080/21681015.2022.2116495

[10]

10.1080/21681015.2021.1937725

[11]

10.1109/tii.2020.3003910

[12]

10.3390/app12042053

[13]

Outlook on human-centric manufacturing towards Industry 5.0

Yuqian Lu, Hao Zheng, Saahil Chand et al.

Journal of Manufacturing Systems 10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.02.001

[14]

10.1109/tem.2022.3143466

[15]

10.1109/jiot.2020.3047613

[16]

10.1109/tii.2021.3120511

[17]

Broo DG J Ind Inf Integr (2022)

[18]

10.1007/978-3-030-94335-6_37

[19]

10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108770

[20]

A safety management approach for Industry 5.0′s human-centered manufacturing based on digital twin

Haoqi Wang, Lindong Lv, Xupeng Li et al.

Journal of Manufacturing Systems 10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.11.013

[21]

10.1080/12460125.2020.1798591

[22]

10.1007/s13132-021-00854-2

[23]

Müller J (2020). Enabling technologies for Industry 5.0, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, European Commission. Retrived from https://op.europa.eu/o/opportal-service/download-handler?identifier=8e5de100-2a1c-11eb-9d7e-01aa75ed71a1&format=pdf&language=en&productionSystem=cellar&part=

[24]

Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: challenges and benefits

Quenby Mahood, Dwayne Van Eerd, Emma Irvin

Research Synthesis Methods 10.1002/jrsm.1106

[25]

Sustainable industrial and operation engineering trends and challenges Toward Industry 4.0: a data driven analysis

Ming-Lang Tseng, Thi Phuong Thuy Tran, Hien Minh Ha et al.

Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering 10.1080/21681015.2021.1950227

[26]

Implementing Industry 4.0 principles

Héctor Cañas, Josefa Mula, Manuel Díaz-Madroñero et al.

Computers & Industrial Engineering 10.1016/j.cie.2021.107379

[27]

10.1016/j.compind.2020.103261

[28]

10.1016/j.cie.2021.107824

[29]

10.4324/9781315517971

[30]

Disruptive Technologies and Operations Management in the Industry 4.0 Era and Beyond

Tsan‐Ming Choi, Subodha Kumar, Xiaohang Yue et al.

Production and Operations Management 10.1111/poms.13622

[31]

10.1002/9781119711308.ch6

[32]

Wiedermann J, van Leeuwen J (2021). Towards Minimally Conscious Cyber-Physical Systems: a Manifesto. Paper presented at the SOFSEM 2021: Theory and Practice of Computer Science, Cham. 10.1007/978-3-030-67731-2_4

[33]

10.1007/978-981-19-2012-7_12

[34]

10.1109/sysose.2019.8753835

[35]

10.1364/jocn.438522

[36]

10.1142/s270507852050006x

[37]

10.1109/tii.2022.3141403

[38]

Industry 5.0: A survey on enabling technologies and potential applications

Praveen Kumar Reddy Maddikunta, Quoc-Viet Pham, Prabadevi B et al.

Journal of Industrial Information Integration 10.1016/j.jii.2021.100257

[39]

10.3390/s20082346

[40]

10.3390/su11164371

[41]

10.1109/access.2021.3056752

[42]

10.3390/app10124182

[43]

10.1109/itqmis.2019.8928305

[44]

10.1109/comst.2021.3061981

[45]

10.1016/j.engappai.2020.103529

[46]

Lightweight Mutual Authentication and Privacy-Preservation Scheme for Intelligent Wearable Devices in Industrial-CPS

Mian Ahmad Jan, Fazlullah Khan, Rahim Khan et al.

IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 10.1109/tii.2020.3043802

[47]

10.1007/s00170-019-04638-6

[48]

10.1007/s12369-020-00629-w

[49]

10.1080/01691864.2021.1928552

[50]

Evaluating quality in human-robot interaction: A systematic search and classification of performance and human-centered factors, measures and metrics towards an industry 5.0

Enrique Coronado, Takuya Kiyokawa, Gustavo A. Garcia Ricardez et al.

Journal of Manufacturing Systems 10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.04.007

Showing 50 of 100 references

Cited By

185

How can we improve AI competencies for tomorrow's leaders: Insights from multi-stakeholders’ interaction

Shashank Gupta, Rachana Jaiswal · 2024

The International Journal of Manage...

Metrics

185

Citations

100

References

Details

Published: May 27, 2023
Vol/Issue: 40(6)
Pages: 432-447
License: View

Authors

M

Morteza Ghobakhloo

School of Economics and Business, Kaunas University of Technology, Kaunas, Lithuania; Division of Industrial Engineering and Management, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

M

Mohammad Iranmanesh

School of Business and Law, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia

M

Ming-Lang Tseng

Institute of Innovation and Circular Economy, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan

A

Andrius Grybauskas

School of Economics and Business, Kaunas University of Technology, Kaunas, Lithuania

A

Alessandro Stefanini

Department of Energy, Systems, Land and Construction Engineering, University of Pisa, Pisa, PI, Italy

A

Azlan Amran

Graduate School of Business, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia

Funding

European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme Award: No 810318

Cite This Article

Morteza Ghobakhloo, Mohammad Iranmanesh, Ming-Lang Tseng, et al. (2023). Behind the definition of Industry 5.0: a systematic review of technologies, principles, components, and values. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 40(6), 432-447. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2023.2216701

Behind the definition of Industry 5.0: a systematic review of technologies, principles, components, and values

You May Also Like