journal article Open Access Nov 08, 2022

Recent cover crop adoption is associated with small maize and soybean yield losses in the United States

Global Change Biology Vol. 29 No. 3 pp. 794-807 · Wiley
View at Publisher Save 10.1111/gcb.16489
Abstract
AbstractCover crops are gaining traction in many agricultural regions, partly driven by increased public subsidies and by private markets for ecosystem services. These payments are motivated by environmental benefits, including improved soil health, reduced erosion, and increased soil organic carbon. However, previous work based on experimental plots or crop modeling indicates cover crops may reduce crop yields. It remains unclear, though, how recent cover crop adoption has affected productivity in commercial agricultural systems. Here we perform the first large‐scale, field‐level analysis of observed yield impacts from cover cropping as implemented across the US Corn Belt. We use validated satellite data products at sub‐field scales to analyze maize and soybean yield outcomes for over 90,000 fields in 2019–2020. Because we lack data on cover crop species or timing, we seek to quantify the yield impacts of cover cropping as currently practiced in aggregate. Using causal forests analysis, we estimate an average maize yield loss of 5.5% on fields where cover crops were used for 3 or more years, compared with fields that did not adopt cover cropping. Maize yield losses were larger on fields with better soil ratings, cooler mid‐season temperatures, and lower spring rainfall. For soybeans, average yield losses were 3.5%, with larger impacts on fields with warmer June temperatures, lower spring and late‐season rainfall, and, to a lesser extent, better soils. Estimated impacts are consistent with multiple mechanisms indicated by experimental and simulation‐based studies, including the effects of cover crops on nitrogen dynamics, water consumption, and soil oxygen depletion. Our results suggest a need to improve cover crop management to reduce yield penalties, and a potential need to target subsidies based on likely yield impacts. Ultimately, avoiding substantial yield penalties is important for realizing widespread adoption and associated benefits for water quality, erosion, soil carbon, and greenhouse gas emissions.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
55
[3]
A critical review of the impacts of cover crops on nitrogen leaching, net greenhouse gas balance and crop productivity

Mohamed Abdalla, Astley Hastings, Kun Cheng et al.

Global Change Biology 10.1111/gcb.14644
[5]
Recursive partitioning for heterogeneous causal effects

Susan Athey, Guido Imbens

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 10.1073/pnas.1510489113
[6]
The State of Applied Econometrics: Causality and Policy Evaluation

Susan Athey, Guido W. Imbens

Journal of Economic Perspectives 10.1257/jep.31.2.3
[8]
Baiardi A. &Naghi A.(2020).The value added of machine learning to causal inference: Evidence from revisited studies. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper 2021‐001/V.https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3759867 10.2139/ssrn.3759867
[14]
Random Forests

Leo Breiman

Machine Learning 10.1023/a:1010933404324
[23]
Farbmacher H. Kogel H. &Spindler M.(2019).Heterogeneous effects of poverty on cognition.http://www.farbmacher.de/working_papers/Farbmacher_etal_2019.pdf 10.2139/ssrn.3505970
[24]
Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines

Jerome H. Friedman

The Annals of Statistics 10.1214/aos/1176347963
[36]
Corn yield response to winter cover crops: An updated meta-analysis

G.S. Marcillo, F.E. Miguez

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 10.2489/jswc.72.3.226
[37]
Milborrow S. (2019).earth: Multivariate adapative regression splines.https://cran.r‐project.org/package=earth
[38]
NASS. (2021).Quick stats API.https://quickstats.nass.usda.gov/api
[39]
NRCS (2016)
[42]
R Core Team (2014)
[44]
The trouble with cover crops: Farmers’ experiences with overcoming barriers to adoption

Gabrielle E. Roesch-McNally, Andrea D. Basche, J.G. Arbuckle et al.

Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 10.1017/s1742170517000096
[45]
The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects

Paul R. Rosenbaum, Donald B. Rubin

Biometrika 10.1093/biomet/70.1.41
[48]
Strittmatter A. (2019). What is the value added by using causal machine learning methods in a welfare experiment evaluation?ArXiv.http://arxiv.org/abs/1812.06533v2
[49]
Tibshirani J. Athey S. Wager S. Friedberg R. Miner L. &Wright M.(2018).grf: Generalized random forests (beta).https://cran.r‐project.org/package=grf 10.32614/cran.package.grf
[50]
USGS (2012)

Showing 50 of 55 references

Cited By
136
International Statistical Review /...
Metrics
136
Citations
55
References
Details
Published
Nov 08, 2022
Vol/Issue
29(3)
Pages
794-807
License
View
Authors
Funding
National Institute of Food and Agriculture Award: AG 2018‐68002‐27961
Cite This Article
Jillian M. Deines, Kaiyu Guan, Bruno Lopez, et al. (2022). Recent cover crop adoption is associated with small maize and soybean yield losses in the United States. Global Change Biology, 29(3), 794-807. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16489