journal article Apr 01, 2015

Effectively managing angler satisfaction in recreational fisheries requires understanding the fish species and the anglers

View at Publisher Save 10.1139/cjfas-2014-0177
Abstract
Whenever satisfied anglers are an important objective of recreational fisheries management, understanding how trip outcomes influence satisfaction reports is critical. While anglers, generally, prefer high catch rates and large fish, the relative importance of these catch outcomes for catch satisfaction has not been established across species and angler types. We examined relationships between angler specialization, trip outcomes (both catch and non-catch characteristics such as crowding), and catch satisfaction across six freshwater fish species in northern Germany. As expected, catch satisfaction was primarily determined by catch rate and fish size in all fish species; however, the relative importance of these two outcomes varied considerably across species and among angler types that differed by commitment to fishing. We found a diminishing marginal return of satisfaction for increasing catch rate for all but small-bodied cyprinid species, while increasing size of largest retained fish monotonically increased catch satisfaction in all species we examined. Non-catch outcomes (e.g., the number of other anglers seen while fishing) also had a significant negative influence on catch satisfaction, suggesting that non-catch factors are important in establishing expectations and for contextual evaluation of catch outcomes. We also determined that diversified trips made anglers more satisfied and that all else being equal, specialized anglers increased catch satisfaction from travel and fishing time. The results highlight the importance for managers to consider their particular mix of anglers as well as the fish species present when setting regulations aimed at increasing angler satisfaction.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
70
[8]
Atkinson, J.W. 1969. Change of activity, a new focus for the theory of motivation. In Human action, conceptual and empirical issues. Edited by T. Mischel. Academic Press, New York. pp. 105–133.
[13]
Ben-Akiva, M.E., and Lerman, S.R. 1985. Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to travel demand. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
[16]
Bryan H. J. Leis. Res. (1977) 10.1080/00222216.1977.11970328
[19]
Carson R.T. Mar. Resour. Econ. (2009) 10.1086/mre.24.2.42731375
[22]
Ditton R.B. J. Leis. Res. (1992) 10.1080/00222216.1992.11969870
[23]
Donnelly M.P. J. Leis. Res. (1986) 10.1080/00222216.1986.11969648
[24]
Dorow, M., and Arlinghaus, R. 2011. A telephone-diary-mail approach to survey recreational fisheries on large geographic scales, with a note on annual landings estimates by anglers in northern Germany. In The angler in the environment: social, economic, biological and ethical dimensions. Edited by T.D. Beard, R. Arlinghaus, and S.G. Sutton. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Md. pp. 319–344.
[31]
Rethinking length‐based fisheries regulations: the value of protecting old and large fish with harvest slots

Daniel C Gwinn, Micheal S Allen, Fiona D Johnston et al.

Fish and Fisheries 10.1111/faf.12053
[32]
Hahn, J. 1991. Angler specialization: measurement of a key sociological concept and implications for fisheries management decisions. In Creel and Angler Surveys in Fisheries Management: Proceedings of the International Symposium and Workshop on Creel and Angler Surveys in Fisheries Management, held at Houston, Texas, USA, 26–31 March 1990. Edited by D. Guthrie, J.M. Hoenig, M. Holliday, C.M. Jones, M.J. Mills, S.A. Moberly, K.H. Pollack, and D.R. Talhelm. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Md. pp. 380–389.
[33]
Heberlein T.A. J. Leis. Res. (1977) 10.1080/00222216.1977.11970320
[35]
Hendee, J.C., Stankey, G.H., and Lucas, R.C. 1990. Wilderness management. Fulcrum Publishing, Golden, Colo.
[42]
Diversity and complexity of angler behaviour drive socially optimal input and output regulations in a bioeconomic recreational-fisheries model

Fiona D. Johnston, Robert Arlinghaus, Ulf Dieckmann

Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 10.1139/f10-046
[43]
Kim S.S. J. Leis. Res. (1997) 10.1080/00222216.1997.11949799
[45]
Louviere, J.J., Hensher, D.A., and Swait, J.D. 2000. Stated choice methods: analysis and applications. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/cbo9780511753831
[46]
Manfredo M.J. J. Leis. Res. (1996) 10.1080/00222216.1996.11949770
[47]
Matlock, G.C., Osburn, H.R., Riechers, R.K., and Ditton, R.B. 1991. Comparison of response scales for measuring angler satisfaction. In Creel and Angler Surveys in Fisheries Management: Proceedings of the International Symposium and Workshop on Creel and Angler Surveys in Fisheries Management, held at Houston, Texas, USA, 26–31 March 1990. Edited by D. Guthrie, J.M. Hoenig, M. Holliday, C.M. Jones, M.J. Mills, S.A. Moberly, K.H. Pollack, and D.R. Talhelm. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Md. pp. 413–422.
[50]
Meinelt, T., Jendrusch, K., and Arlinghaus, R. 2008. Competitive fishing in Germany: an overview. In Global Challenges in Recreational Fisheries. Edited by Ø. Aas, R. Arlinghaus, R.B. Ditton, D. Policansky, and H.L. Schramm, Jr. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford, UK. pp. 254–258.

Showing 50 of 70 references

Metrics
157
Citations
70
References
Details
Published
Apr 01, 2015
Vol/Issue
72(4)
Pages
500-513
License
View
Cite This Article
Ben Beardmore, Len M. Hunt, Wolfgang Haider, et al. (2015). Effectively managing angler satisfaction in recreational fisheries requires understanding the fish species and the anglers. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 72(4), 500-513. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2014-0177