journal article Sep 01, 2010

Diversity and complexity of angler behaviour drive socially optimal input and output regulations in a bioeconomic recreational-fisheries model

Abstract
In many areas of the world, recreational fisheries are not managed sustainably. This might be related to the omission or oversimplification of angler behaviour and angler heterogeneity in fisheries-management models. We present an integrated bioeconomic modelling approach to examine how differing assumptions about angler behaviour, angler preferences, and composition of the angler population altered predictions about optimal recreational-fisheries management, where optimal regulations were determined by maximizing aggregated angler utility. We report four main results derived for a prototypical northern pike ( Esox lucius ) fishery. First, accounting for dynamic angler behaviour changed predictions about optimal angling regulations. Second, optimal input and output regulations varied substantially among different angler types. Third, the composition of the angler population in terms of angler types was important for determining optimal regulations. Fourth, the welfare measure used to quantify aggregated utility altered the predicted optimal regulations, highlighting the importance of choosing welfare measures that closely reflect management objectives. A further key finding was that socially optimal angling regulations resulted in biological sustainability of the fish population. Managers can use the novel integrated modelling framework introduced here to account, quantitatively and transparently, for the diversity and complexity of angler behaviour when determining regulations that maximize social welfare and ensure biological sustainability.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
107
[1]
Aas, Ø., and Ditton, R.B. 1998. Human dimensions perspective on recreational fisheries management: implications for Europe. In Recreational fisheries: social, economic and management aspects. Edited by P. Hickley and H. Tompkins. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, U.K. pp. 153–164.
[5]
Allen M.S. Am. Fish. Soc. Symp. (1996)
[6]
An assessment of recreational fishery harvest policies for Murray cod in southeast Australia

M.S. Allen, P. Brown, J. Douglas et al.

Fisheries Research 10.1016/j.fishres.2008.09.028
[11]
Arlinghaus, R., and Cooke, S.J. 2009. Recreational fisheries: socioeconomic importance, conservation issues and management challenges. In Recreational hunting, conservation and rural livelihoods: science and practice. Edited by B. Dickson, J. Hutton, and B. Adams. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, U.K. pp. 39–58.
[25]
Bryan H. J. Leisure Res. (1977) 10.1080/00222216.1977.11970328
[26]
Carpenter S.R. Ecol. Soc. (2004) 10.5751/es-00622-090108
[28]
Coggins L.G. Fish Fish. (2007) 10.1111/j.1467-2679.2007.00247.x
[31]
Cox, S., and Walters, C. 2002a. Maintaining quality in recreational fisheries: how success breeds failure in management of open-access sport fisheries. In Recreational fisheries: ecological, economic and social evaluation. Edited by T.J. Pitcher and C.E. Hollingworth. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, U.K. pp. 107–119.
[37]
Ditton R.B. J. Leisure Res. (1992) 10.1080/00222216.1992.11969870
[39]
Driver B.L. Trans. N. Am. Wildl. Nat. Resour. Conf. (1984)
[43]
Understanding Angler Motivations in Fisheries Management

Anthony J. Fedler, Robert B. Ditton

Fisheries 10.1577/1548-8446(1994)019<0006:uamifm>2.0.co;2
[48]
Goodyear, C.P. 1993. Spawning stock biomass per recruit in fisheries management: foundation and current use. In Risk evaluation and biological reference points for fisheries management. Edited by S.J. Smith, J.J. Hunt, and D. Rivard. Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sci. No. 120. pp. 67–81.
[49]
Hahn J. Am. Fish. Soc. Symp. (1991)
[50]
Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses

W. Michael Hanemann

American Journal of Agricultural Economics 10.2307/1240800

Showing 50 of 107 references

Cited By
175
Metrics
175
Citations
107
References
Details
Published
Sep 01, 2010
Vol/Issue
67(9)
Pages
1507-1531
License
View
Authors
Cite This Article
Fiona D. Johnston, Robert Arlinghaus, Ulf Dieckmann (2010). Diversity and complexity of angler behaviour drive socially optimal input and output regulations in a bioeconomic recreational-fisheries model. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 67(9), 1507-1531. https://doi.org/10.1139/f10-046