journal article Sep 28, 2017

Decolonizing both researcher and research and its effectiveness in Indigenous research

Research Ethics Vol. 14 No. 2 pp. 1-24 · SAGE Publications
View at Publisher Save 10.1177/1747016117733296
Abstract
How does one decolonize and reclaim the meanings of research and researcher, particularly in the context of Western research? Indigenous communities have long experienced oppression by Western researchers. Is it possible to build a collaborative research knowledge that is culturally appropriate, respectful, honoring, and careful of the Indigenous community? What are the challenges in Western research, researchers, and Western university methodology research training? How have ‘studies’ – critical anti-racist theory and practice, cross-cultural research methodology, critical perspectives on environmental justice, and land-based education – been incorporated into the university to disallow dissent? What can be done against this disallowance? According to Eve Tuck and K Wayne Yang’s (2012) suggestion, this article did not use the concept of decolonization as a substitute for ‘human rights’ or ‘social justice’, but as a demand of an Indigenous framework and a centering of Indigenous land, Indigenous sovereignty and Indigenous ways of thinking. This article discusses why both research and researcher increasingly require decolonization so that research can create a positive impact on the participants’ community, and conduct research ethically. This article is my personal decolonization and reclaiming story from 15 years of teaching, research and service activities with various Indigenous communities in various parts of the world. It presents a number of case studies of an intervention research project to exemplify the challenges in Western research training, and how decolonizing research training attempts to not only reclaim participants’ rights in the research but also to empower the researcher. I conclude by arguing that decolonizing research training creates more empathetic educators and researchers, transforming us for participants, and demonstrating how we can take responsibility for our research.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
41
[1]
Ahmed B (2012)
[2]
Battiste M (2000)
[3]
Battiste M (2001)
[5]
Battiste M (2017) Decolonial ways of knowing and doing at Banglar Gann O Katha at CFCR 90.5 Saskatoon Radio Program. Available at: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B68It2SOL0p5U0NRVGpCMlU3SlE/viewhttps://drive.google.com/file/d/0B68It2SOL0p5U0NRVGpCMlU3SlE/view (accessed 13 March 2017).
[8]
Cajete G (1994)
[9]
Caldwell K Journal of Health, Social and Environmental Issues (2005)
[11]
Datta R Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability (2015) 10.1080/13549839.2013.818957
[17]
Dodson M (1994)
[18]
Haraway D (1996)
[19]
Haraway D (2004)
[20]
King T (2003)
[21]
Kovach M (2010)
[22]
Latour B (2004)
[23]
Lavallée L (2009) Practical application of an Indigenous research framework and Indigenous research methods: Sharing circles and Anishnaabe symbol-based reflection. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 8(1): 21–40. Available at: http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/IJQM/article/view/943/5195 (accessed 28 April 2017). 10.1177/160940690900800103
[24]
Lévi-Strauss C (1966)
[26]
Little Bear L (2009)
[27]
Lowan-Trudeau G Canadian Journal of Environmental Education (2012)
[28]
Minnich EK (1990)
[32]
Simpson L Canadian Journal of Native Studies (2001)
[33]
Smith LT (1999)
[34]
Smith LT (2008)
[35]
Smith LT (2009)
[36]
Smith LT (2012)
[37]
Tuck E Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society (2012)
[39]
Wildcat M Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society (2014)
[40]
Wilson S (2008)
[41]
Zavala M Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society (2013)
Metrics
280
Citations
41
References
Details
Published
Sep 28, 2017
Vol/Issue
14(2)
Pages
1-24
License
View
Cite This Article
Ranjan Datta (2017). Decolonizing both researcher and research and its effectiveness in Indigenous research. Research Ethics, 14(2), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117733296