journal article Open Access Feb 03, 2022

Reporting and discoverability of “Tweets” quoted in published scholarship: current practice and ethical implications

Research Ethics Vol. 18 No. 2 pp. 93-113 · SAGE Publications
View at Publisher Save 10.1177/17470161221076948
Abstract
Twitter is an increasingly common source of rich, personalized qualitative data, as millions of people daily share their thoughts on myriad topics. However, questions remain unclear concerning if and how to quote publicly available social media data ethically. In this study, focusing on 136 education manuscripts quoting 2667 Tweets, we look to investigate the ways in which Tweets are quoted, the ethical discussions forwarded and actions taken, and the extent to which quoted Tweets are “discoverable.” A concerning result is that in almost all manuscripts, and for around half of all quoted Tweets, the original author could be identified. Drawing on our findings we share some ethical dilemmas, including those that arise from an apparent lack of understanding of the technical aspects of the platform, and offer suggestions for promoting ethically-informed practice.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
53
[1]
Ahmed W, Bath PA, Demartini G (2018) Using Twitter as a data source: An overview of ethical, legal, and methodological challenges. In: Woodfield K (ed.) The Ethics of Online Research. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited, 79–108.
[2]
Bell SS (2015) Librarian’s Guide to Online Searching: Cultivating Database Skills for Research and Instruction. Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited. 10.5040/9798216976684
[3]
Beninger K, Fry A, Jago N, et al. (2014) Research Using Social Media: Users Views. London: NatCen Social Research.
[4]
British Psychological Society (2021) Ethics Guidelines for Internet-Mediated Research. Leicester: British Psychological Society.
[10]
Corden A Sainsbury R (2006) Using verbatim quotations in reporting qualitative social research: Researchers’ views. Social Policy Research Unit. Available at: http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/spru/pubs/pdf/verbquotresearch.pdf (accessed 28 January 2022).
[18]
Froomkin AM (2019) Big data: Destroyer of informed consent. Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics 18(3): 27–54.
[25]
Information Commissioner’s Office (n.d.) Right to erasure. Available at: https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/individual-rights/right-to-erasure/ (accessed 28 January 2022).
[35]
Nesbitt Golden J (2015) What happens when a journalist uses your Tweets for a story (part one). Medium. Available at: https://medium.com/thoughts-on-media/what-happens-when-a-journalist-uses-your-tweets-for-a-story-part-one-a8f3db9340ad (accessed 28 January 2022).
[36]
Nolan H (2014) Twitter is public. Gawker. Available at: https://gawker.com/twitter-is-public-1543016594 (accessed 28 January 2022).
[38]
Perez S (2021) Twitter’s new API platform now opened to academic researchers. TechCrunch. Available at: https://techcrunch.com/2021/01/26/twitters-new-api-platform-now-opened-to-academic-researchers/ (accessed 28 January 2022).
[45]
Statista (2021) Number of monetizable daily active Twitter users (mDAU) worldwide from 1st quarter 2017 to 4th quarter 2020. Available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/970920/monetizable-daily-active-twitter-users-worldwide/ (accessed 28 January 2022).
[47]
Townsend L, Wallace C (2020) The ethics of using social media data in research: A new framework. In: Woodfield K (ed.) The Ethics of Online Research. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited, 189–207.
[49]
Twitter (2021a) Twitter terms of service. Available at: https://twitter.com/en/tos (accessed 28 January 2022).
[50]
Twitter (2021b) Verification FAQ. Available at: https://help.twitter.com/en/managing-your-account/twitter-verified-accounts (accessed 28 January 2022).

Showing 50 of 53 references

Cited By
28
Digital dating abuse: a Grounded Theory study

Tiago Rocha-Silva, Conceição Nogueira · 2026

Frontiers in Computer Science
Metrics
28
Citations
53
References
Details
Published
Feb 03, 2022
Vol/Issue
18(2)
Pages
93-113
License
View
Cite This Article
Shannon Mason, Lenandlar Singh (2022). Reporting and discoverability of “Tweets” quoted in published scholarship: current practice and ethical implications. Research Ethics, 18(2), 93-113. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161221076948