Sandstone diagenesis and reservoir quality prediction: Models, myths, and reality
Models and concepts of sandstone diagenesis developed over the past two decades are currently employed with variable success to predict reservoir quality in hydrocarbon exploration. Not all of these are equally supported by quantitative data, observations, and rigorous hypothesis testing. Simple plots of sandstone porosity versus extrinsic parameters such as current subsurface depth or temperature are commonly extrapolated but rarely yield accurate predictions for lithified sandstones. Calibrated numerical models that simulate compaction and quartz cementation, when linked to basin models, have proven successful in predicting sandstone porosity and permeability where sufficient analog information regarding sandstone texture, composition, and quartz surface area is available.
Analysis of global, regional, and local data sets indicates the following regarding contemporary diagenetic models used to predict reservoir quality. (1) The effectiveness of grain coatings on quartz grains (e.g., chlorite, microquartz) as an inhibitor of quartz cementation is supported by abundant empirical data and recent experimental results. (2) Vertical effective stress, although a fundamental factor in compaction, cannot be used alone as an accurate predictor of porosity for lithified sandstones. (3) Secondary porosity related to dissolution of framework grains and/or cements is most commonly volumetrically minor (<2%). Exceptions are rare and not easily predicted with current models. (4) The hypothesis and widely held belief that hydrocarbon pore fluids suppress porosity loss due to quartz cementation is not supported by detailed data and does not represent a viable predictive model. (5) Heat-flow perturbations associated with allochthonous salt bodies can result in suppressed thermal exposure, thereby slowing the rate of quartz cementation in some subsalt sands.
No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →
Showing 50 of 143 references
Zhida Liu, Xianqiang Song · 2025
Fanjian Jia, Zhiping Zeng · 2024
Xiuzhang Song, Zhengxiang Lv · 2023
Yingchang Cao, Guanghui Yuan · 2022
Kelai Xi, Yingchang Cao · 2019
Tobias B. Weisenberger, Peter Eichhubl · 2019
Long Luo, Xianzhi Gao · 2019
Friedemann Baur, Allegra Hosford Scheirer · 2018
Benjamin Busch, Christoph Hilgers · 2018
Feng Zhu, Wenxuan Hu · 2018
W. Meng, J. H. Zeng · 2018
Guanghui Yuan, Yingchang Cao · 2017
Paul Weimer, Renaud Bouroullec · 2017
Jin Lai, Guiwen Wang · 2017
Guanghui Yuan, Yingchang Cao · 2017
Guanghui Yuan, Yingchang Cao · 2015
Knut Bjørlykke, Jens Jahren · 2012
- Published
- Aug 01, 2010
- Vol/Issue
- 94(8)
- Pages
- 1093-1132
You May Also Like
Daniel M. Jarvie, Ronald J. Hill · 2007
2,457 citations
Robert G. Loucks, Robert M. Reed · 2012
2,051 citations
Gareth R. Chalmers, R. Marc Bustin · 2012
1,285 citations
Kitty L. Milliken, Mark Rudnicki · 2013
911 citations