journal article Feb 01, 2006

Chemical manipulation of glucose metabolism in porcine oocytes: effects on nuclear and cytoplasmic maturation in vitro

View at Publisher Save 10.1530/rep.1.00835
Abstract
Abstract
The objectives of this study were to manipulate metabolism of glucose through glycolysis and the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) in porcine oocytes during in vitro maturation, and determine the effects of this manipulation on meiotic progression, intracellular glutathione (GSX) concentrations and embryonic development. Cumulus-oocyte complexes isolated from abattoir ovaries were matured (40–44 h) in Purdue Porcine Medium for maturation alone (control) or supplemented with pyrroline-5 carboxylate (PC, 0.1 μM; PPP stimulator), diphenyleneiodonium (DPI, 0.1 μM; PPP inhibitor), dinitrophenol (DNP, 10 μM; glycolytic stimulator), hexametaphosphate (HMP, 100 μM; glycolytic inhibitor), PC + HMP or DNP + DPI. At the conclusion of in vitro maturation, cumulus cells were removed and oocytes were randomly allocated for analysis of GSX, metabolism and nuclear maturation, or in vitro fertilization and embryo culture. Both DPI and DNP + DPI decreased (P ≤ 0.05) the activity of glycolysis and the PPP, increased (P ≤ 0.05) the percentage of immature oocytes, and decreased (P ≤ 0.05) the proportion of mature oocytes compared with control oocytes and oocytes from the other treatments. Embryonic development (cleavage and blastocyst stage) and the intracellular content of GSX were also decreased (P ≤ 0.05) following exposure to DPI or DNP + DPI compared with control oocytes and oocytes from the other treatments. Oocyte metabolism, nuclear maturation, GSX content and embryonic development were unaffected (P > 0.05) following exposure to PC, DNP, HMP or PC + HMP. Our results suggest that metabolism of glucose through the PPP and/or glycolysis plays a key role in the control of nuclear and cytoplasmic maturation of porcine oocytes in vitro.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
61
[1]
Theriogenology (2000) 10.1016/s0093-691x(00)00390-3
[2]
Biology of Reproduction (1995) 10.1095/biolreprod52.6.1296
[3]
Analytical Biochemistry (1990) 10.1016/0003-2697(90)90208-q
[4]
Molecular Reproduction and Development (1995) 10.1002/mrd.1080410109
[5]
Molecular Reproduction and Development (2003) 10.1002/mrd.10254
[6]
Biology of Reproduction (2003)
[7]
Reproduction (2002) 10.1530/rep.0.1240675
[8]
Reproduction, Fertility, and Development (1998) 10.1071/r97080
[9]
Biology of Reproduction (2003) 10.1095/biolreprod.102.007872
[10]
Molecular Reproduction and Development (1995) 10.1002/mrd.1080420409
[11]
Theriogenology (2002) 10.1016/s0093-691x(02)00643-x
[12]
Molecular Reproduction and Development (1993) 10.1002/mrd.1080350114
[13]
Molecular Reproduction and Development (1997) 10.1002/(sici)1098-2795(199702)46:2<155::aid-mrd6>3.0.co;2-p
[14]
Developmental Biology (1994) 10.1006/dbio.1994.1075
[15]
Biology of Reproduction (1999) 10.1095/biolreprod60.6.1446
[16]
Molecular Reproduction and Development (1996) 10.1002/(sici)1098-2795(199605)44:1<121::aid-mrd14>3.0.co;2-7
[17]
Biology of Reproduction (1998) 10.1095/biolreprod58.4.1084
[18]
Biology of Reproduction (2001)
[19]
Theriogenology (2002)
[20]
Reproduction, Fertility, and Development (1996) 10.1071/rd9960485
[21]
Journal of Reproduction and Fertility (1992) 10.1530/jrf.0.0960681
[22]
Biology of Reproduction (1997) 10.1095/biolreprod57.1.49
[23]
Molecular Reproduction and Development (1998) 10.1002/(sici)1098-2795(199809)51:1<76::aid-mrd9>3.0.co;2-t
[25]
Reproduction (2002) 10.1530/rep.0.1230479
[26]
Animal Reproduction Science (2003) 10.1016/s0378-4320(03)00081-2
[27]
Reproduction, Fertility, and Development (2003) 10.1071/rd03001
[28]
(1994)
[29]
Reproduction, Fertility, and Development (2005)
[30]
Molecular Reproduction and Development (1999) 10.1002/(sici)1098-2795(199905)53:1<19::aid-mrd3>3.0.co;2-u
[31]
Molecular Reproduction and Development (2001) 10.1002/mrd.1083
[32]
(1996)
[33]
Theriogenology (1995) 10.1016/0093-691x(95)92436-d
[34]
Journal of Experimental Zoology (1976) 10.1002/jez.1401980205
[35]
Reproduction, Fertility, and Development (1996) 10.1071/rd9961029
[36]
Biology of Reproduction (1986) 10.1095/biolreprod34.1.58
[37]
Molecular Reproduction and Development (1994) 10.1002/mrd.1080370208
[38]
Developmental Biology (1988) 10.1016/0012-1606(88)90070-x
[39]
Journal of Animal Science (2001) 10.2527/2001.7961578x
[40]
Journal of Reproduction and Fertility (1989) 10.1530/jrf.0.0870063
[41]
Theriogenology (1985) 10.1016/0093-691x(85)90167-0
[42]
Journal of Reproduction and Fertility (1988) 10.1530/jrf.0.0830585
[43]
Journal of Reproduction and Fertility (1994) 10.1530/jrf.0.1000257
[44]
Reproduction, Fertility, and Development (2002) 10.1071/rd02038
[45]
Biology of Reproduction (2002) 10.1095/biolreprod66.1.167
[46]
Molecular Reproduction and Development (2000) 10.1002/(sici)1098-2795(200006)56:2<163::aid-mrd7>3.0.co;2-3
[47]
Molecular Reproduction and Development (1999) 10.1002/(sici)1098-2795(199909)54:1<92::aid-mrd14>3.0.co;2-a
[48]
Biology of Reproduction (2002)
[49]
(1995)
[50]
Reproduction (2003) 10.1530/rep.0.1260197

Showing 50 of 61 references

Metrics
77
Citations
61
References
Details
Published
Feb 01, 2006
Vol/Issue
131(2)
Pages
289-298
License
View
Cite This Article
Jason R Herrick, Amber M Brad, Rebecca L Krisher (2006). Chemical manipulation of glucose metabolism in porcine oocytes: effects on nuclear and cytoplasmic maturation in vitro. Reproduction, 131(2), 289-298. https://doi.org/10.1530/rep.1.00835
Related

You May Also Like