Machine Learning and Predicted Returns for Event Studies in Securities Litigation

Andrew Baker; Jonah B. Gelbach

doi:10.1561/108.00000047

journal article Sep 08, 2020

Machine Learning and Predicted Returns for Event Studies in Securities Litigation

Andrew Baker Jonah B. Gelbach

Journal of Law, Finance, and Accounting Vol. 5 No. 2 pp. 231-272 · Emerald

View at Publisher Save 10.1561/108.00000047

Abstract

We investigate the use of machine learning (ML) and other robustestimation techniques in event studies conducted on single securities for the purpose of securities litigation. Single-firm event studies are widely used in civil litigation, with billions of dollars in settlements hinging on the outcome of the exercise. We find that regularization (equivalently, penalized estimation) can yield noticeable improvements in both the variance of event-date abnormal returns and significance-test power. Thus we believe that there is a role for ML methods in event studies used in securities litigation. At the same time, we find that ML-induced performance improvements are smaller than those based on other good practices. Most important are (i) the use of a peer index based on returns for firms in similar industries (how this is computed appears to be less important than that some version be included), and (ii) for significance testing, using the SQ test proposed in Gelbach et al. (2013), because it is robust to the considerable non-normality present in abnormal returns.

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

31

[1]

Abadie "“Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: Estimating the effect of California’s Tobacco control program”." Journal of the American Statistical Association. (2010) 10.1198/jasa.2009.ap08746

[2]

Athey "“Approximate residual balancing: debiased inference of average treatment effects in high dimensions”." (2018)

[3]

Baker "“Single-firm event studies, securities fraud, and financial crisis: problems of inference”." Stanford Law Review. (2016)

[4]

Inference on Treatment Effects after Selection among High-Dimensional Controls

A. Belloni, V. Chernozhukov, C. Hansen

The Review of Economic Studies 2013 10.1093/restud/rdt044

[5]

Binder "“The Event Study Methodology Since 1969”." Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting. (1998) 10.1023/a:1008295500105

[6]

Boehmer "“Event-study methodology under conditions of event-induced variance”." Journal of Financial Economics. (1991) 10.1016/0304-405x(91)90032-f

[7]

Brav "“Event Studies in Securities Litigation: Low Power, Confounding Effects, and Bias”." Washington University Law Review. (2015)

[8]

Measuring security price performance

Stephen J. Brown, Jerold B. Warner

Journal of Financial Economics 1980 10.1016/0304-405x(80)90002-1

[9]

Brown "“Using Daily Stock Returns The Case of Event Studies”." Journal of Financial Economics. (1985) 10.1016/0304-405x(85)90042-x

[10]

On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance

Mark M. Carhart

The Journal of Finance 1997 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03808.x

[11]

Chandra "“A Reexamination of the Power of Alternative Return-Generating Models and the Effect of Accounting for Cross-Sectional Dependencies in Event Studies”." Journal of Accounting Research. (1990) 10.2307/2491157

[12]

Double/debiased machine learning for treatment and structural parameters

Victor Chernozhukov, Denis Chetverikov, Mert Demirer et al.

The Econometrics Journal 2018 10.1111/ectj.12097

[13]

Conley "“Inference with ”difference in differences” with a small number of policy changes”." Review of Economics and Statistics. (2011) 10.1162/rest_a_00049

[14]

Corrado "“A Nonparametric Test for Abnormal Security-Price Performance in Event Studies”." Journal of Financial Economics. (1989) 10.1016/0304-405x(89)90064-0

[15]

Corrado "“Event studies: A methodology review”." Accounting and Finance. (2011) 10.1111/j.1467-629x.2010.00375.x

[16]

Dove "“Bias-Corrected Estimation of Price Impact in Securities Litigation”." American Law and Economics Review. (2019)

[17]

The Adjustment of Stock Prices to New Information

Eugene F. Fama, Lawrence Fisher, Michael C. Jensen et al.

International Economic Review 1969 10.2307/2525569

[18]

Fama "“The CAPM is Wanted, Dead or Alive”." The Journal of Finance. (1996)

[19]

Fisch "“The Logic and Limits of Event Studies in Securities Fraud Litigation”." Texas Law Review. (2018)

[20]

Gelbach "“Power and Stasticial Significance in Securities Fraud Litigation”." Harvard Business Law Review. (2021)

[21]

Gelbach "“A Bayesian Approach to Event Studies for Securities Litigation”." Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics. (2020) 10.1628/jite-2020-0012

[22]

Gelbach "“Valid Inference in Single-Firm, Single-Event Studies”." Tech. rep. (2013)

[23]

Haw "“Adversarial Economics in Antitrust Litigation: Losing Academic Consensus in the Battle of the Experts”." Vanderbilt Law Review. (2012)

[24]

Hein "“ Improving Tests of Abnormal Returns by Bootstrapping the Multivariate Regression Model with Event Paraments”." Journal of Financial Econometrics. (2004) 10.1093/jjfinec/nbh018

[25]

Imbens "“Balancing, regression, difference-indifferences and synthetic control methods: A synthesis”." (2016)

[26]

Kleinberg "“Prediction Policy Problems †”." American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings. (2015) 10.1257/aer.p20151023

[27]

Kolari "“Event study testing with cross-sectional correlation of abnormal returns”." Review of Financial Studies. (2010) 10.1093/rfs/hhq072

[28]

Kothari "“ Econometrics of Event Studies”. In:" (2007) 10.1016/b978-0-444-53265-7.50015-9

[29]

Corporate Forecasts of Earnings Per Share and Stock Price Behavior: Empirical Test

James M. Patell

Journal of Accounting Research 1976 10.2307/2490543

[30]

Tibshirani "“Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso”." Source: Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological). (1996)

[31]

Wooldridge Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press. (2002)

Metrics

4

Citations

31

References

Details

Published: Sep 08, 2020
Vol/Issue: 5(2)
Pages: 231-272

Authors

A

Andrew Baker

Stanford University , , ,

J

Jonah B. Gelbach

University of California at Berkeley , , ,

Cite This Article

Andrew Baker, Jonah B. Gelbach (2020). Machine Learning and Predicted Returns for Event Studies in Securities Litigation. Journal of Law, Finance, and Accounting, 5(2), 231-272. https://doi.org/10.1561/108.00000047

Machine Learning and Predicted Returns for Event Studies in Securities Litigation

You May Also Like