journal article
Open Access
Mar 15, 2014
Taking Shorthand for Literacy: Historicizing the Literate Activity of US Women in the Early Twentieth-Century Office
Abstract
In this essay, I argue that neglect in literacy studies of the early twentieth-century office as a site of women’s literate labor has been reinforced by two commonplaces about clerical work: first, that clerical work was routinized and deskilled after the turn of the century (and, consequently, became “women’s work”), and second, that the labor of writing was split into the “head” work of male executives and the “hand” work of female clerical workers. Focusing on the figure of the early twentieth-century female stenographer, I identify some of the problems with these two commonplaces and urge literacy scholars to recover the labor of clerical workers in their histories. The essay concludes with a brief discussion of the diary of a stenographer named Irene Chapin, who lived and worked in Western Massachusetts in the late 1920s.
Topics
No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →
References
55
[1]
Augst, Thomas. The Clerk's Tale: Young Men and Moral Life in Nineteenth-Century America. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2003. Print.
10.7208/chicago/9780226795737.001.0001
[2]
Baker, Nancy. Message to the author. 7 Apr. 2012. E-mail.
[3]
Bjelopera, Jerome P. City of Clerks: Office and Sales Workers in Philadelphia, 1870-1920. Urbana: U of Illinois P, 2005. Print. The Working Class in American History.
[4]
Brandt, Deborah. Literacy in American Lives. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2001. Print.
10.1017/cbo9780511810237
[5]
---. “‘Who’s the President?’: Ghostwriting and Shifting Values in Literacy.” College English. 69.6 (2007): 549-71. Print.
10.58680/ce20075871
[6]
[7]
Chapin, Irene A. “Irene A. Chapin Diaries, 1926-1935.” Call no.: MS 585, Special Collections and University Archives, University of Massachusetts Amherst Libraries.
[8]
Cohn, Samuel. The Process of Occupational Sex-Typing: The Feminization of Clerical Labor in Great Britain, 1870-1936. Philadelphia: Temple UP, 1985. Print. Women in the Political Economy.
[9]
Connors, Robert J. Composition-Rhetoric: Backgrounds, Theory, and Pedagogy. Pittsburgh: U of Pittsburgh P, 1997. Print. Pittsburgh Ser. in Composition, Literacy, and Culture.
10.2307/j.ctt5hjt92
[10]
Cowan, Ruth Schwartz. More Work for Mother: The Ironies of Household Technology from the Open Hearth to the Microwave. New York: Basic Books, 1983. Print.
[11]
Daniell, Beth. “Narratives of Literacy: Connecting Composition to Culture.” College Composition and Communication. 50.3 (1999): 393-410. Print.
10.58680/ccc19991337
[12]
Davies, Margery W. Woman's Place Is at the Typewriter: Office Work and Office Workers, 1870-1930. Philadelphia: Temple UP, 1982. Print. Class and Culture.
[13]
---. “Woman’s Place is at the Typewriter: The Feminization of the Clerical Labor Force.” Radical America. 8.4 (1974): 1-28. Print.
[14]
Dykema, Karl W. “The Problem of Freshman English in the Liberal Arts College.” College Composition and Communication. 2.2 (1951): 3-5. Print.
10.58680/ccc195123213
[15]
Ede, Lisa S, and Andrea A. Lunsford. Singular Texts/Plural Authors: Perspectives on Collaborative Writing. 1990. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 1992. Print.
[16]
Edison Business Phonograph. Advertisement. Worcester Magazine Oct. 1911: xxix. Digital Treasures: A Central and Western Massachusetts Digital Library Project. Web. 11 March 2013. <http://dlib.cwmars.org/cdm4/images/full_size/Worcester/29.jpg >.
[17]
Enoch, Jessica. Refiguring Rhetorical Education: Women Teaching African American, Native American, and Chicano/a Students, 1865-1911. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 2008. Print.
[18]
Fine, Lisa M. The Souls of the Skyscraper: Female Clerical Workers in Chicago, 1870-1930. Philadelphia: Temple UP, 1990. Print. Women in the Political Economy.
[19]
Gardner, Edward Hall. Constructive Dictation: “Plan Your Letter.” New York: Gregg Pub. Co, 1919. Internet Archive. Web. 15 March 2013.
[20]
Gere, Anne Ruggles. Intimate Practices: Literacy and Cultural Work in US Women’s Clubs, 1880-1920. Urbana: U of Illinois P, 1997. Print.
[21]
Gitelman, Lisa. Scripts, Grooves, and Writing Machines: Representing Technology in the Edison Era. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1999. Print.
10.1515/9781503617353
[22]
Hollis, Karyn L. Liberating Voices: Writing at the Bryn Mawr Summer School for Women Workers. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 2004. Print. Studies in Rhetorics and Feminisms.
[23]
Jacob, Kathryn Allamong. “Writing in Code: A Long Life in Shorthand: Florence Julie Lillibridge.” Schlesinger Library Newsletter. Spring 2013. Web. 31 December 2013. <http://www.radcliffe.harvard.edu/news/schlesinger-newsletter/writing-in-code>.
[24]
Johnson, Nan. Gender and Rhetorical Space in American Life, 1866-1910. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 2002. Print. Studies in Rhetorics and Feminisms.
[25]
Kates, Susan. Activist Rhetorics and American Higher Education: 1885-1937. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 2001. Print.
[26]
Kittler, Friedrich A. Gramophone, Film, Typewriter. Trans. Geoffrey Winthrop-Young and Michael Wutz. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1999. Print. Writing Science.
[27]
Kwolek-Folland, Angel. Engendering Business: Men and Women in the Corporate Office, 1870-1930. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1994. Print. Gender Relations in the American Experience.
10.1080/03612759.1995.9949141
[28]
Leffingwell, William Henry, ed. The Office Appliance Manual: The Official Book of the Industry. USA: Office Equipment Catalogue, Inc., 1926. Print.
[29]
---. Scientific Office Management. Chicago: A.W. Shaw Company, 1917. Google Book Search. Web. 7 April .
[30]
Lerman, Nina E., Ruth Oldenziel, and Arwen P. Mohun, eds. Gender and Technology: A Reader. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 2003. Print.
[31]
Light, Jennifer. “Programming.” Gender and Technology: A Reader. Eds. Nina E. Lerman, Ruth Oldenziel, and Arwen P. Mohun. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 2003. 295-326. Print.
[32]
Lupton, Ellen. Mechanical Brides: Women and Machines from Home to Office. New York: Cooper-Hewitt, National Museum of Design, Smithsonian Institution, and Princeton Architectural P, 1993. Print.
[33]
Mattingly, Carol. “Telling Evidence: Rethinking What Counts in Rhetoric.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly. 32.1 (2002): 99-108. Print.
10.1080/02773940209391223
[34]
McGaw, Judith A. “Women and the History of American Technology.” Signs. 7.4 (1982): 798-828. Print.
10.1086/493922
[35]
Miller, Susan. Rescuing the Subject: A Critical Introduction to Rhetoric and the Writer. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 1989. Print.
[36]
---. “Writing Studies as a Mode of Inquiry.” Rhetoric and Composition as Intellectual Work. Ed. Gary A. Olson. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 2002. 41-54. Print.
[37]
Morton, David L, Jr. Sound Recording: The Life Story of a Technology. 2004. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 2006. Print.
10.5040/9798216016700
[38]
Nichols, Frederick G. Editor’s Introduction. English for Secretaries: The Fundamentals of Correct Writing Applied to Correspondence. By Kate M. Monro. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1944. ix-xi. Internet Archive. Web. 26 December 2013.
[39]
O’Brien, Robert Lincoln. “Machinery and English Style,” Atlantic Monthly. 94 (1904): 464-72. Google Book Search. Web. 5 January 2014.
[40]
Ohmann, Richard M. Politics of Letters. Middletown: Wesleyan UP, 1987. Print.
[41]
Paine, Charles. The Resistant Writer: Rhetoric as Immunity, 1850 to the Present. Albany: SUNY P, 1999. Print. Literacy, Culture, and Learning: Theory and Practice.
[42]
Price, Leah. “Diary: The Death of Stenography.” London Review of Books. 30.23 (2008): 43. Web. 5 January 2014.
[43]
Rice, Jenny Edbauer. “Rhetoric's Mechanics: Retooling the Equipment of Writing Production.” College Composition and Communication. 60.2 (2008): 366-387. Print.
10.58680/ccc20086870
[44]
Rohan, Liz. “Reveal Codes: A New Lens for Examining and Historicizing the Work of Secretaries.” Computers and Composition. 20.3 (2003): 237-253. Print.
10.1016/s8755-4615(03)00034-3
[45]
Rose, Mike. The Mind at Work: Valuing the Intelligence of the American Worker. New York: Penguin, 2004. Print.
[46]
Royster, Jacqueline Jones. Traces of a Stream: Literacy and Social Change Among African American Women. Pittsburgh: U of Pittsburgh P, 2000. Print. Pittsburgh Ser. in Composition, Literacy, and Culture.
10.2307/j.ctt6wrb9s
[47]
Russell, David R. Writing in the Academic Disciplines, 1870-1990: A Curricular History. 2nd ed. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 2002. Print.
[48]
Sharer, Wendy B. Vote and Voice: Women's Organizations and Political Literacy, 1915-1930. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 2004. Print. Studies in Rhetorics and Feminisms.
[49]
Srole, Carole. Transcribing Class and Gender: Masculinity and Femininity in Nineteenth-Century Courts and Offices. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 2010. Print. Class: Culture.
10.3998/mpub.232232
[50]
Stanley, Autumn. “Women Hold Up Two-Thirds of the Sky: Notes for a Revised History of Technology.” Machina Ex Dea: Feminist Perspectives on Technology. Ed. Joan Rothschild. New York: Pergamon P, 1984. 5-22. Print.
Showing 50 of 55 references
Metrics
2
Citations
55
References
Details
- Published
- Mar 15, 2014
- Vol/Issue
- 2(1)
- Pages
- 1-28
- License
- View
Authors
Cite This Article
Janine Solberg (2014). Taking Shorthand for Literacy: Historicizing the Literate Activity of US Women in the Early Twentieth-Century Office. Literacy in Composition Studies, 2(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.21623/1.2.1.2
Related
You May Also Like
Ideologies of Literacy, “Academic Literacies,” and Composition Studies
Bruce Horner · 2013
19 citations
Achieving Visibility: Midlife and Older Women’s Literate Practices on Instagram and Blogs
Laura McGrath · 2018
12 citations
Teaching While Black: Witnessing and Countering Disciplinary Whiteness, Racial Violence, and University Race-Management
Carmen Kynard · 2015
11 citations