journal article Jan 01, 2002

Generating alternatives: A key component in human reasoning?

View at Publisher Save 10.3758/bf03195272
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
29
[1]
Bucciarelli, M., &Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1999). Strategies in syllogistic reasoning.Cognitive Science,23, 247–303. 10.1207/s15516709cog2303_1
[2]
Byrne, R. M. J. (1989). Suppressing valid inferences with conditionals.Cognition,31, 61–83. 10.1016/0010-0277(89)90018-8
[3]
Cummins, D. D. (1995). Naive theories and causal deduction.Memory & Cognition,23, 646–658. 10.3758/bf03197265
[4]
Erickson, J. R. (1974). A set analysis theory of behavior in formal syllogistic reasoning tasks. In R. L. Solso (Ed.),Theories in cognitive psychology: Loyola symposium (pp. 305–330). Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.
[5]
Ericsson, K. A., &Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory.Psychological Review,102, 211–245. 10.1037/0033-295x.102.2.211
[6]
Evans, J. St. B. T., Handley, S. J., Harper, C. N. J., &Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1999). Reasoning about necessity and possibility: A test of the mental model theory of deduction.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 1495–1513. 10.1037/0278-7393.25.6.1495
[7]
Evans, J. St. B. T., Newstead, S. E., Allen, J. L., &Pollard, P. (1994). Debiasing by instruction: The case of belief bias.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,6, 263–285. 10.1080/09541449408520148
[8]
Ford, M. (1995). Two modes of mental representation and problem solution in syllogistic reasoning.Cognition,54, 1–71. 10.1016/0010-0277(94)00625-u
[9]
Handley, S. J., Dennis, I., Evans, J. St. B. T., &Capon, A. (2000). Individual differences and the search for counter-examples in syllogistic reasoning. In W. Schaeken, A. Vandierendonck, & G. de Vooght (Eds.),Deductive reasoning and strategies (pp. 241–265). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
[10]
Handley, S. J., Feeney, A., & Harper, C. (in press). Alternative antecedents, probabilities, and the suppression of inferences in Wason’s selection task.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.
[11]
Hudson, L. (1966).Contrary imaginations: A psychological study of the English schoolboy. Harmondsworth, U.K.: Penguin.
[12]
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983).Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[13]
Johnson-Laird, P. N., &Byrne, R. M. J. (1991).Deduction. Hove, U.K.: Erlbaum.
[14]
Klaczynski, P. A., Fauth, J. M., &Swanger, A. (1998). Adolescent identity: Rational vs. experiential processing, formal operations, and critical thinking beliefs.Journal of Youth & Adolescence,27, 185–207. 10.1023/a:1021663712950
[15]
Klauer, K. C., Musch, J., &Naumer, B. (2000). On belief bias in syllogistic reasoning.Psychological Review,107, 852–884. 10.1037/0033-295x.107.4.852
[16]
Markovits, H. (1984). Awareness of the “possible” as a mediator of formal thinking in conditional reasoning problems.British Journal of Psychology,75, 367–376. 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1984.tb01907.x
[17]
Newstead, S. E., Handley, S. J., &Buck, E. (1999). Falsifying mental models: Testing the predictions of theories of syllogistic reasoning.Memory & Cognition,27, 344–354. 10.3758/bf03211418
[18]
Newstead, S. E., Handley, S. J., Harley, C., Wright, H., & Farrelly, D. (2002).Individual differences in deductive reasoning. Manuscript submitted for publication.
[19]
The source of belief bias effects in syllogistic reasoning

Stephen E. Newstead, Paul Pollard, Jonathan St.B.T. Evans et al.

Cognition 1992 10.1016/0010-0277(92)90019-e
[20]
Pacini, R., &Epstein, S. (1999). The relation of rational and experiential processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,76, 972–987. 10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.972
[21]
Polk, T. A., & Newell, A. (1995). Deduction as verbal reasoning.Psychological Review,102, 533–566. 10.1037/0033-295x.102.3.533
[22]
Rips, L. J. (1994).The psychology of proof. London: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/5680.001.0001
[23]
Roberts, M. J. (2000). Strategies in relational inference.Thinking & Reasoning,6, 1–26. 10.1080/135467800393902
[24]
Roberts, M. J., Newstead, S. E., &Griggs, R. A. (2001). Quantifier interpretation and syllogistic reasoning.Thinking & Reasoning,7, 173–204. 10.1080/13546780143000008
[25]
Stanovich, K. E., &West, R. F. (1998). Individual differences in rational thought.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,127, 161–188. 10.1037/0096-3445.127.2.161
[26]
Stenning, K., &Oberlander, J. (1995). A cognitive theory of graphical and linguistic reasoning: Logic and implementation.Cognitive Science,19, 97–140. 10.1207/s15516709cog1901_3
[27]
Thompson, V. A. (1995). Conditional reasoning: The necessary and sufficient conditions.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,49, 1–58. 10.1037/1196-1961.49.1.1
[28]
Thompson, V. A. (2000). The task-specific nature of domain-general reasoning.Cognition,76, 209–268. 10.1016/s0010-0277(00)00082-2
[29]
Torrens, D., Thompson, V. A., &Cramer, K. M. (1999). Individual differences and the belief bias effect: Mental models, logical necessity, and abstract reasoning.Thinking & Reasoning,5, 1–28. 10.1080/135467899394066
Metrics
35
Citations
29
References
Details
Published
Jan 01, 2002
Vol/Issue
30(1)
Pages
129-137
License
View
Cite This Article
Stephen E. Newstead, Valerie A. Thompson, Simon J. Handley (2002). Generating alternatives: A key component in human reasoning?. Memory & Cognition, 30(1), 129-137. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03195272
Related

You May Also Like