journal article Oct 01, 2000

Variability in litter quality and its relationship to litter decay in Canadian forests

Abstract
Predicting the effects of climate change on litter decomposition requires an improved understanding of the link between organic composition and the parameters used to define litter quality. Carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy with cross-polarization and magic-angle spinning (CPMAS NMR) was used to characterize 36 foliar litters, including the species used in the Canadian Intersite Decomposition Experiment (CIDET), a Canada-wide long-term litter decomposition study. The litters showed a wide range of organic composition, qualitatively interpreted as the sum of component biopolymers (mainly carbohydrates, cutin, tannins, and lignin). Only weak correlations were found between NMR parameters and Klason lignin (KLIG); however, cluster analysis based on elemental, NMR, and proximate analysis gave good separation of botanical classes. NMR also had little predictive value for 3-year CIDET mass losses, which were negatively correlated with both KLIG and KLIG/N. Mass loss generally decreased in the following order: grass > pioneer broad-leafed deciduous > conifer (deciduous and evergreen) > American beech (a fagaceae) > wood. Predictive models for 3-year CIDET mass loss derived from linear regression with elemental, proximate, and NMR analyses were superior to those using only NMR parameters, with the best model based on KLIG, N, and Ca. Although providing no molecular-level understanding, KLIG integrates the most insoluble lignin, cutin, and tannin components. Limitations and possible improvements for NMR evaluation of litter quality are discussed.Key words: Klason lignin, 13C CPMAS NMR, proximate analysis, litter decomposition, tannin, cutin, CIDET.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
53
[1]
Aber J.D. Can. J. Bot. (1990) 10.1139/b90-287
[2]
Aerts R. Oikos (1997) 10.2307/3546886
[3]
Aerts R. J. Exp. Bot. (1999) 10.1093/jxb/50.330.29
[4]
Almendros G. Soil Biol. Biochem. (2000) 10.1016/s0038-0717(99)00202-3
[5]
Berg B. Biogeochemistry (1993) 10.1007/bf00000785
[6]
Bryant D.M. Can. J. Bot. (1998)
[7]
Cornelissen J.H.C. J. Ecol. (1996) 10.2307/2261479
[8]
Cortez J. Soil Biol. Biochem. (1998) 10.1016/s0038-0717(97)00163-6
[9]
Côté B. Ecoscience (1994) 10.1080/11956860.1994.11682258
[10]
Czochanska Z. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin (1980) 10.1039/p19800002278
[11]
de Montigny L.E. Can. J. Soil Sci. (1993) 10.4141/cjss93-002
[12]
Fidalgo M.F. J. Agric. Food Chem. (1993) 10.1021/jf00034a019
[13]
[14]
Hatcher P.G. Org. Geochem. (1987) 10.1016/0146-6380(87)90049-0
[15]
Hobbie S.H. Ecol. Monogr. (1996) 10.2307/2963492
[16]
Huang Y. Soil Biol. Biochem. (1998) 10.1016/s0038-0717(97)00234-4
[17]
Johansson M.-B. IX. Can. J. Bot. (1995) 10.1139/b95-163
[18]
Keenan R.J. Can. J. Bot. (1996) 10.1139/b96-197
[19]
Kilpeläinen I. J. Agric. Food Chem. (1994) 10.1021/jf00048a026
[20]
Kögel I. Soil Sci. (1988) 10.1097/00010694-198808000-00011
[21]
Kögel-Knabner I. Total Environ. (1992) 10.1016/0048-9697(92)90018-n
[22]
Kolodziejski W. Anal. Chem. (1982) 10.1021/ac00245a035
[23]
Kricheldorf H.R. Colloid Polym. Sci. (1984) 10.1007/bf01452215
[24]
Lorenz K. Soil Biol. Biochem. (2000) 10.1016/s0038-0717(99)00201-1
[25]
Love G.D. Phytochemistry (1998) 10.1016/s0031-9422(98)00103-4
[26]
Maciel G.E. J. Agric. Food Chem. (1985) 10.1021/jf00062a006
[27]
Manders W.F. Holzforschung (1987) 10.1515/hfsg.1987.41.1.13
[28]
Martínez A.T. Holzforschung (1991) 10.1515/hfsg.1991.45.4.279
[29]
Meentemeyer V. Ecology (1978) 10.2307/1936576
[30]
Melillo J.M. Ecology (1982) 10.2307/1936780
[31]
Melillo J.M. Plant Soil (1989) 10.1007/bf02202587
[32]
Moore T.R. Glob. Change Biol. (1999) 10.1046/j.1365-2486.1998.00224.x
[33]
Moorhead D.L. Global Biogeochem. Cycles (1999) 10.1029/1998gb900014
[34]
Newman R.H. Plant Physiol. (1996) 10.1104/pp.111.2.475
[35]
Pacchiano R.A. J. Agric. Food Chem. (1993) 10.1021/jf00025a017
[36]
Pérez-Harguindeguy N. Plant Soil (2000) 10.1023/a:1014981715532
[37]
Prescott C.E. Can. J. For. Res. (1994) 10.1139/x94-313
[38]
Preston C.M. Can. J. Spectrosc. (1986)
[39]
Preston C.M. Plant Soil (1994) 10.1007/bf00007919
[40]
Preston C.M. Can. J. Bot. (1997) 10.1139/b97-872
[41]
Preston C.M. For. Ecol. Manage. (1998) 10.1016/s0378-1127(98)00307-7
[42]
Ray A.K. Phytochemistry (1995) 10.1016/0031-9422(94)00627-6
[43]
Sanger L.J. Soil Biol. Biochem. (1998) 10.1016/s0038-0717(97)00193-4
[44]
Snow C.S.R. England. Biol. Conserv. (1997) 10.1016/s0006-3207(96)00147-4
[45]
Stump L.M. Can. J. For. Res. (1993) 10.1139/x93-067
[46]
Taylor B.R. Ecology (1989) 10.2307/1938416
[47]
Taylor B.R. Can. J. Bot. (1991) 10.1139/b91-281
[48]
Terashima N. Phytochemistry (1997) 10.1016/s0031-9422(97)00359-2
[49]
Trofymow J.A. Water Air Soil Pollut. (1995) 10.1007/bf01182835
[50]
Wilson M.A. Org. Geochem. (1988) 10.1016/0146-6380(88)90145-3

Showing 50 of 53 references

Metrics
76
Citations
53
References
Details
Published
Oct 01, 2000
Vol/Issue
78(10)
Pages
1269-1287
License
View
Cite This Article
Caroline M Preston, JA (Tony) Trofymow, the Canadian Intersite Decompositio Working Group (2000). Variability in litter quality and its relationship to litter decay in Canadian forests. Canadian Journal of Botany, 78(10), 1269-1287. https://doi.org/10.1139/b00-101
Related

You May Also Like

A method for the extraction of chlorophyll from leaf tissue without maceration

J. D. Hiscox, G. F. Israelstam · 1979

2,517 citations

Early embryogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. II. The developing embryo

S. G. Mansfield, L. G. Briarty · 1991

333 citations

Microfungal endophytes in roots

H D Addy, M M Piercey · 2005

208 citations

A checklist of the subfamily Maloideae (Rosaceae)

James B. Phipps, Kenneth R. Robertson · 1990

183 citations